Having a discussion with a couple buddies and seeing if we can get some perspective from some that may be more familiar with the continuation rule. Last week Jarvis West had that play where the knee was down but the continuation rule helped the KState defender take possession and resulted in a turn over.
In the second half of the Iowa game the ISU defender came away with the ball on the way to the ground with the Iowa receiver showing possession and a knee down but ended up losing it on the way down but the Iowa offense retained possession with the officials stating the player was down. Again I'm not sure what the difference between the two were and how the play in the Iowa game was different from the play in the ISU/KSU game.
In the second half of the Iowa game the ISU defender came away with the ball on the way to the ground with the Iowa receiver showing possession and a knee down but ended up losing it on the way down but the Iowa offense retained possession with the officials stating the player was down. Again I'm not sure what the difference between the two were and how the play in the Iowa game was different from the play in the ISU/KSU game.