Big 12 Network Announcers

AlleyAddict

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2010
2,607
129
63
Ames
Your missing the point. I really could care less about the chiefs and how he calls the chiefs games.

I'm more interested in the Cyclones

Not sensitive in the least bit. I brought up a casual point and was just discussing it, NOT being sensitive.

Couldn't disagree more. I don't care if you haven't won a game in 30 years, you call the game fair. That is their job.

Our job as FANS is to say, "we suck, we got smoked, we got handled again"

Kansas fans can say all day that they killed us, I have no problem with that. Just because because we got beat by 20 doesn't mean they needed to say some of those things. I very acceptable thing to say would be, "Kansas showed up and played a great game"."Iowa State couldn't get the ball rolling." "Iowa State racks up more injuries, gets beat by Kansas."

Remember: I'm not nit picking, I was bring up a point that I usually don't here some of those thing from most announcers. Not a big deal, just a thread.

They don't "have" to say anything along those lines. They "Have" to call the game fair.

If not, why not have every ESPN or Big 12 network announcer call their favorite teams' games, that would be awesome for both teams I bet. There wouldn't be any biased opinions or anything.

I've read and reread your posts and I honestly cannot tell what point you're trying to make. Are you trying to say that the commentators focused on the Jayhawks instead of the Cyclones? They didn't have much to talk about because ISU was getting killed and they need to fill the airtime with something. There wasn't really a game going on so they focused on the #1 team in the nation, and I'm fine with it.
 

Cy4Patriots

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2011
3,682
70
48
I've read and reread your posts and I honestly cannot tell what point you're trying to make. Are you trying to say that the commentators focused on the Jayhawks instead of the Cyclones? They didn't have much to talk about because ISU was getting killed and they need to fill the airtime with something. There wasn't really a game going on so they focused on the #1 team in the nation, and I'm fine with it.

Yea, typical.

Since again, you don't understand words.

You guys must love Kansas. You have spend more time saying the are the NUMBER 1 IN THE COUNTRY. I DON'T CARE, do you get that? I DON'T CARE. One more time, I DON'T CARE.

My point is, THEY SEEMED TO BE FAVORING KANSAS, IN MY MIND, I DON'T THINK ANY ANNOUNCERS SHOULD FAVOR ANY TEAM.

AGAIN, I DON'T CARE IF WE SUCK, AND THEY ARE THE BEST, CALL THE GAME FAIR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


DO YOU GET MY POINT?


GO CYCLONES. I SUPPORT THE CYCLONES. AND I SUPPORT FAIR GAME CALLING.
 

Cy4Patriots

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2011
3,682
70
48
I've read and reread your posts and I honestly cannot tell what point you're trying to make. Are you trying to say that the commentators focused on the Jayhawks instead of the Cyclones? They didn't have much to talk about because ISU was getting killed and they need to fill the airtime with something. There wasn't really a game going on so they focused on the #1 team in the nation, and I'm fine with it.

So, my point is that they favored Kansas, you agree? Thats how you make it sound.

Have you read any of the things people post on here? IT'S NOT EVEN RELATED TO ISU. I was just curious on what people thought. A simple, "oh it seemed like they were fair" would have been fine.

I should have just made a poll, that would say: A) Agree or B) Disagree.

That would have made things easier for everyone, as people can't understand my "point."
 

michaelrr1

Well-Known Member
Mar 30, 2006
8,212
1,884
113
WDM
Some people aren't happy unless they have something to complain about. To them, the whole world is against ISU. Not everyone is going to tell you what you want to hear.
 

Cy4Patriots

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2011
3,682
70
48
I've read and reread your posts and I honestly cannot tell what point you're trying to make. Are you trying to say that the commentators focused on the Jayhawks instead of the Cyclones? They didn't have much to talk about because ISU was getting killed and they need to fill the airtime with something. There wasn't really a game going on so they focused on the #1 team in the nation, and I'm fine with it.

You could see a Kansas player punch DG and since they were #1 that would be well deserved.

You guys have an obsession for Kansas, "their #1", "their the best", "they could have beat us with their 3rd string." So? They played a great game. Move on!
 

michaelrr1

Well-Known Member
Mar 30, 2006
8,212
1,884
113
WDM
So, my point is that they favored Kansas, you agree? Thats how you make it sound.

Have you read any of the things people post on here? IT'S NOT EVEN RELATED TO ISU. I was just curious on what people thought. A simple, "oh it seemed like they were fair" would have been fine.

I should have just made a poll, that would say: A) Agree or B) Disagree.

That would have made things easier for everyone, as people can't understand my "point."

So when most people disagree with you, why do you keep whining if you actually wanted other people's opinions? People disagree with you. Deal with it and move on.
 

Cy4Patriots

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2011
3,682
70
48
Some people aren't happy unless they have something to complain about. To them, the whole world is against ISU. Not everyone is going to tell you what you want to hear.

COMPLAIN? This is a thread were i stated MY opinion.

You think that because their #1, they can have announcers call the game unfair?

Most of the people's posts are agreeing with me that, they called it favoring Kansas. That was why I posted, but people are attacking it because, they believe that its okay to call the game unfair because it's the #1 team. Thats NOT my POINT!!!
 

Cubsfan

Member
Feb 9, 2009
346
8
18
Des Moines
I thought the play-by-play was fine. The one thing is the color guy called Ejim "Marvin E-Jim." It was at least the second time he pronounced Ejim's last name wrong. We have 7 players that play, and he acts as though he was reading the name off a cue card for the first time (maybe he was). That's a pet peeve.. I think it's a lack of professionalism and ranks right up with calling us the Iowa State Hawkeyes.
 

Cy4Patriots

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2011
3,682
70
48
^^^ This ^^^

I think they forgot that they weren't working for the KU television network. They are supposed to announce, not lead cheers.

Hmmm....


I imagine that you wouldn't have much of a problem with it if we had smoked KU and they had described our win as such.

I agree in general with you, but this is what we get for being the laughing stock of the conference. Some day it might get better. Some day.

Hmmmm.....


I'm hoping next game they can talk about twins for more than a half an hour, 25 minutes just isn't enough for me. Stock with football Mitch.

Hmmm...

The only thing that really bugged me is how much they kept talking about "brothers" and "twins".

I tell you if the one guy said "And I think there's really only one other set of twins that could possibly be in the conversation.." Just ******* tell us who you're talking about it! He honestly teased that for like 10 minutes.


Their seems to be some people that feel the same way as I do or close to it.
 

Cy4Patriots

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2011
3,682
70
48
I thought the play-by-play was fine. The one thing is the color guy called Ejim "Marvin E-Jim." It was at least the second time he pronounced Ejim's last name wrong. We have 7 players that play, and he acts as though he was reading the name off a cue card for the first time (maybe he was). That's a pet peeve.. I think it's a lack of professionalism and ranks right up with calling us the Iowa State Hawkeyes.

Couldn't agree more.
 

michaelrr1

Well-Known Member
Mar 30, 2006
8,212
1,884
113
WDM
COMPLAIN? This is a thread were i stated MY opinion.

You think that because their #1, they can have announcers call the game unfair?

Most of the people's posts are agreeing with me that, they called it favoring Kansas. That was why I posted, but people are attacking it because, they believe that its okay to call the game unfair because it's the #1 team. Thats NOT my POINT!!!

They did not call the game unfair. They told it like it was. Team X crushed Team Y, and they conveyed that as that is what happened.
 

michaelrr1

Well-Known Member
Mar 30, 2006
8,212
1,884
113
WDM
Hmmm....

Their seems to be some people that feel the same way as I do or close to it.

The first two agree with you, but the last two just didn't like the twin stories. That's hardly calling the game unfairly.

I didn't say everyone disagreed with you, just most...
 

Cy4Patriots

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2011
3,682
70
48
The first two agree with you, but the last two just didn't like the twin stories. That's hardly calling the game unfairly.

I didn't say everyone disagreed with you, just most...

Here, I'll sum it up for you.

THEY WERE BAD ANNOUNCERS!

I thought they were unfair and said somethings that don't need to be said. Period.
 

mj4cy

Asst. Regional Manager
Staff member
Mar 28, 2006
31,814
14,783
113
Iowa
Your missing the point. I really could care less about the chiefs and how he calls the chiefs games.

I'm more interested in the Cyclones


I didn't miss your point at all. I compeltely disagree. They called a good game and they called it like any person watching the game should call it. ISU got their butts kicked.
 

AlleyAddict

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2010
2,607
129
63
Ames
Yea, typical.

Since again, you don't understand words.

You guys must love Kansas. You have spend more time saying the are the NUMBER 1 IN THE COUNTRY. I DON'T CARE, do you get that? I DON'T CARE. One more time, I DON'T CARE.

My point is, THEY SEEMED TO BE FAVORING KANSAS, IN MY MIND, I DON'T THINK ANY ANNOUNCERS SHOULD FAVOR ANY TEAM.

AGAIN, I DON'T CARE IF WE SUCK, AND THEY ARE THE BEST, CALL THE GAME FAIR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


DO YOU GET MY POINT?


GO CYCLONES. I SUPPORT THE CYCLONES. AND I SUPPORT FAIR GAME CALLING.

What in the world are you talking/yelling about?

Also, just because you can't convey a competent idea, that makes me unable "to understand words"?
 

AlleyAddict

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2010
2,607
129
63
Ames
Here, I'll sum it up for you.

THEY WERE BAD ANNOUNCERS!

I thought they were unfair and said somethings that don't need to be said. Period.

Well, nobody else agrees with you, everyone else thinks they were fine. Please stop trying to shove your opinion down everyone's throats, especially when most people, if not everyone, thinks you're wrong. Just drop it.
 

abcguyks

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
2,297
421
83
Olathe
Couldn't disagree with the OP more. This isn't a league where we should be coddled. We got our butts kicked.

Mitch Holtus is the best in the business in my opinion. He's also a damn good play by play announcer for the chiefs. I'm not even a chiefs fan.

Mitch is very good at football play by play.
Basketball play by play - not so much.
 

abcguyks

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
2,297
421
83
Olathe
Well, nobody else agrees with you, everyone else thinks they were fine. Please stop trying to shove your opinion down everyone's throats, especially when most people, if not everyone, thinks you're wrong. Just drop it.

Count me in as another nobody. I agree with AlleyAddict. IMO they were KU homers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlleyAddict

Help Support Us

Become a patron