Re: Does Steele getting starting job change your prediction?
There's no logic to base it off of. Two of them have never taken a snap and Tiller has only seen limited time on the field. It was always going to be hopeful/irrational argument. Jantz is clearly the better option from an "inspiring irrational confidence in the fanbase" standpoint.
Quite possibly the least amount of logic ever used on a CF question. And that's saying a lot.
So you think Jantz takes us to 6-6. If Tiller or Barnett had won, wouldn't it mean they were BETTER and therefore our record would be equal or better?
There's no logic to base it off of. Two of them have never taken a snap and Tiller has only seen limited time on the field. It was always going to be hopeful/irrational argument. Jantz is clearly the better option from an "inspiring irrational confidence in the fanbase" standpoint.