Kickin’ It with Jerome Tang: Coaching in the Big 12, embracing college hoops, and more

DoctorZ

Active Member
Oct 28, 2021
71
180
33
67
I'd only listen to this if he admitted to being totally off-base with his accusation of there being a spy in Hilton.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: HFCS

CloneFan65

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
2,701
950
113
Phoenix, AZ
That specific subject was not broached.
I won't listen to it if he wasn't confronted about his behavior toward TJ and the program. He falsely accused the program of cheating in a most ridiculous manner, and his assistants were witnessed unfairly berating students working at the game. Unless he plans to apologize and address his behavior, I wouldn't have him as a guest on an ISU podcast.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: HFCS

cyclones500

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2010
38,803
26,810
113
Michigan
basslakebeacon.com
Regarding "Spygate," I think KIckin' It team mentioned where they decided to go and "not go," prior to the Tang segment. I'm not going to defend that decision or go out of my way to criticize it.

An unrelated question they asked, about the rebuild at Baylor after the scandal, he didn't answer directly how difficult it was. (That was the question). The answer he gave was OK, but I wanted to know how much of an uphill climb it was.
 

BWRhasnoAC

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 10, 2013
30,179
27,850
113
Dez Moy Nez
I really didn't find him that charming. It was a bunch of softball questions and he's smart enough to be a certain type of way. He showed his true colors in Hilton. TJ wouldn't give him a pass just cause he said words in the right order on any given day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NWICY

brokenloginagain

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jul 25, 2006
4,076
4,101
113
I don't like Tang.

I stomached that interview during my morning commute. It was a tough listen for sure.

Still don't like Tang. Can't believe they invited him (and he accepted).
 

Pope

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Feb 7, 2015
10,549
23,966
113
I guess I'm gonna pass on this one. How on earth do you NOT ask Tang about his spy accusations against Iowa State?? Talk about avoiding the elephant in the room.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: matt and yez

Billups06

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 18, 2006
1,519
1,609
113
It's going to take a loooooong time for me to give Tang the benefit of the doubt after his ridiculous accusations.

Same for the Kstate media. If I remember correctly, when confronted, their media personalities acted like they didn't make any 'spy' allegations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cyclonepride

cyclones500

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2010
38,803
26,810
113
Michigan
basslakebeacon.com
As I pondered a little more, even though spygate seems somewhat water-under-bridge by now, it does seem odd that you'd make effort get Tang for an interview, and not attempt to address it.

It's a "then what's the point?" type of thing. Not that it has to be the SOLE focus or topic, by any means. Could shove it toward the end of the discussion and even keep it somewhat lighthearted in your approach.

At least give him opportunity to respond. Worst that could happen is he evades it or chooses not to comment.

Now I'm trying to recall, was there some kind of informal agreement to land the interview that the topic was off-limits? Pod guys said some things the 'cast prior to the segment, now I don't remember specifics.
 

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,663
65,955
113
LA LA Land
Still a total goober, but that was a good interview.

Comes across like a lot of coaches. Seems to be a good guy off the court, but goes insane in the heat of battle.

Did Grant and Jeff ask him why he called us cheaters and racists with no proof?

If it’s hard hitting journalism like that I’m in. Otherwise skipping this one although I typically listen to it.
 

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,663
65,955
113
LA LA Land
As I pondered a little more, even though spygate seems somewhat water-under-bridge by now, it does seem odd that you'd make effort get Tang for an interview, and not attempt to address it.

It's a "then what's the point?" type of thing. Not that it has to be the SOLE focus or topic, by any means. Could shove it toward the end of the discussion and even keep it somewhat lighthearted in your approach.

At least give him opportunity to respond. Worst that could happen is he evades it or chooses not to comment.

Now I'm trying to recall, was there some kind of informal agreement to land the interview that the topic was off-limits? Pod guys said some things the 'cast prior to the segment, now I don't remember specifics.

Sounds like the ultimate win for Tang’s agent.

Hard pass on any Tang interview that doesn’t involve a deep apology.
 

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,663
65,955
113
LA LA Land
Regarding "Spygate," I think KIckin' It team mentioned where they decided to go and "not go," prior to the Tang segment. I'm not going to defend that decision or go out of my way to criticize it.

An unrelated question they asked, about the rebuild at Baylor after the scandal, he didn't answer directly how difficult it was. (That was the question). The answer he gave was OK, but I wanted to know how much of an uphill climb it was.

Yeah I’m not mad at Jeff and Grant if they decided not to talk about it.

But knowing that I skipped this when I usually listen to their podcast. Not interested in anything Tang has to say about ISU unless it starts with sincere apology.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KickinIt

Help Support Us

Become a patron