Gabe Burkle, Iowa State Cyclones, Tight End
Gabe Burkle is a 6-7, 230-pound Tight End from Cedar Rapids, IA.
247sports.com
Visiting June 11th...
Listen to my podcast.
Gabe Burkle, Iowa State Cyclones, Tight End
Gabe Burkle is a 6-7, 230-pound Tight End from Cedar Rapids, IA.247sports.com
Visiting June 11th...
Listen to my podcast.
I'm sorry if this is a stupid question but where is your podcast? ThanksGabe Burkle, Iowa State Cyclones, Tight End
Gabe Burkle is a 6-7, 230-pound Tight End from Cedar Rapids, IA.247sports.com
Visiting June 11th...
Listen to my podcast.
They don't appear to be really showing any interest in him. They have had TE offers commit elsewhere and have offered new TEs but not Burkle. They are going after Riley-Ducker who I saw is recently listed as an Iowa lean and Keller and McCintosh.Wonder why the haks haven't offered. Or does Gabe have no interest in them? Fine by me, but just find it weird that THE GREATEST TIGHT END FACTORY IN THE UNIVERSE doesn't have fifty crystal balls for a dude in their back yard.
Search “Cylights” on any major podcast platform and it shows up. I listen using Pocketcasts and Google.I'm sorry if this is a stupid question but where is your podcast? Thanks
I have to believe this was a major reason we landed Soehner. The dudes build and athleticism screamed " turn me into a LT". But CMC used him in his desired position and I hope it pays off in future recruiting.I think some see Burkle as a possibility to bulk up further and move to the to the OL instead of TE. If that is how you view him, then it depends on your OL situation. Iowa added several O-linemen in the past two classes. I am impressed how Campbell and staff was able to adapt the offensive game plan to feature 2 & 3 TE sets last year. How would you like to be a defensive back trying to tackle Soehner with a head of steam? Ouch!
It is why he seemed to be constantly playing through leg injuries. Everyone went for his legs because they didn't want to die.I think some see Burkle as a possibility to bulk up further and move to the to the OL instead of TE. If that is how you view him, then it depends on your OL situation. Iowa added several O-linemen in the past two classes. I am impressed how Campbell and staff was able to adapt the offensive game plan to feature 2 & 3 TE sets last year. How would you like to be a defensive back trying to tackle Soehner with a head of steam? Ouch!
I see others have asked, but here:I'm sorry if this is a stupid question but where is your podcast? Thanks
True, but it can hurt wr recruitingNot too many coaches can say they play a lot of 3 TE sets. That's got to be a big plus when recruiting that role.
Actually it also could help, we run multi sets. Multiple TEs draw safeties up making over the top opportunities available.True, but it can hurt wr recruiting
But there are fewer WRs that are on the field at a time. If we have a 3 TE set and you're the second string WR, you aren't on the field.Actually it also could help, we run multi sets. Multiple TEs draw safeties up making over the top opportunities available.
But there are fewer WRs that are on the field at a time. If we have a 3 TE set and you're the second string WR, you aren't on the field.
But there are fewer WRs that are on the field at a time. If we have a 3 TE set and you're the second string WR, you aren't on the field.
Like I said they run multiple sets. In other words we play a lot of guys.