Does Steve Prohm have a new unofficial standard?

Cydwinder

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jun 9, 2010
1,379
700
113
London, UK
OP must be drunk or high
DBcUtoo.jpg
 

Go2Guy

Well-Known Member
Mar 18, 2006
8,991
967
113
Houston, TX
Compare ISU to Purdue, they have a little better history than ISU, have had a good run the last 15 years, have a good program, yet Matt Painter has been the Elite 8 once and the Sweet 16, 5 times. Sometimes you have to be happy and enjoy what you have.

Let's go off track and discuss Painter's success.
I'm not aware of him every coming up for mention on other openings - has the media thrown out his name, or has he ever interviewed ?Heck of a coach and impressive record and runs a clean program (relative).
As a thought, after McD left for Creighton, I wondered if we could have had a legit chance?
 

Leidang

Active Member
Apr 27, 2006
522
200
43
Let's say, for the sake of argument, that in 4 years or so Fred Hoiberg is regularly getting beyond the first round in the NCAA tournament and Steve Prohm is not. Should Hoiberg's success at Nebraska be used as a standard for what we should expect from Steve Prohm here? Would it be reasonable to expect Prohm to do at least as well here as Hoiberg does at Nebraska?

If it goes the other way can we never hear about Mr. Hoiberg again? Please?
 

bosco

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2008
9,843
7,730
113
Des Moines
Hoiberg brought ISU basketball back from the dead. And I'll be forever grateful for that because the McDermott years SUCKED.

But let's not pretend Fred Hoiberg was some amazing success here that we haven't seen before. He went had ONE Sweet 16 and 2 conference tournament titles with probably the most cumulative talent we've had at Iowa State (Nader, Burton, Niang, Naz, Monte NBA guys, Matt Thomas who is killing it in Europe and several other professional players).

Prohm has matched that success and had to fill the massive recruiting hold Fred left us in.

Outside of his player status, I have no clue why so many people are clamoring for him back...
This pretty much sums it up.
 

heitclone

Well-Known Member
Jun 21, 2009
16,628
14,429
113
45
Way up there
Let's go off track and discuss Painter's success.
I'm not aware of him every coming up for mention on other openings - has the media thrown out his name, or has he ever interviewed ?Heck of a coach and impressive record and runs a clean program (relative).
As a thought, after McD left for Creighton, I wondered if we could have had a legit chance?

I know this is a sore subject right now with the Hoiberg stuff but Painter played at Purdue under Gene Keady and was hired as a coach in waiting when Keady was on his way out. Purdue is/was his dream job, we never would have had a chance with him, not sure anyone would.

He's a really good example of a school sticking with a coach though, after some initial success of 6 straight tourneys, 4 first round wins and 2 Sweet 16's, he went 4 years without winning a tourney game. That "rough" stretch included missing the tourney twice (one CBI qtr final appearance) and two first round exits. In the 3 years since, he's gone to 2 Sweet 16's and will play for the Final Four tomorrow. Plenty of Purdue fans wanted him gone after the couple seasons he struggled, basically because they thought their program wasn't meeting their standards, the standards he helped set.

Prohm doesn't have quite as big a sample size but its a pretty similar situation with some fans thinking he's not getting it done unless he's always in the Sweet 16. Painter went to 2 Sweet 16's in his first 5 seasons at Purdue, it took him 6 more years to get his 3rd. Just food for thought for the people who think Prohm should be living in the Sweet 16 or beyond.
 
Last edited:

Tre4ISU

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 30, 2008
28,211
9,323
113
Estherville
Let's say, for the sake of argument, that in 4 years or so Fred Hoiberg is regularly getting beyond the first round in the NCAA tournament and Steve Prohm is not. Should Hoiberg's success at Nebraska be used as a standard for what we should expect from Steve Prohm here? Would it be reasonable to expect Prohm to do at least as well here as Hoiberg does at Nebraska?

I think so. Iowa State has a DEEP tradition and history in basketball. For all the years that we sucked in football, we regarded ISU as a "basketball school". I don't care who is coaching at Nebraska, we should be able to do as well as a school with next to no history in the sport, and which as of right now still has NO NCAA tournament wins.

I think Pollard giving Prohm a contract extension is going to haunt him.

The fans think ISU has this. In reality, it doesn't. It just seems this way because the football program has been so miserable.
 

Tre4ISU

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 30, 2008
28,211
9,323
113
Estherville
Here are the records in conference play for our former coaches going back to Johnny:

JO -- 79-117
Floyd -- 30-30
LE -- 42-38
Morgan -- 22-26
McDermott -- 18-46
Mayor -- 49-39
Prohm -- 35-37

I'd say Mayor did pretty well at ISU.

For a program with such historical success, our coaches sure have had a tough go. Two guys over .500 and one if them is barely there!
 
  • Winner
Reactions: aauummm

cycloneworld

Facebook Knows All
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 20, 2006
30,190
22,540
113
Urbandale, IA
Here are the records in conference play for our former coaches going back to Johnny:

JO -- 79-117
Floyd -- 30-30
LE -- 42-38
Morgan -- 22-26
McDermott -- 18-46
Mayor -- 49-39
Prohm -- 35-37

I'd say Mayor did pretty well at ISU.

He definitely did pretty well. But he also left a massive talent hole that caused Prohm to go 4-14 in the league. So conference records are definitely skewed.

Unless you are going to win a regular season title (something he didn’t do with loads of talent), then conference record is pretty much irrelevant and overall success is more important. And as I pointed out, Prohm’s overall success matches Hoiberg’s. Except Hoiberg lost as a 3 seed and Prohm lost as a 6.
 

jsb

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 7, 2008
33,378
39,471
113
Let's go off track and discuss Painter's success.
I'm not aware of him every coming up for mention on other openings - has the media thrown out his name, or has he ever interviewed ?Heck of a coach and impressive record and runs a clean program (relative).
As a thought, after McD left for Creighton, I wondered if we could have had a legit chance?

Isn't he a Purdue alum? It's probably his dream job.

In all seriousness, I think he was looking for jobs several years ago and the Purdue fans were looking to get rid of him.
 

ImJustKCClone

Ancient Argumentative and Accidental Assassin Ape
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jun 18, 2013
61,543
46,581
113
traipsing thru the treetops
Let's say, for the sake of argument, that in 4 years or so Fred Hoiberg is regularly getting beyond the first round in the NCAA tournament and Steve Prohm is not. Should Hoiberg's success at Nebraska be used as a standard for what we should expect from Steve Prohm here? Would it be reasonable to expect Prohm to do at least as well here as Hoiberg does at Nebraska?

I think so. Iowa State has a DEEP tradition and history in basketball. For all the years that we sucked in football, we regarded ISU as a "basketball school". I don't care who is coaching at Nebraska, we should be able to do as well as a school with next to no history in the sport, and which as of right now still has NO NCAA tournament wins.

I think Pollard giving Prohm a contract extension is going to haunt him.
Do we compare Prohm to Bill Self, or Brice Drew, or Tom Izzo, or or or? Fred moved on from us. I see no reason why he should be the gold standard for what Prohm does here. And quite frankly, what makes you think Fred will stay at Nebraska for four years?
 

LutherBlue

Well-Known Member
Oct 19, 2006
2,311
660
113
Here are the records in conference play for our former coaches going back to Johnny:

JO -- 79-117
Floyd -- 30-30
LE -- 42-38
Morgan -- 22-26
McDermott -- 18-46
Mayor -- 49-39
Prohm -- 35-37

I'd say Mayor did pretty well at ISU.
Those conference records scream “deep basketball tradition”