BLUM: Paul Rhoads deserves another climb

BryceC

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 23, 2006
26,477
19,663
113
I don't see how one year makes any sense considering the fact that the lines are nowhere close to being competitive and the linebackers are at least a few years away. You keep him for several seasons or can him now IMO.
 

BryceC

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 23, 2006
26,477
19,663
113
By 2012, his best season, he had only a small percentage of Chizik recruits. On top of that, it's not like Chizik's recruits were anything special compared to what we've got now.

The results beg to differ.
 

vortex

Active Member
Jan 30, 2010
776
53
28
Just keep hoping, that's about all you can do these days. If you really look closely at The Rhoads years it's pretty bleak. I hate to say it but I don't see a big climb on the way all of a sudden. Keep hoping.
 

Luth4Cy

Well-Known Member
Sep 19, 2012
5,520
134
63
Ames, IA
The results beg to differ.

People pretend like Chizik had a bunch of four star recruits in here. He had roughly the same level of recruits CPR gets now. I think CPR probably has less talent on the 1st string on defense than he did in his first four seasons, but he definitely has more talent in the skill positions on offense than when he got here. Attrition and injuries have much more to do with the results than whose recruits CPR is coaching.
 

BryceC

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 23, 2006
26,477
19,663
113
People pretend like Chizik had a bunch of four star recruits in here. He had roughly the same level of recruits CPR gets now. I think CPR probably has less talent on the 1st string on defense than he did in his first four seasons, but he definitely has more talent in the skill positions on offense than when he got here. Attrition and injuries have much more to do with the results than whose recruits CPR is coaching.

He's got more talent on the outside, sure. I don't think anybody would attempt to debate that. The talent on the inside is as bad as I've seen it for 2 years running and we're hoping to scrape a ton of JUCO's together to even give ourselves a shot there.
 

Spam

Well-Known Member
May 21, 2008
7,996
2,666
113
If JP had announced announced that PR would be fired, I bet this article would have been about how it's the right decision.
 

cyclones500

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2010
38,880
26,925
113
Michigan
basslakebeacon.com
I enjoy reading Blum’s columns. He is perhaps my favorite CF columnist.

OK, not “perhaps.â€ He is. But this one? I have no idea what went wrong.

Well-written, as usual. However, major flaw, almost immediately:

"Winning five games in two years is never acceptable, but right now it is reality."

(My italics).

If it’s “never†acceptable, how can you argue that a coach deserves another season? It doesn’t help that what follows that is an extensive list of excuse-making — that's a separate topic.

A better choice of words might have helped.

"Winning five games in two years does not inspire confidence... (etc.)â€

This has nothing to do with my opinion of the state of ISU football or the retention/dismissal argument for Rhoads. I’m as patient as possible with ISU football coaches — it isn’t the easiest gig in college sports — but this actually makes me less inclined to be optimistic.
 

Spam

Well-Known Member
May 21, 2008
7,996
2,666
113
I enjoy reading Blum’s columns. He is perhaps my favorite CF columnist.

OK, not “perhaps.” He is. But this one? I have no idea what went wrong.

Well-written, as usual. However, major flaw, almost immediately:

"Winning five games in two years is never acceptable, but right now it is reality."

(My italics).

If it’s “never” acceptable, how can you argue that a coach deserves another season? It doesn’t help that what follows that is an extensive list of excuse-making — that's a separate topic.

A better choice of words might have helped.

"Winning five games in two years does not inspire confidence... (etc.)”

This has nothing to do with my opinion of the state of ISU football or the retention/dismissal argument for Rhoads. I’m as patient as possible with ISU football coaches — it isn’t the easiest gig in college sports — but this actually makes me less inclined to be optimistic.


Yes exactly. Blum makes a bunch of points about how Rhoads f'd up. And then bizarrely concludes that keeping Rhoads is the right decision.
 

Spam

Well-Known Member
May 21, 2008
7,996
2,666
113
Honey, I know I beat you, cheat on you, abuse you, scream at you, ridicule you and belittle you.

But I love you. And you're not going to find anyone else.

So you're going to stick it out with me.
 

Incyte

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2007
4,956
931
83
That really should be out the window at this point. I can understand it in September of a new year, but not November.

22 ppg first 5 games
27.5 ppg last 6

Not good but at least it's trending upward.
 

brentblum

Administrator
Staff member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jul 26, 2007
3,020
14,119
113
I enjoy reading Blum’s columns. He is perhaps my favorite CF columnist.

OK, not “perhaps.” He is. But this one? I have no idea what went wrong.

Well-written, as usual. However, major flaw, almost immediately:

"Winning five games in two years is never acceptable, but right now it is reality."

(My italics).

If it’s “never” acceptable, how can you argue that a coach deserves another season? It doesn’t help that what follows that is an extensive list of excuse-making — that's a separate topic.

A better choice of words might have helped.

"Winning five games in two years does not inspire confidence... (etc.)”

This has nothing to do with my opinion of the state of ISU football or the retention/dismissal argument for Rhoads. I’m as patient as possible with ISU football coaches — it isn’t the easiest gig in college sports — but this actually makes me less inclined to be optimistic.

Fair point. The idea I was trying to get across was Rhoads can't change the fact that he has won 5 games in two years. I tried to explain the reason why that happened. And then make the point that within the cycle of peaks and valleys, Iowa State is due to trend up again. Blowing up the operation now would prevent that immediate climb.

Appreciate you reading and the discussion.
 

Bret44

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 8, 2009
17,303
7,894
113
Cedar River Valley
Fair point. The idea I was trying to get across was Rhoads can't change the fact that he has won 5 games in two years. I tried to explain the reason why that happened. And then make the point that within the cycle of peaks and valleys, Iowa State is due to trend up again. Blowing up the operation now would prevent that immediate climb.

Appreciate you reading and the discussion.

It is ok to be wrong Blum. We don't hate you for it. :biggrin:
 

Section110

Active Member
Apr 4, 2014
1,866
11
38
Fair point. The idea I was trying to get across was Rhoads can't change the fact that he has won 5 games in two years. I tried to explain the reason why that happened. And then make the point that within the cycle of peaks and valleys, Iowa State is due to trend up again. Blowing up the operation now would prevent that immediate climb.

Appreciate you reading and the discussion.

So basically your main argument for keeping Rhoads another year is simply because you think the team is due to trend up again!? Sorry, but if that's all you got then he should be gone. If you were in Vegas betting money that you shouldn't be betting and you're losing your *** do you keep betting your life savings simply because you are due to win for once?
 

VeloClone

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2010
48,549
39,383
113
Brooklyn Park, MN
No disrespect to you, but I can't imagine this is true. There is no way that much money could just "hide" in a sofa.

55 of these could probably be hidden under the cushions:

100000-bill.jpg



I'll be back in a minute, I'm going to go check my couches...
 

brentblum

Administrator
Staff member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jul 26, 2007
3,020
14,119
113
So basically your main argument for keeping Rhoads another year is simply because you think the team is due to trend up again!? Sorry, but if that's all you got then he should be gone. If you were in Vegas betting money that you shouldn't be betting and you're losing your *** do you keep betting your life savings simply because you are due to win for once?

There is more to it than that. I wish I could explain all the reasons (returning experience, schedule setup), but bottom line, yes I do think Iowa State will win several more games next year.
 

Section110

Active Member
Apr 4, 2014
1,866
11
38
There is more to it than that. I wish I could explain all the reasons (returning experience, schedule setup), but bottom line, yes I do think Iowa State will win several more games next year.

I don't disagree with this (I think they could win 2-3 more next year), but how many more games is "several" in your opinion? 3? Let's say they do win 5 games next year... is that enough? I mean 5 games is still under .500. That's the real question here. That would mean Rhoads had a 3, 2, and 5 win season consecutively. I fully understand the history of Iowa State football isn't good, but you are basically saying Rhoads should stick around another year because you think the team is capable of reaching 5 wins in 2015. If that is the standard then I understand, but I don't think that should be the standard.

To me, if I were an ISU fan, I would be satisfied with seasons that result in 6 or more wins. That's .500. Anything below that should be embarrassing to accept as a fan base.
 

HoiBallNation

Member
Nov 12, 2014
34
3
6
Waterloo, IA
What was our record before 2009?

2005 7-5
2006 4-8
2007 3-9
2008 2-10

Then in walks CPR,

2009 7-6
2010 5-7
2011 6-7
2012 6-7
2013 3-9
2014 2/3-10/9

Also keep in mind, that prior to the conference reallignment we also played one or two more non-conference foes... easier schedule than what we face now. Adjustments take time. I get CPR has had 6 years, but he had success at the beginning, not he has had two bad seasons. When you are a first time head coach you haev to learn how to rebuild or repair a team.

Yes, I am just a upset with hwo things have turned out the last two years as any one. Any yes, it is CPR's responsibilty/fault even if some of the small things were outside of his controll, but he is where the fingers get pointed, and rightfully so.

But I do belive he has achieved more in 6 years than any other Head Coach at ISU has in their first 6 years. For this reason alone I believe he deserves a last chance. One more opportunity to right our sinking ship.
 

brentblum

Administrator
Staff member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jul 26, 2007
3,020
14,119
113
I don't disagree with this (I think they could win 2-3 more next year), but how many more games is "several" in your opinion? 3? Let's say they do win 5 games next year... is that enough? I mean 5 games is still under .500. That's the real question here. That would mean Rhoads had a 3, 2, and 5 win season consecutively. I fully understand the history of Iowa State football isn't good, but you are basically saying Rhoads should stick around another year because you think the team is capable of reaching 5 wins in 2015. If that is the standard then I understand, but I don't think that should be the standard.

To me, if I were an ISU fan, I would be satisfied with seasons that result in 6 or more wins. That's .500. Anything below that should be embarrassing to accept as a fan base.

I'm not sure 5 wins would be enough. The expectation has to be six or more IMO.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron