Dendy "suspended"

I definitely understand your point and I am on a different side than I was with the Colvin deal. It seems hypocritical I know. What I would say is there is more going on here. There is no question fo that in my mind. Do you remember when Dendy left for family reasons earlier in the year? Isn't that a little suspicious now. I don't know what happened at that time at all, however it seems odd to me. Also, his attitude when he was being coached has been bad from what I have seen. Mac said numerous times about Colvin that his behavior far exceeded what he expected and even exceeded what was needed before he even reinstated him. If Dendy does that he will be reinstated. Who knows, maybe he won't even miss a game? The fact is this is hard to compare as we do not know how long he will be suspended.

That may all be true and a lot of people on here are just speculating about things because we really don't know the whole story since no one is telling it.

The point is, no matter what the different circumstances of the 2 cases might be, the original reason for bringing Colvin back (that the team was short and GMac felt the obligation, blah, blah, blah) was pure bs. If it was not, then Dendy should be playing now. GMac would have been better off in the long run, IMO, to have left Colvin suspended. Who knows......if Colvin had been left suspended, the situation with Dendy may not have played out as it did. I doubt that would have been the effect, but you never know.
 
That may all be true and a lot of people on here are just speculating about things because we really don't know the whole story since no one is telling it.

The point is, no matter what the different circumstances of the 2 cases might be, the original reason for bringing Colvin back (that the team was short and GMac felt the obligation, blah, blah, blah) was pure bs. If it was not, then Dendy should be playing now. GMac would have been better off in the long run, IMO, to have left Colvin suspended. Who knows......if Colvin had been left suspended, the situation with Dendy may not have played out as it did. I doubt that would have been the effect, but you never know.

so your position is that because Colvin's suspension was cut short, McDermott can never suspend anyone ever again, regardless of what they do or the situation?
 
so your position is that because Colvin's suspension was cut short, McDermott can never suspend anyone ever again, regardless of what they do or the situation?


See Im not hung up on the deal. Colvin has apparently learned a lesson even though the suspension was short. Maybe Dendy doesnt learn lessons. Im pretty sure if Colvin pulls crap again, hes done, but I dont think he will.
 
so your position is that because Colvin's suspension was cut short, McDermott can never suspend anyone ever again, regardless of what they do or the situation?

Where the hell did I say that? I'm just calling bs on GMac's reason for bringing Colvin back early. At the time, some on here questioned what he would do if someone else got into trouble.....if he needed Colvin so bad that he had to bring him back early, what was going to happen the next time? Now we know.......so the stated reason for bringing Colvin back was bs. He should have just stuck with the suspension on Colvin, which even he said was within his principles. Now, having to suspend Dendy just brings into question what he did with Colvin.

And Bawbie, please stop trying to put words in my mouth. It just makes you look silly.
 
Many are still missing the point on this. Colvin was brought back early because the team had lost Boozer and Lucca, and GMac indicated he felt an obligation to the players not to leave them short-handed. Remember CB supposedly telling GMac that he had no choice? Colvin was not brought back because of his good behavior. If you believe that then you have to say that if Boozer and Lucca had continued to play, then Colvin would still have been brought back early, and I don't think anyone really believes that and there certainly was no indication of that at the time.

Colvin was brought back because GMac apparently felt he needed him to field a complete team. Well, what has changed? Did we pick up another player somewhere that no one knows about? If you so desperately needed one player back then, and it was so important that you even went against your principles supposedly to bring him back early, then how can it be okay to be short one player now?

Something doesn't add up, sorry. If the statement about need was true when you brought Colvin back, then it is true now. If not, why not? Seems more likely that what was said about needing Colvin then was just bs.
With Dendy it is about trust, he must have been deceptive or irresponcible in his actions. With Colvin Mac said he didn't think Colvin understood what it meant to wear the uniform. He brought Colvin back early for the teams benifit at the risk of Colvin still not getting it. I never heard him say that trust was an issue with Colvin. The early signs say that he made the right decision with Colvin. I trust he will make the right decision with Dendy as well.
 
:dull:
It also is really, really hard to take someone seriously when they call the German national team professional! :biglaugh:

It's really hard to take someone seriously who doesn't even know that Lucca left to play on a pro team in Berlin........:biglaugh:
 
I wonder this too. If GMac HAD to re-instate Colvin, then how can he possibly afford to suspend Dendy now? Remember all the talk about having enough bodies on the bench? Guess that was just all bs then huh? Where is the fairness here? Colvin walked out on his team and coach. Dendy went home to a family funeral. Granted, he probably should have been back sooner, but does no one else have a problem with how this is being handled? Doesn't this give the appearance of different rules for different players?

Colvin was still suspended, though. It's not like he served absolutely no suspension, it just turned out to be "shortened" for the sole reason that GMac gave a timeline. I understand what you're saying, but at least Colvin served some sort of suspension first before being allowed back on the team.
 
Well Dendy must have gained coach's trust back in a matter of days.

Or the fact that Hamilton had 2 fouls. But Mac would never go back on his word when we are thin so that can't be it.
 
Well Dendy must have gained coach's trust back in a matter of days.

Or the fact that Hamilton had 2 fouls. But Mac would never go back on his word when we are thin so that can't be it.

It's sickening to see Mac go back on his alleged principles the way he has over the last month. I'm finding it harder and harder to care about him with his changing convictions. He seemed to present himself as a no nonsense, stand up guy, but when the going gets rough, well I guess winning is more important than his character. Except he's sacrificing his image and still isn't winning. Time for a change.
 
It's sickening to see Mac go back on his alleged principles the way he has over the last month. I'm finding it harder and harder to care about him with his changing convictions. He seemed to present himself as a no nonsense, stand up guy, but when the going gets rough, well I guess winning is more important than his character. Except he's sacrificing his image and still isn't winning. Time for a change.


He may be feeling the pressure. His million dollar job is predicated upon winning.
 
:dull:

It's really hard to take someone seriously who doesn't even know that Lucca left to play on a pro team in Berlin........:biglaugh:

It's really hard to take someone seriously who compared Stephen Curry to Wes Eikmeier, in any way. :biglaugh:
 
Lucca could have waited one month. He just sneaked out of town. Plus he probably screwed our academics again.
 
He may be feeling the pressure. His million dollar job is predicated upon winning.


We're going to lose, regardless.

I don't think it's too much to ask to have a coach with a shred of moral fiber.

If you're going to lose, do it with dignity.

This season is in the crapper. What better time to actually stick to your guns because you can't lose more than you already are.
 
We're going to lose, regardless.

I don't think it's too much to ask to have a coach with a shred of moral fiber.

If you're going to lose, do it with dignity.

This season is in the crapper. What better time to actually stick to your guns because you can't lose more than you already are.

You can get the same ethical coach from a small college for $250k a year.