Can't let poor folks have tax havensSounds like a bad idea. Raise the federal max for 401k and Roths instead.
Can't let poor folks have tax havensSounds like a bad idea. Raise the federal max for 401k and Roths instead.
As you probably know, CalPERS is in a bit of a shortfall financially.
They have decided to go to private equity to boost returns to save themselves --
https://www.ft.com/content/36277356-01a0-491a-a7be-6a5e742a4980
So yes, they have made the change. They are going for it.
It might save them. Or it might be opening up the seacock on an already sinking ship. Either way, the equity bros are going to be making a killing.
This is eerily similar to the Savings and loan situation back in the 80s/90s.
LiquidityI don't see more investment options as having a large downside, assuming their is transparency by the fund managers regarding the portfolio holdings.
Liquidity
Serious question, has anyone ever had a 401k where you didn't choose funds, and where those funds' holdings were clear?
Between my wife and I we've had 7 different 401k plans and that's how they all worked. As has been the case with everybody I've ever talked to about this.
Can't let poor folks have tax havens
It's not just more options. It could effect funds people are already using. Private equity is typically more volatile. Just something to keep on eye on when reviewing your funds.
I've never seen a 401k without a cheap s&p500 choice.
I get that but it's not like Vanguard will not have lower risk options available that have little if no exposure to PE.Just select those options. Problem solved.
Many plans, including the one I use, basically have like retirement goal date funds. My 401k is basically in a "retire in 2040" bucket, which starts out more aggressive and then gets more conservative as you approach that date. I have some sprinkled in other places, but if I'm totally honest I have absolutely no idea what it's invested in.
I'm surprised many plans have only the target date funds, but I use these as well in addition to some other funds in my plan. My guess is exposure to PE in target date funds will be highest in the far-out target date funds and get smaller as you get closer.
I just don't see this as some scary thing. It's one more way to diversify. I think it will take some time to get more knowledge built into the funds to effectively manage PE investments. I wonder if essentially these funds buy shares into pools of some sort to diversify within PE.
There are absolutely awful investments available to damn near every fund in every 401k out there as it is right now. Most funds could go buy some straight dogcrap muni or corporate bonds or garbage stocks right now and I don't see anybody freaking out about it. There are thousands of terrible options that fund managers can access right now.
For a vast majority of people they will have plenty of options for funds that avoid PE exposure altogether. These might take higher fees, but in the end the funds have to perform vs. their cost or they get destroyed. For the few that have such limited fund options that they can't avoid it, your funds have had access to terrible investments for years as it is.
for a married couple that is $19,500 each for 401k. Plus you can do another $6k each in an IRA. And if it works for your situation you can do $7100 in an HSA.If you are in a spot where you can defer $19,500 per year into your 401k plan, I wouldnt call you "poor folk".
There are lots of PE structures. There are PE mf's now. Most are useless and do not provide any alpha.Yeah, that will be one rough obsticle to overcome. Most mutual funds will flip their portfolios completely within a one to three year timeframe, PE would be a tough thing to get in and out of. Wonder if it would be more in the loan area?
If you are in a spot where you can defer $19,500 per year into your 401k plan, I wouldnt call you "poor folk".
True, but a lot of 401k investors aren't sophisticated enough to know what they're getting into. When I worked in the industry, we had some 401ks that offered self-directed brokerage (SDBA) through a third party. Even that was too complicated for the average 401k participant. Talked to a guy who just thought the SDBA firm was professionally managing his funds and he didn't have to choose any investments. Nope. All his money was sitting in the intermediary (sweep) account for over 20 years, earning exactly 0%.I read about this story a day or two ago, and if I understand it correctly, private equity funds could be added to the list options you choose. But the you would still have control over the funds you want to invest in, just like know. Unless I'm wrong, it's not like a third party all if a sudden has control of your 401k.
I could be wrong and if someone else has insight to this, I'd like to learn more.