I was taught defensive driving, seems like this debate could be settled by people remembering they need to be defensive when on the roads, regardless of mode of transport.
It would help thaw motorist/bicyclist relations a ton if those riding bikes would do one thing - stop at stop signs, red lights, and when they must yield to right of way. Most do not.
It would help thaw motorist/bicyclist relations a ton if those riding bikes would do one thing - stop at stop signs, red lights, and when they must yield to right of way. Most do not.
It would help thaw motorist/bicyclist relations a ton if those riding bikes would do one thing - stop at stop signs, red lights, and when they must yield to right of way. Most do not.
Dude, it has nothing to do with right of way. It has everything to do with a 2000 LBS vehical vs 23 pounds of carbon fiber. Who dies?Number one rule of the road - pedestrians will always, and I mean always, have the right of way
Um really, maybe, just maybe this should tell you something, Like get off the freakin road."We're very frustrated. We're very frustrated because this is the third friend of mine who's been hit this year," said Ruhtenberg.
Who can change the thread title to read "Bikers on Rhoads?" Isn't that how it's spelled in Iowa?
It would also help if motor vehicles would stop at stop signs:
If you don't understand the analogy that Brianhos was making, then who is the you know what?Gosh this sounds alot like a statement a retard would make. Yep
Somebody already mentioned that bikes do the same at stop signs that cars do - slow to a speed where one can slow down in a safe distance and roll on through.
Somebody already mentioned that bikes do the same at stop signs that cars do - slow to a speed where one can slow down in a safe distance and roll on through.
Really, WOW, spare me.If you don't understand the analogy that Brianhos was making, then who is the you know what?
Really, WOW, spare me.
Im not debating rights. I'm not judging right or wrong etc. It has nothing to do with me condoning anyone (car VS bike). It has everything to do with people on bikes can continue to debate about biker rights all they want but in the end it matters little.
It's pretty simple: A 2000 lbs vehical will kill you on a 23 lbs piece of carbon fiber. Why put yourself in that situation. When your head gets squished like a mellon, does having the same"rights" matter?
i totally agree! to even this out, anytime a car buzz's a cyclist the cyclist should be able to pull out an AR and unload on the car until it is out of sight. that would make things 'fair'! i love this idea! a few dead motorists would make this thing a lot more 'fair'.Really, WOW, spare me.
Im not debating rights. I'm not judging right or wrong etc. It has nothing to do with me condoning anyone (car VS bike). It has everything to do with people on bikes can continue to debate about biker rights all they want but in the end it matters little.
It's pretty simple: A 2000 lbs vehical will kill you on a 23 lbs piece of carbon fiber. Why put yourself in that situation. When your head gets squished like a mellon, does having the same"rights" matter?
Yeah, to carry through the analogy why put yourself in the situation of driving in an auto? When a semi-tractor squishes your auto and you like a mellon, does having the same "rights" matter?Really, WOW, spare me.
Im not debating rights. I'm not judging right or wrong etc. It has nothing to do with me condoning anyone (car VS bike). It has everything to do with people on bikes can continue to debate about biker rights all they want but in the end it matters little.
It's pretty simple: A 2000 lbs vehical will kill you on a 23 lbs piece of carbon fiber. Why put yourself in that situation. When your head gets squished like a mellon, does having the same"rights" matter?