Chaundee Brown Final 4 List

WhoISthis

Well-Known Member
Oct 6, 2010
5,620
3,569
113
ISU was 10-13 up to the point TH was hurt, went 2-7 down the stretch. Looking at the schedule, flip the FAMU, WVU, and OSU x2 wins if TH was healthy. The rest of the games were blowouts, and those aren't being flipped with TH. So optimistically a fully healthy TH makes last years team 16-16. Maybe they don't flip one of those games and they would be 15-17.
These are 18-22 kids, I don’t even think you can say scores that look like blowouts couldn’t be flipped. Small failures can cascade and cause major disasters. Prevent the first few small failures, and no one notices a thing. That’s what happened last year without Haliburton.

We started slow, weren’t a cohesive team while trying to replace many guys. Some of the poor play games as because we had gaps in the roster (on Prohm) and we continued to have cascading failures (on Prohm), But we never got to see the group come together and have a TH playing with the group that stomped UT.

This is a buy!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Statefan10

Gunnerclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2010
75,682
80,074
113
DSM
Do you think Shayok has the legacy he has if he has this roster to play with as opposed to Wigginton, THT, Hali? NWB?

I am NOT questioning Shayoks talent/abilities, dudes a hell of a player AND deserves his NBA spot. But when you have NBA talent around you, it opens you up and allows you to have more success.

Brown does not have NBA talent around him and game planning against this team will be extremely easy UNLESS we add 2-3 Brown like players.

Shayok ran the show in KC his Sr year. Opened up a lot of eyes to his his **** making abilities. He was making everything easier for everyone else a lot of that season, not the other way around.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpokaneCY

Statefan10

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
May 20, 2019
21,198
27,221
113
My argument this whole time has been he’s good, I don’t foresee him being a program changer like some seem to be making him out to be. There’s no bar to be moved. With the current roster, I see us being a 9-12 win team and with Browns addition, becoming a 12-15 win team.

Where you and I are different

- I am not including Harris on the roster until he gets his waiver

- I am not banking on at least 2 freshmen to come in and have a huge impact as freshmen

- I am not predicting everyone on the roster has huge strides in development
, as Haliburton is probably the only player Prohms coached at Iowa State who from year 1 to year 2 became a noticeably better player.
So basically you're assuming the absolute worst. None of our guys will be eligible or we will not fill this roster with eligible talent, you don't think Blackwell and Foster will attribute much, and Jackson, Solo, Conditt and Bolton will not improve much..

Also, a problem with Prohm has been his ability to keep guys around, especially the talented ones. So in the case of Lard, Wigginton, and THT, those guys would've undoubtedly improved had they stayed on the team for more than just two seasons.
 

ISUCubswin

Well-Known Member
Mar 3, 2011
24,340
7,207
113
My Playhouse
Shayok ran the show in KC his Sr year. Opened up a lot of eyes to his his **** making abilities. He was making everything easier for everyone else a lot of that season, not the other way around.

This is correct. I am not disputing this.

If Iowa State didn't have real threats on the court in Wigginton, THT, NWB, Haliburton, Shayok probably becomes easier to stop.
 

ISUCubswin

Well-Known Member
Mar 3, 2011
24,340
7,207
113
My Playhouse
So basically you're assuming the absolute worst. None of our guys will be eligible or we will not fill this roster with eligible talent, you don't think Blackwell and Foster will attribute much, and Jackson, Solo, Conditt and Bolton will not improve much..

Also, a problem with Prohm has been his ability to keep guys around, especially the talented ones. So in the case of Lard, Wigginton, and THT, those guys would've undoubtedly improved had they stayed on the team for more than just two seasons.

None of our guys will be eligible? The only guy who I said I'm not assuming he will be eligible is Harris, because...wait for it...he hasn't received a waiver and is not eligible.

I HOPE he becomes eligible. But he currently is not eligible.
 

Statefan10

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
May 20, 2019
21,198
27,221
113
None of our guys will be eligible? The only guy who I said I'm not assuming he will be eligible is Harris, because...wait for it...he hasn't received a waiver and is not eligible.

I HOPE he becomes eligible. But he currently is not eligible.
Right right, I was saying in general. We are going to get a guy or two that will be eligible for next year. We're not going to roll with what we have currently and hope for the best. If all of those things you said happen then sure, I could see us being terrible. But it's still worse case scenario.
 

ISUCubswin

Well-Known Member
Mar 3, 2011
24,340
7,207
113
My Playhouse
Right right, I was saying in general. We are going to get a guy or two that will be eligible for next year. We're not going to roll with what we have currently and hope for the best. If all of those things you said happen then sure, I could see us being terrible. But it's still worse case scenario.

Yes, I'm planning for the season to go as this roster is currently made up. When players are added to the roster, my expectations change. As I said, 9-12 win team without Brown, 12-15 win team with Brown. Harris is eligible, expectations raise. Prohm adds guys who will be able to contribute, expectations raise.
 

WhoISthis

Well-Known Member
Oct 6, 2010
5,620
3,569
113
My argument this whole time has been he’s good, I don’t foresee him being a program changer like some seem to be making him out to be. There’s no bar to be moved. With the current roster, I see us being a 9-12 win team and with Browns addition, becoming a 12-15 win team.

Where you and I are different

- I am not including Harris on the roster until he gets his waiver

- I am not banking on at least 2 freshmen to come in and have a huge impact as freshmen

- I am not predicting everyone on the roster has huge strides in development, as Haliburton is probably the only player Prohms coached at Iowa State who from year 1 to year 2 became a noticeably better player.
If Brown can get help push us into the tournament, he is a program changer. Look at the 2021-22 roster. If we make it next year, the program pivots!

You’ve moved the bar several times. First it’s he cannot make us NCAA bubble (otherwise nit bubble), then it’s top half of Big 12, then equal to Shayok’s legacy. You seem to not say what you mean?

We differ in nearly every regard:
-the quality needed to make the tournament, let alone bubble
-what constitutes huge freshman impact
-what constitutes a program changer
-what is needed to change the program
-and most importantly, what we’d be without a player like Brown

There’s a much better chance next year without brown is .500 than 9 wins. And one player of Brown’s quality can easily be worth many wins. Just as adding a good P5 wing/small 4 would have greatly helped last year.

I’m not predicting every player to improve, that’s not needed. I am suggesting most of them will play better. Are you familiar with cascading failures? We had that. Several will improve. Most players that play for Prohm improve, it’s the ones that don’t that stagnate. Freshman like Tre improve. If Bolton improves even slightly he’s a foundation guy. Young was improving last year, I doubt that stops. Conditt, well, that’s unclear, but he has a high ceiling.

Huge freshmen impact? We most certainly can have a couple freshman make similar impact, but with Johnson and other transfers, we don’t need to. THT’s wasn’t very good offensively as a freshman, and Haliburton was good because he avoided mistakes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpokaneCY

SpokaneCY

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
13,294
8,489
113
Spokane, WA
That lottery pick also was hurt for 1/3 of the season and due to missing on Zion and Terrence who transferred force to rely on two raw freshman.
Next years team is going to be starting 3 new players and changing 6 (imo improved) in the rotation from last year. It just isn't downgrading from Hali play the first 20 games it is also improving from Nixon and Jacobson play for all 33 games. It won't be close to the same team, and I expect Tre and Rasir to improve from last year too.

Assuming you add Brown or one more high level transfer to mitigate TH's loss and incoming freshman class ISU contribute will be better than 12 wins. NIT or bubble is more likely than less than 10 wins.
(And there would be 2 more schollys available to improve.)

It's just easier to agree that the end is not near, it has passed and only a few posters are smart enough to know it's already over and they want to continually remind us that they are right but it will take years and many course corrections for them to "make their case".
 

ISUCubswin

Well-Known Member
Mar 3, 2011
24,340
7,207
113
My Playhouse
If Brown can get help push us into the tournament, he is a program changer. Look at the 2021-22 roster. If we make it next year, the program pivots!

You’ve moved the bar several times.

First it’s he cannot make us NCAA bubble (otherwise nit bubble) I said I don't think he could take us from an NIT bubble team to an NCAA bubble team, then it’s top half of Big 12 I said I don't believe he takes us from a 8/9 seed to a top half of the Big 12 team then equal to Shayok’s legacy you compared him to Shayok's legacy, I was saying I completely disagree, you must have completely misunderstood. You seem to not say what you mean?

I think reading comprehension may be an issue - please review bolded parts in your above quote that I responded to.

Then proceed to the quotes below for evidence. Read carefully.

He's good and I'd take him.

But based on stats and what I see from his tapes, I don't think he takes us from a team on the bubble of the NIT to on the bubble of the NCAA tournament.

Hope I'm wrong.

I guess what I’m saying is he’s good, but I’m not going to be drinking the kool aid. I don’t see this guy being a Deandre Kane (Deandre Kane was a boss AND had NBA talent playing with him) or being the program changer some are making him out to be. This roster, as is, is an 8/9 finish in the Big 12 (unless you believe these freshman will light the world on fire) and I don’t think this guy, single handedly, puts us in the top half of the Big 12, like some seem to be making it out to be.

Imo that team still was one of the best in ISU history!!

Guys, we’re greatly overestimating what’s needed to make the Tournament, let alone the bubble. It doesn’t take a roster without flaws or even terribly good coaching. And it certainly doesn’t take a lottery pick. Having a sound team goes a lot further than having a lottery pick.

Prohm has flaws, but come on! He’s previously accomplished this task of improving a lot after losing a lot, just two seasons ago. If we find someone to be that Shayok talent and leadership role, we’ll be AT LEAST a ******* bubble team.

Do you think Shayok has the legacy he has if he has this roster to play with as opposed to Wigginton, THT, Hali? NWB?

I am NOT questioning Shayoks talent/abilities, dudes a hell of a player AND deserves his NBA spot. But when you have NBA talent around you, it opens you up and allows you to have more success.

Brown does not have NBA talent around him and game planning against this team will be extremely easy UNLESS we add 2-3 Brown like players.
 
Last edited:

WhoISthis

Well-Known Member
Oct 6, 2010
5,620
3,569
113
I think reading comprehension may be an issue - please review bolded parts in your above quote that I responded to.

Then proceed to the quotes below for evidence. Read carefully.
Yes, I see you moving the bar. How are you not?

Let me remind you of your first point:
”I don't think he takes us from a team on the bubble of the NIT to on the bubble of the NCAA tournament”

You then MOVED the requirement taking an 8/9 team to top-half.

Then you eventually moved to saying Brown can’t take a 9-12 win team to such bubble.

Along the way, you took the analogy I provided with Shayok and moved it to Shayok’s legacy.
 
Last edited:

SpokaneCY

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
13,294
8,489
113
Spokane, WA
Yes, I'm planning for the season to go as this roster is currently made up. When players are added to the roster, my expectations change. As I said, 9-12 win team without Brown, 12-15 win team with Brown. Harris is eligible, expectations raise. Prohm adds guys who will be able to contribute, expectations raise.

So we're NOT just a single digit win team next year now? Or we ARE s single digit win team if nothing else happens? You've made some really strong statements in this thread that are really testing the boundaries of both sides of the spectrum but I'm guessing the only thing that hasn't changed is you think CSP always has and always will suck?

What is your definition of a program changer?
 

SpokaneCY

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
13,294
8,489
113
Spokane, WA
I just know exactly what happened and who the players were with this one. I don't expect others to know. Everyone can disagree with me if they want. That's fine but I know what really happened.

Not calling you out... Many think they know these stories but there are very few who KNOW/LIVED these stories. I'm none of the above - I just love a good story.
 

ISUCubswin

Well-Known Member
Mar 3, 2011
24,340
7,207
113
My Playhouse
So we're NOT just a single digit win team next year now? Or we ARE s single digit win team if nothing else happens? You've made some really strong statements in this thread that are really testing the boundaries of both sides of the spectrum but I'm guessing the only thing that hasn't changed is you think CSP always has and always will suck?

What is your definition of a program changer?

A 9-12 win team if this team, as is, takes the court next year. 9 is a single digit. That's no Harris. No Brown. You're playing 1 proven guard in the Big 12.

I don't think CSP always has and always will suck (that's a whole completely different topic) but I do think this roster, without Brown, without Harris, is not going to go out and win many games, no.

Harris becomes eligible, we get Brown, AND another impact player, we'll obviously be much better off.

But so far, we are 0/3 on that front. I hope we go 3/3 for next year, then we're talking a tournament team. But again, as of right now, Harris is not eligible, Brown is not playing for us, and we don't have another impact guy coming in. In my mind, no, we aren't more than a 9-12 win team.