Probably a bit of "I'll believe it when I see it" with them.How is Texas Tech that low?
Same with Miami and some others. It's clear that the B12 isn't going to get the benefit of the doubt compared to the sec and big, as well as the three brands from the ACC.Why is Illinois so far ahead of us? Seems like we were very similar last year.
Tech is going to have to prove it. Purchasing a football roster isn't exactly fool proof.How is Texas Tech that low?
They were plenty salty last year.Tech is going to have to prove it. Purchasing a football roster isn't exactly fool proof.
Exhibit 1 - Texas A&MTech is going to have to prove it. Purchasing a football roster isn't exactly fool proof.
They should be interesting. They return a bunch, but so did Oklahoma State last year.Illinois? Gross.
It sucks.Glad they have ASU at #11. The rest in the 20-25 range is where I think we can expect the CFB powers to put most B12 teams in these polls. We are going to have to earn our way into the Top 20.![]()
Holy crap Illinois has a VERY favorable schedule.They should be interesting. They return a bunch, but so did Oklahoma State last year.
You can definitely see the wheels of the machine at work here, though I will say that ISU is about where I think they should be.KSU, ISU, BYU, and TT looks like, “I guess we should include some big 12 teams now that we have gotten our priority programs awarded”
I believe a lot of us feel that way, every team should have to prove it before any meaningful poll comes out.Tech is going to have to prove it. Purchasing a football roster isn't exactly fool proof.
probably more so unproven....they have the hype, but people are tired of Tech getting hype every off season and then underperforming.....now they have a lot of hype.How is Texas Tech that low?