Consider this:
1. Of the more than 750,000 calls reviewed, 79 were deemed to be impermissible.
2. This was self-disclosed to the NCAA a year and a half ago.
3. Because of the complexity of trying to monitor all phone calls, texts, tweets, emails, etc. the NCAA recently threw it's hands up and decided to do away with these regulations altogether.
Bottom line, it's no big deal.
Any chance we end up on double secret probation?
We won't get in trouble.
My issue is, if we are going to cheat we gotta be All In on it. Go big or go home baby. None of this little stuff. If we are cheating I want 11-1 type records not this 6-6 stuff.
No they didn't.
Actually, the Board of Directors approved the rule change but it was recently overridden by 75 votes from D1 membership. Now it will be reviewed again by the Board of Directors at their May 2 meeting.
I'm not saying, but I'm just saying.
this is bigger news than the NIT. Yet this still isn't big news.WHO will probably lead with this instead of NIT coverage.
Self-Sanctions? Did we offer to sacrifice the baseball team again?
Over? did you say over?
Maybe we can get Grassley involved.I just checked with the guys at the Jewish House, and they said that every one of our answers on the NCAA form was wrong.
NCAA wants hockey in play. Baseball was not enough to sacrifice.Self-Sanctions? Did we offer to sacrifice the baseball team again?
So what does this suggestion of two years probation mean? It looks like a pretty minor infraction and it was self reported, but when it comes to the NCAA and ISU, history would say to throw common sense out the window.