anything east of I-35 is not good.
Highly disagree with this statement. Northeast Iowa is the most scenic part of the state and a great touristy area with the Mississippi.
anything east of I-35 is not good.
Highly disagree with this statement. Northeast Iowa is the most scenic part of the state and a great touristy area with the Mississippi.
Is SE Iowa is as depressing as these photos would generally indicate? Nice photography, but some of those pics are like the start to an Eminem video.
And home to a lot of communities less decayed than the ones highlighted thus far.
I can already see where this thread is going. "My part of the state is better than your part of the state".
I am all over the state for some work I do outside of farming and there are very nice and very crappy towns in every part of this state. I find it hilarious when people judge a part of the state based on towns like Sioux City and Council Bluffs but will not acknowledge the lengthy chain of run down towns on the Mississippi river.
What makes Iowa great are the small to medium sized towns that are in great shape and thriving. Each part of the state has towns like this. I'm hoping this guy will also show these types of things instead of just run down buildings.
And home to a lot of communities less decayed than the ones highlighted thus far.
I can already see where this thread is going. "My part of the state is better than your part of the state".
I am all over the state for some work I do outside of farming and there are very nice and very crappy towns in every part of this state. I find it hilarious when people judge a part of the state based on towns like Sioux City and Council Bluffs but will not acknowledge the lengthy chain of run down towns on the Mississippi river.
What makes Iowa great are the small to medium sized towns that are in great shape and thriving. Each part of the state has towns like this. I'm hoping this guy will also show these types of things instead of just run down buildings.
NE Iowa sound AMAZING. I'm sure all of the unincorporated towns there have a rich culture without any sign of a time gone past.
There's plenty of decay in the unincorporated/smaller towns in northeast Iowa.
He's making the larger communities in SE Iowa look like Detroit. I've never been through Keokuk for example, so I can't comment to it's state, other than what he's shown.
Which is kind of to my point that maybe they aren't as bad he makes it look.
I guess it is all how you look at things.. I saw the pictures of Burlington and thought.. Wow that looks like a cool place to visit....
I wouldn't hold out much hope for that. Read the Vice article. He thinks Iowa is basically dead and is planning on getting out after this is done. His viewpoint definitely has a negative skew to it, and that's what the project would likely reflect.
I don't think he's saying Iowa is dead, I think he's saying that a good portion of rural Iowa is dying. Just looks at the population decline of rural towns in the state and it confirms that sentiment. This is also being done from a historical perspective with respect to "These buildings are still here because they have meaning to those who have lived there during the hey day".
If he depicts Des Moines, Iowa City, Ames, Cedar Falls, etc. in the same light as the small towns, then I could see your point. But for the most part, he's really only been through the crappy parts of SE Iowa that are either dying towns or river toilets. It isn't like there's a beautiful picture to paint from where he has gone thus far.
I saw a school the other day in Oakville, Iowa, where the roof had completely collapsed and the foundation was rotting. And it didn't look like anyone had any plans to touch it. I think the reason people don't want to tear these schools down is because they themselves have memories of it. A lot of the residents in these towns are older people and they went to these schools. A few years ago, there was a music store in my town that literally just collapsed, literally just fell down. It was pretty intense. Even with that—luckily no one got hurt, no one was there at the time—the older people in the town were like, "We can't tear these buildings down because they have historical significance." And really what they're saying when they say that is I have a personal attachment to these buildings and I don't want to see this town change.
The buildings aren't just structures; they're part of the town's collective memory.
They certainly are, especially in a small town. If you're in a city, there's development all the time, so you don't really have as much sentimental value for these buildings because there's things coming and going all the time. But there are restaurants in these small towns that have existed since my great-grandparents were children. It's just a staple of the communities, and you don't want to let these things go. You want your grandkids to experience them. I really don't think that people in these communities see these buildings as they are. They see them as they were. So, I want to take photos of the worn-down elements because I think that that is a big part of Iowa's identity. You're not going to remember a shopping mall that looks the same as every single shopping mall in America; you're going to remember these individual structures that each have their own personality. If they stick in your head at all, I think, those are the things that are going to stick.