Greed and evil won today; and rather than stand-up and say "No" to greed and evil; Sally Mason said "Yes." "Yes. Yes. A thousand times Yes."
That's not what I meant. I meant that Nebraska is ahead of Iowa in the Big Ten. They will be a bigger deal to them.
The second one is a great point. I have no argument. A simple vote would have been a nice gesture though. The Big Ten wouldn't get rid of Iowa. That's ridiculous. There should have been no reason for them to vote yes. Whatever, it doesn't really matter. Hopefully we get to the Big East and do some damage.
Greed and evil won today; and rather than stand-up and say "No" to greed and evil; Sally Mason said "Yes." "Yes. Yes. A thousand times Yes."
Greed and evil won today; and rather than stand-up and say "No" to greed and evil; Sally Mason said "Yes." "Yes. Yes. A thousand times Yes."
And so did every other president in the Big 10. Nebraska asked to leave the Big 12. Some of you don't seem to understand that. They wanted out.
This we agree on. However, do you want someone that equally stands for greed and evil being President of your University?
When did college athletics become a philosophical and ethical debate?
When did college athletics become a philosophical and ethical debate?
That remains to be seen. They'll be treated as equals in the Big 10, not the readed stepchild from the North like they were previously.
Depending on how things get split up, their road to a championship could be much tougher than it was in the B12N.
And so did every other president in the Big 10. Nebraska asked to leave the Big 12. Some of you don't seem to understand that. They wanted out.
Yeah I'm not sure on that one either. I think this whole conference realignment business has made it clear ethics is very far down on the totem pole.
May it is time to put ETHICS back in college athlETHICS. Stand-up and join the fight.
Tornado man wrote this ^^^^
You responded thusly, inferring that if Geoffroy had to ask it would leave you speechless.
"It just was" refers to the question that was just asked, which you said would leave you speechless if it needed to be asked. I said I doubt it based on the grandstanding you've been doing over the last few days.
Now you're getting it.
Maybe not?
No, it won't be. I don't see them in PSU or OSU's division and Michigan won't be either.
THH, I really should not understand what you mean better then you. As it is, I will continue to be here to correct you.
Agree to disagree. The Big 12 North has been a pillow fight for the last 6 years.
You didn't say division. You said conference.
Well yeah. I would assume that the Big 10 is going to be split up into divisions now, and that they'll have a similar schedule rotation to what the Big 12 had.
Depending on how things shake out, their road could definitely be tougher.
But earlier you said that the BOR should be able to tell Mason how to vote. Get your story straight, old man.
What exactly did you want the BOR to do today?
Ha ha THH.
There is absolutely nothing contradictory in my posts. Recap:
Since I am of the belief it did not matter, the BoR should have told Sally to give the no vote.
I did say that if it did matter, I could see the BoR being apprehensive, as in uneasy... not as in not forcing her to do so. Can the BoR not apprehensively tell Sally to vote "no"? Perhaps to form your poor rebuttal you needed to read this as being otherwise. I understand you are grasping for anything.
Oh, and just graduating does make me feel older, I assure you I am not that old.