So basically we have created a world where if a player goes from an Adidas AAU program to an Adidas school, it is because Adidas steered them to do it and if they go from a Nike AAU program to an Adidas school it is because Adidas outbid Nike for their services. It's called created alternative facts to fit your argument for a scenario you hope exists.
Should I publish a story about how I have two "unnamed sources" who state that a big bag of cash was the reason Lindell Wiggington went from 100% Oregon in his Crystal Ball prediction the day before his commitment to an Iowa State commit? See how easy this is?
Let's see, the KU athletics department proved that they have no regards for rules during the ticket scandal a few years back and the basketball program is willing to openly push the limits of the rules with the ridiculous basketball "dorm" and hiring of player's parents, but you seem to think that they aren't crossing the lines behind the scenes? OK
Adidas has been paying top players to go to Adidas schools but you seem to think that they aren't doing it for KU which is their flagship college program (based on the recent shoe contract)? OK
KU signs a deal with Adidas starting in 2013 and proceeds to have a top 5 recruit in each of the next four classes after only having one in the previous 5+ classes, but those are apparently the only top recruits that Adidas didn't steer to their colleges? OK
Look, you might want to slow down on your holier than thou attitude until some more details come out, because it isn't a reach to think that KU has a shot to be caught up in this.