Good post!You can work the numbers different ways, but based on last year's statement. You could cut all the men's sports that lose money and a proportionate number of women's sports/scholarships and save a little north of $10 million a year. This would prevent Title IX problems.
HOWEVER, we can not do that today because we would fall below the minimum number of sports needed to be Division 1.
So, the question for me is who comes out on top in the NCAA. Do smaller schools like ISU convince the NCAA to drop the minimum number of sports OR do the wealthy bluebloods make the NCAA hold the limit to financially break the ISUs of the world and push them to being some sort of mid-major level.
College football is going the way of the have’s and the have nots. They essentially do want to push to the side the programs that can’t keep up.
So the question becomes…. can ISU keep up? That remains to be seen obviously, but I’m not sure if there’s enough interest, or the financial means necessary to do so??