Hillsides in JTS

What do you want to do with the Hillsides?

  • Keep them - They are a huge part of the "Family Atmosphere" of JTS

    Votes: 97 35.5%
  • Get rid of them - They make JTS look like a HS stadium

    Votes: 101 37.0%
  • I don't care either way

    Votes: 75 27.5%

  • Total voters
    273

cyhiphopp

Moderator
Staff member
Jan 9, 2009
33,276
14,551
113
Ankeny
Jamie Pollard has stated that the hillsides are here to stay but will be used more efficiently. Whatever that means.

What are your thoughts on the hillsides?

I think a lot of us have emotional attachment to them either through personal experience or with our kids, but I know some would rather have the "big time" stadium feel.

I'm mostly curious on the numbers one way or another and peoples reasoning either way.
 

chuckd4735

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 29, 2006
29,606
12,053
113
42
Lee's Summit, MO
I'm fine either way. I truly believe you have to build the fan base starting with kids, and JP has been doing this since he got here 13 years ago, and you see each year how it is paying off. If the hillsides help get more kids to the games, then I think you need to keep them.
 

ClonesFTW

Well-Known Member
Nov 13, 2013
5,564
9,823
113
Waukee
I'm fine either way. I truly believe you have to build the fan base starting with kids, and JP has been doing this since he got here 13 years ago, and you see each year how it is paying off. If the hillsides help get more kids to the games, then I think you need to keep them.

Absolutely. My first memory of Jack Trice was tossing the ball around on the hillsides during the game. If CMC can build a program that would actually require the elimination of that I would be ok though :)
 

SC Cy

Well-Known Member
Jun 30, 2006
3,094
1,223
113
47
Omaha, NE
twitter.com
The idea of the hills is better than the actual hills (in my opinion). Even as a kid I didn't get much use out of them. One incomplete pass and the oblong football is either bouncing into a family or over the fence. Any precipitation and it's a mess.

I voted that I don't care but I'd lean towards getting rid of them.
 

DeereClone

Well-Known Member
Nov 16, 2009
8,281
9,648
113
I don’t care either way.

If we keep them I’d like to see us use it as true overflow seating when the rest of the stadium sells out. Something about empty seats bothers me when there are enough people there to fill them. Plus it’s a cool talking point that we sold out and people want to watch the team so bad they are willing to stand on a hill to watch.
 

CYCLNST8

Well-Known Member
Jul 19, 2008
11,370
13,524
113
Urbandale
www.gimikk.com
I don't think it's worth getting stressed out over. We're building with an eye on the future. If demand requires future expansion, the Jacobson building and hillsides will eventually go away. I think once the renderings come out, people will be quite pleased with the bowled-in look we'll be getting. I'm guessing the Jacobson will essentially be flanked by what looks like filled in corners with grass instead of permanent bleachers. When the stadium is full of people, you won't be able to tell the difference. There should be room on the concourses to add temporary bleachers for big games, possibly pushing max capacity beyond 62,000.

And as I said earlier, if demand warrants it, we may eventually see a mirror image of the south end- perhaps even connecting the upper decks. Jack Trice has the ability to expand well beyond 70,000. In this scenario, I'd love to see club seating installed along the west sideline spelling out "I S U" in the upper deck.
 
Last edited:

MrPeske

Active Member
Apr 11, 2006
514
135
43
59
downtown Des Moines
Umm, they are staying, maybe we should worry about guns & abortion... j/k Hey its going to be sweet, let JP hand it, he's been on a roll for quite awhile. Your feelings matter but mostly to yourself. Go State
 

OnlyCyclones

Well-Known Member
Feb 27, 2017
1,290
1,608
113
I'm fine either way. I truly believe you have to build the fan base starting with kids, and JP has been doing this since he got here 13 years ago, and you see each year how it is paying off. If the hillsides help get more kids to the games, then I think you need to keep them.
Right on. Every good brand builds its most loyal following from a young age. It's cheap and fun for kids, it's the best option for many young families, and you have to serve your youngest and poorest demographic unless you have a monopoly on public interest, like the NFL. Down the road, these are the folks that become passionate donors, followed by their children. That was the case for me.