Neb listed him as a Jr this year. Did he have an injury redshirt and get a COVID year?They lose Mast as well. There's quite a bit of roster work to do there.
Even if he has a year I could see him heading back to Europe.
Neb listed him as a Jr this year. Did he have an injury redshirt and get a COVID year?They lose Mast as well. There's quite a bit of roster work to do there.
They would all come here knowing they are playing 15-20 minutes a game - but they get to play for a Top 10 team and a chance to go to the Final Four. Will it work? Maybe not, but I expect they would come in with eyes wide openWhere exactly are all these minutes to come from. We already have 4 guys coming back that will command 30+ minutes. Then we add Jackson and Watson, along with 3 freshman coming in.
The 3 guys you mentioned are all playing upwards of 30-35 minutes at their old teams. They are going to come here and play what kind of minutes now?
Hadley is already playing heavy minutes at a Power 6 program and his Torvick rating is better than any of our returning guys this year. How is he going to handle the Trey King role playing 18-20 mpg?
My bad. I had him with 4 years at Bradley in my head.Mast can come back if he wants
I saw a lot of Nebraska, living in Omaha. They gave up over 80 points several times. They played a lot of teams that just couldn't score: Minnesota, Penn State, Michigan, Rutgers, Ohio State, Indiana. When you play a lot of those twice, your defensive stats look good, but have little to do with actually playing defense, IMO.not really anymore, this year Fred actually focused on D and Nebraska was top 50 in adjusted defense. That is one of the reasons they cited as becoming a tourney team, their improved focus on defense.
This is from Bossi on 247What is the scouting report on Indrusitas? We don't need a starter but it would be nice to get a couple younger guys some minutes for the following season.
Also, I hope Watson can develop some offensive game and shooting.
They have four transfers out as well, but it looks like only two (Wilcher and Rice) played, the other two didn't play a minute this year.They lose Mast as well. There's quite a bit of roster work to do there.
He was there 4 years, but '19-'20 was a medical redshirtMy bad. I had him with 4 years at Bradley in my head.
That's assuming that Nojus isn't ready to play right away. There's not really room to rotate 5 guys across those 3 spots.
But I agree with the post above that we aren't getting players looking for playing time, we're getting players looking for winning
I could definitely see that if someone like Hadley comes in to play the '3' and Milan starts at the '4' (not that those position designations matter.I'll also say, it feels like TJ and Curtis Jones maybe decided that helps the team a bunch of he continues to come off the bench. Which helps the flexibility of lineups a bunch.
I’d actually be surprised if Indrusitas doesn’t find his way into the rotation. Dude can ball.What is the scouting report on Indrusitas? We don't need a starter but it would be nice to get a couple younger guys some minutes for the following season.
Also, I hope Watson can develop some offensive game and shooting.
Given the transfers out - I don't think TJ views this next year as a "continuity" year - it seems to me that he's viewing it as a "all chips on the table" year.It's interesting, isn't it? At some point you have to make a play for some continuity pieces. We are set at the backcourt, but those guys wont be here forever. You need a Lipsey who you can count on as a solid for a multi-year period.
So do you give preference to a younger guy knowing if you don't play him he's probably gone? Or do you give that 4th guard spot to someone with more experience who may be in a position to help your team more right away.
Heise and hopefully Nojus both work out because that gives you continuity into Lipseys Sr year after Gilbert and Curtis are goneIt's interesting, isn't it? At some point you have to make a play for some continuity pieces. We are set at the backcourt, but those guys wont be here forever. You need a Lipsey who you can count on as a solid for a multi-year period.
So do you give preference to a younger guy knowing if you don't play him he's probably gone? Or do you give that 4th guard spot to someone with more experience who may be in a position to help your team more right away.
Given the transfers out - I don't think TJ views this next year as a "continuity" year - it seems to me that he's viewing it as a "all chips on the table" year.
Lol, what are you talking about. Lipsey, Milan, and Gilbert average over 30mpg the whole year and CuJo averaged almost 30 in Big 12 play. So next year our 4 best players from our Sweet 16 will get less minutes?We have some good players with elite effort, but do we really have 4 guys that command 30+ minutes?
What if the new guys are better, or at least equal? Why should returnees be locked into a certain amount of playing time?Lol, what are you talking about. Lipsey, Milan, and Gilbert average over 30mpg the whole year and CuJo averaged almost 30 in Big 12 play. So next year our 4 best players from our Sweet 16 will get less minutes?
Those 4 were absolute ballers and you want to see them less because new guys need more minutes?
Where exactly are all these minutes to come from. We already have 4 guys coming back that will command 30+ minutes. Then we add Jackson and Watson, along with 3 freshman coming in.
The 3 guys you mentioned are all playing upwards of 30-35 minutes at their old teams. They are going to come here and play what kind of minutes now?
Hadley is already playing heavy minutes at a Power 6 program and his Torvick rating is better than any of our returning guys this year. How is he going to handle the Trey King role playing 18-20 mpg?
So you think we could sign Hadley to replace his cousin?Another possibility is that the staff is being realistic that other guys might transfer, e.g. Tamin would be a shock but it's within the realm of possibility that someone throws a bag at Keshon or Curtis and they take it. Of course we all hope that doesn't happen and it's probably unlikely, but it could, and as a staff you'd likely need to consider that.
Those guys are locked in. Why do you think we were so good this year.What if the new guys are better, or at least equal? Why should returnees be locked into a certain amount of playing time?