So, we were pretty good in the second half (over 250 yards of offense, well over 100 yards rushing) largely because what did we do?
Ran outside the tackle box
Used some boot legs
And had protections to some of our stuff
First half, we tried running head first straight ahead , head down like a bull.
Didn't work.
Same players helped us score 24 points that were maligned in the first half. Same kids.
Are they the best line in the Big 12? Heck no. But you saw how a little more diverse of an approach, a toss here, a sweep there, an option here, passsing to the TE and slot receiver... opened up Cincinnati's defense. Same players. Rocco was protected better in the second half.
Why? Cause the play calling made the defense pause, rather than teeing off.
You can give me KO, Anthony Munoz, Trent Williams, Larry Allen and a sack of potatoes and if you give me 3-4 above average to good NFL quality defensive linemen and tell them " okay, boys, 80% of the time on 1st, 2nd and 3rd down this is exactly what that are doing" and those guys will struggle to block consistently.
Yes, the offensive line can be better. But I will say it till my last day, y'all have no idea how hard it is blocking people (or getting off blocks) when they know exactly what you are doing. Its already hard. But you become predictable?
Good night sweet prince its over.