I don't see how one year makes any sense considering the fact that the lines are nowhere close to being competitive and the linebackers are at least a few years away. You keep him for several seasons or can him now IMO.
By 2012, his best season, he had only a small percentage of Chizik recruits. On top of that, it's not like Chizik's recruits were anything special compared to what we've got now.
The results beg to differ.
People pretend like Chizik had a bunch of four star recruits in here. He had roughly the same level of recruits CPR gets now. I think CPR probably has less talent on the 1st string on defense than he did in his first four seasons, but he definitely has more talent in the skill positions on offense than when he got here. Attrition and injuries have much more to do with the results than whose recruits CPR is coaching.
I enjoy reading Blum’s columns. He is perhaps my favorite CF columnist.
OK, not “perhaps.” He is. But this one? I have no idea what went wrong.
Well-written, as usual. However, major flaw, almost immediately:
"Winning five games in two years is never acceptable, but right now it is reality."
(My italics).
If it’s “never” acceptable, how can you argue that a coach deserves another season? It doesn’t help that what follows that is an extensive list of excuse-making — that's a separate topic.
A better choice of words might have helped.
"Winning five games in two years does not inspire confidence... (etc.)”
This has nothing to do with my opinion of the state of ISU football or the retention/dismissal argument for Rhoads. I’m as patient as possible with ISU football coaches — it isn’t the easiest gig in college sports — but this actually makes me less inclined to be optimistic.
That really should be out the window at this point. I can understand it in September of a new year, but not November.
Don't act like you didn't enjoy those seasons after what we had been through in the previous years.2009: 7-6
2010: 5-7
2011: 6-7
2012: 6-7
How's that a climb?
I enjoy reading Blum’s columns. He is perhaps my favorite CF columnist.
OK, not “perhaps.” He is. But this one? I have no idea what went wrong.
Well-written, as usual. However, major flaw, almost immediately:
"Winning five games in two years is never acceptable, but right now it is reality."
(My italics).
If it’s “never” acceptable, how can you argue that a coach deserves another season? It doesn’t help that what follows that is an extensive list of excuse-making — that's a separate topic.
A better choice of words might have helped.
"Winning five games in two years does not inspire confidence... (etc.)”
This has nothing to do with my opinion of the state of ISU football or the retention/dismissal argument for Rhoads. I’m as patient as possible with ISU football coaches — it isn’t the easiest gig in college sports — but this actually makes me less inclined to be optimistic.
Fair point. The idea I was trying to get across was Rhoads can't change the fact that he has won 5 games in two years. I tried to explain the reason why that happened. And then make the point that within the cycle of peaks and valleys, Iowa State is due to trend up again. Blowing up the operation now would prevent that immediate climb.
Appreciate you reading and the discussion.
It is ok to be wrong Blum. We don't hate you for it. :biggrin:
Fair point. The idea I was trying to get across was Rhoads can't change the fact that he has won 5 games in two years. I tried to explain the reason why that happened. And then make the point that within the cycle of peaks and valleys, Iowa State is due to trend up again. Blowing up the operation now would prevent that immediate climb.
Appreciate you reading and the discussion.
No disrespect to you, but I can't imagine this is true. There is no way that much money could just "hide" in a sofa.
So basically your main argument for keeping Rhoads another year is simply because you think the team is due to trend up again!? Sorry, but if that's all you got then he should be gone. If you were in Vegas betting money that you shouldn't be betting and you're losing your *** do you keep betting your life savings simply because you are due to win for once?
There is more to it than that. I wish I could explain all the reasons (returning experience, schedule setup), but bottom line, yes I do think Iowa State will win several more games next year.
I don't disagree with this (I think they could win 2-3 more next year), but how many more games is "several" in your opinion? 3? Let's say they do win 5 games next year... is that enough? I mean 5 games is still under .500. That's the real question here. That would mean Rhoads had a 3, 2, and 5 win season consecutively. I fully understand the history of Iowa State football isn't good, but you are basically saying Rhoads should stick around another year because you think the team is capable of reaching 5 wins in 2015. If that is the standard then I understand, but I don't think that should be the standard.
To me, if I were an ISU fan, I would be satisfied with seasons that result in 6 or more wins. That's .500. Anything below that should be embarrassing to accept as a fan base.