Is it time to move on from Manning??

Replace Manning


  • Total voters
    661

cyclonehomer

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 2, 2019
3,496
5,677
113
30
Agreed. Manning did what I’ve been suggesting as necessary to beat Iowa — spread them out with 3 and 4 WRs and throw to open up the run. Instead of the heavy TE sets like last year. Only issue I had was not going under center on the 2nd and goal from the 1 that ended up in a fumble. I think in both of these first 2 games Manning has done a good job of taking what the defense is giving. Thumbs up so far.
My post history is pretty negative regarding Manning, but I've been pleasantly surprised with the approach this year. Obviously you'd rather have Kolar and Allen on the roster than not but I do think not having multiple NFL (or close) TEs is helping the offense schematically from a play calling perspective. Sorta same with Breece, you'd obviously prefer to have that kind of talent on your team but so far, I think he's doing a better job on early downs by looking to throw more.

We'll see more as the year goes on, but promising stuff so far given the talent lost to the NFL between last and this season.
 

MJ271

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 9, 2012
2,123
2,749
113
Atkins
Red zone play calls were terrible. Game should have been 20-7 at worst. We were moving the ball well on the ground and Dekkers is really effective throwing slants and short patterns over the middle.
I couldn't watch the game, so I can't speak to specific play calls. But it shouldn't be too surprising that a team having success with short passes against a bend but don't break defense is going to struggle more in the red zone. Like Iowa State's bend but don't break defense from early in the Campbell era, it becomes much more difficult for the offense when the field compresses. If the defense doesn't have to worry about the big plays any more, those runs and short passes are easier to stop.
 

ZuriCyclone

Well-Known Member
Nov 10, 2019
3,134
1,737
113
Which better OC would you get compared to manning, who is willing to come to ISU for around a Mil a year.
 

tzjung

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 2, 2007
2,260
1,481
113
45
Ankeny, IA
The idea is that every other play is coming from shotgun and you risk the snap transition not being clean as guys don't really practice it much.

As a philosophy thing I don't mind it, generally speaking it's easier to run from a spread out formation than jumbo, but I do think you should have the ability to do it.
Haha! Your theory doesn't make any sense. If that was the case, why weren't we in shotgun when we had the ball at the half yard line in our own territory. Manning pretty much admitted in that moment that it's safer to do a sneak to get a yard while not losing yardage against a strong defense. By proxy, if that logic takes precedent then we should be ******* QB sneaking every time we have less than a yard to go.

That was the worst call of the day by far. In addition, we almost DIDN'T get a first down in our last drive of the day because we called a timeout that took a QB sneak 1st down off the board to go back to shotgun and then almost NOT get it on the subsequent play (1chain length). Those 2 situations prove a QB sneak is the way to go.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: cayin

andybernard

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2009
3,143
1,588
113
Points 1 and 3 contradict each other. There is a high probability of a safety if we run out of shotgun from inside the 1. That was a good call and with a stud like Downing you are correct that should have also been the call on 2nd and goal from the 1.

They do not contradict each other. It is a play designed for 1 yard. I am saying that it should be used to score a TD from inside the 1. It is a waste of a down to all but guarantee 2nd and 9 from the 2. We were bailed out by an offsides penalty (if I remember correctly).
 

Bader

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jul 25, 2007
7,570
4,660
113
Ankeny
I’d like to see a return to more of the meaningful pre snap motion and jet sweeps we saw with guys like Trevor Ryen, but I don’t really think the play calling is a problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jdolson27

NetflixAndClone

Well-Known Member
Sep 6, 2015
5,628
7,416
113
The State of Hockey
I had issues last year with Manning, but this year I’ve been pretty happy so far. We have been throwing the ball so much more and that 12 min drive will go down in cyhawk lore. I think a lot of it comes down to our improved OL imo. I think we had a weak one in past years that really hamstringed some play calling. I use to complain that we rarely throw it on 1st down but this year it almost seems like we throw to set up the run more often. I much prefer to throw then run instead of run then throw.
 
  • Like
Reactions: t-noah

Thomasrickj

Well-Known Member
Feb 26, 2012
7,870
5,773
113
Arlington, VA
The two yard dump passes were so predictable and never worked yesterday. That was my biggest frustration. Dekkers can run, but he's very hesitant before he starts to run that it won't give us more than a couple of yards. Other than that, the play calling wasn't horrible
 

burn587

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 14, 2006
4,584
5,417
113
Denver, CO
The two yard dump passes were so predictable and never worked yesterday. That was my biggest frustration. Dekkers can run, but he's very hesitant before he starts to run that it won't give us more than a couple of yards. Other than that, the play calling wasn't horrible
Hunter seems to always look to bounce outside instead of getting upfield and taking what is there. That is one area where he’s well behind Purdy at this point in his career.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Steve and cayin

bosco

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2008
9,843
7,730
113
Des Moines
Okay so this one is one insane post....

Did Manning tell Purdy and the receivers and Brock to turn the ball over last year? No. Did he tell Dekkers and Noel to not be not he same page? Or for Dekkers to force the ball into double coverage? Probably not.

Currently we are 2-0, 1-0 on the road in September with Tom Manning. We scored 42 points in September with Tom Manning and had a 99 yard drive and 300+ yards of offense and other than turnovers actually looked fairly competent under Tom Manning. We lead the Big 12 in passing offense last year. None of the turnovers are on Manning because the run was there, it was a fluke. Dekkers / Noel mix up isn't on the coach its on the players. If he had run a double reverse throw back to a eligible Tyler Miller and it was fumbled - THAT'D be on him.

Do I hate some of the play calls? Yes. Do I wish we played with tempo more and took more down field shots and were a tad more diverse in reacting to pressure and what the defense is doing? Yep. Sure do. The one area we were brutal at was 3rd down conversions last year and thus far this year

But for the love of puppy poop - can anyone tell me where exactly the offense has failed so drastically?
2021 Big 12 offensive stats
Pass offense - 1st
Scoring offense - 4th
Total Offense - 4th
Rushing offense - 7th (Disappointing but with 4 guards and a center... 160 yards a game ain't bad)

2020 Offense
Total Offense - 3rd
Scoring Offense - 3rd
Rushing Offense - 3rd
Passing Offense - 6th

2019 Offense
Total Offense - 5th
Scoring Offense - 5th
Rushing Offense - 9th
Passing Offense - 2nd

Yes, we're 8th right now in offense THIS year and 10th in scoring but some of the numbers are incredibly inflated this early on. And again - new QB, new running back, two new offensive tackles and essentially Remsburg will be new as he's been out so long with injuries and while Kansas looks good and played at West Virginia - I'm not sure anyone has faced a defense as good as Iowa's.


If anything we're a average to slightly below average running team would be the big criticism. But other than that - I fail to see where exactly Iowa State is supposed to finish in offense. We don't have at the moment the dudes that Oklahoma, Texas and what not can recruit.

We've finished 5th, 4th and 3rd in total offense and scoring offense the last 3 years. What more is he supposed to do realistically? Again - I have been critical of him for not adjusting quicker, for not being more diverse in getting people the ball - but his resume is pretty dang good when you actually look
Get out. You don't bring in analytics to back up your argument when I have rock solid objective opinion. Noob.
 

clonehome

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2006
1,634
3,056
113
They do not contradict each other. It is a play designed for 1 yard. I am saying that it should be used to score a TD from inside the 1. It is a waste of a down to all but guarantee 2nd and 9 from the 2. We were bailed out by an offsides penalty (if I remember correctly).
Dekkers got at least 2 yards and now they’re starting second down with the QB and RB just inside the goal line as opposed to 5 yards deep in the end zone. As aggressively as Iowa plays I’d say there’s a 50/50 chance of a safety on a typical running play. QB sneak is a fundamental play in that situation and there is certainly nothing wrong with it. It started a 99 yard drive. The offside came right after that play.
 

cayin

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 11, 2006
10,118
10,384
113
ISU offense has come a long way in past few years..

What becomes frustrating is key plays and you scratch your head..

Running QB sprint draw on 1st down inside Iowa 10 yard line vs one of best front 7 in college football...twice..is asinine play calling honestly.

ISU was so good last year in red zone...but it’s a lot new guys this year and maybe TM hasn’t adjusted yet either.
I wasn't against the designed runs, but running to the short side of the field is tough. Plus, Hunter was hesitant, he should have planted and cut inside couple of times and should have gained yardage. I'm sure they will show him that on the film and he will read it better in the future.
 

Thomasrickj

Well-Known Member
Feb 26, 2012
7,870
5,773
113
Arlington, VA
Hunter seems to always look to bounce outside instead of getting upfield and taking what is there. That is one area where he’s well behind Purdy at this point in his career.
Couldn't agree more. He always had to run directly behind Rus and that slows him down too much. The dude is fairly fast. Not sure why he doesn't just take off. I do like how he was very good at dodging the d line in the pocket.
 

cayin

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 11, 2006
10,118
10,384
113
Couldn't agree more. He always had to run directly behind Rus and that slows him down too much. The dude is fairly fast. Not sure why he doesn't just take off. I do like how he was very good at dodging the d line in the pocket.
I watched other QBs do similar plays yesterday and they are patient to a point, they seem to know when to take off. Hopefully Hunter learns to make his move up field a little earlier, especially is there looks like a lot of traffic further to the outside.
 

Steve

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
4,211
778
113
Agreed. Manning did what I’ve been suggesting as necessary to beat Iowa — spread them out with 3 and 4 WRs and throw to open up the run. Instead of the heavy TE sets like last year. Only issue I had was not going under center on the 2nd and goal from the 1 that ended up in a fumble. I think in both of these first 2 games Manning has done a good job of taking what the defense is giving. Thumbs up so far.
The other thing that Manning did very well is not to fall into the trap that Parker's defense always sets. They try to funnel everything into the middle including baiting you into thinking that you can throw intermediate to deep routes over the middle. They have multiple defenders who close on these throws to either jump the route or get a hand on the ball to create a tipped ball interception opportunity. Manning relied on Dekker's arm strength to attack Iowa with out routes.
I'm not as much on the QB sneak bandwagon as many are for two reasons. One is that it is one of the goal line defense's primary focuses. They stack multiple bigs who are hard to move over the ball and usually have at least one unblocked LB and safety ready to stuff the point of attack. The other reason is that you don't go under center enough to be good at it. It's like someone who always drives an automatic car deciding to drive a stick shift in heavy stop and go traffic. We saw this in a game last year when Purdy tried to go under center. The snap was botched and a scoring opportunity was wasted.
 

twincyties

Well-Known Member
Dec 12, 2009
4,564
6,926
113
I couldn't watch the game, so I can't speak to specific play calls. But it shouldn't be too surprising that a team having success with short passes against a bend but don't break defense is going to struggle more in the red zone. Like Iowa State's bend but don't break defense from early in the Campbell era, it becomes much more difficult for the offense when the field compresses. If the defense doesn't have to worry about the big plays any more, those runs and short passes are easier to stop.
I’m talking specifically about a clearly disorganized play on the half yard line where we went out of the shotgun and a wildcat formation in first down inside the 10.
 

great2baclone

Active Member
May 7, 2014
160
180
43
47
The two yard dump passes were so predictable and never worked yesterday. That was my biggest frustration. Dekkers can run, but he's very hesitant before he starts to run that it won't give us more than a couple of yards. Other than that, the play calling wasn't horrible
I agree with this. My only criticism of Dekkers is he needs to be more decisive when he runs. Also on the last touchdown drive (99yd dr) Manning called the perfect call of QB lead draw. Had Hunter followed his block by the RB he would have scored but he tried to go outside. Either way I love the kid. He is going to do great things in the future and everything like fade away throws and running are correctable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: t-noah and Spanky