So just to be clear, you think Pollard is leaving $1 million+ of revenue on the table because he just doesn’t want to do it?
He's leaving $3+ million of REVENUE on the table by not selling alcohol. We can use our peers public data to support that. The question is how much flows to ISU's bottom line. I'd argue even if its $500,000, we should do it. Fans generally want it and it can help fill a revenue gap - seems like a no-brainer.
As I mentioned, I am sure Pollard can create scenarios where ISU is not revenue positive from selling alcohol but, in my opinion, those are all not reflective of what will actually happen (i.e. they aren't going to lose $2 million of FB revenue from people leaving the SEZ).