Dear Lord it was discussed on here and there was a story in the Register. I didn't have a strong opinion either way but it was certainly discussed. I didn't realize it was a stealth issueI'm asking a question: who is the "we" that thought Nader may get benched? You and who else?
Dear Lord it was discussed on here and there was a story in the Register. I didn't have a strong opinion either way but it was certainly discussed. I didn't realize it was a stealth issue
Matt definitely is the most improved. I've been really impressed with Georges improvement on offense. He was already a great collegiate player, but it seems his offensive moves have gone to whole another level.
Yes. There really isn't another option.
Until Nader does it consistently he's not. He's definitely trending upward and has tons of games to win this award. If he plays like the OU game the rest of the way watch out big 12. I love seeing seniors put it all together. Granted, I prefer to see juniors put it all together.I vote Matt as well, but Nader would actually be an option...some games...
Thunderdome battle #1: Roundball vs. Cydkar
Thunderdome battle #2: Dandy vs. AMarner (even though it's guy vs. girl on this one)
Correct. We've moved on.WTF are you talking about? He said something, I asked a question to clarify, and he answered. What's this "vs." stuff?
Not even a question. Easily the most improvedHe is very active on both ends of the floor even when the 3 point shot isn't falling. Good defensive, rebounds well, not afraid to attack the basket. Sometimes he has mixed results when driving but he is getting better in my opinion. Not just a 'catch and shoot' guy.
If junior Thomas could play for freshman Thomas you'd have a point. Most knew he would be better as an upperclassman, but you don't judge what his play then by his play in the future. He has improved into a good Big 12 role player and glue guy, which is what the Thomas fan club always expected, right?Also, maybe people can remember this (they won't) when ragging on a freshman or even sophomore. People improve. That's part of the point of hard work and playing at a higher level.
If junior Thomas could play for freshman Thomas you'd have a point. Most knew he would be better as an upperclassman, but you don't judge what his play then by his play in the future. He has improved into a good Big 12 role player and glue guy, which is what the Thomas fan club always expected, right?
The problem was many were saying he would never be that guy. As he was, was all he would ever be. A lot of shortsighted people on this topic.
Never be a Big 12 role-player and glue guy? Please. Thomas came in with a lot of hype and many refused to believe what he really was.The problem was many were saying he would never be that guy. As he was, was all he would ever be. A lot of shortsighted people on this topic.
He's one of the best three point shooters in the conference and also one of the best defenders. If that's what you mean by "role-player" then sure.Never be a Big 12 role-player and glue guy? Please. Thomas came in with a lot of hype and many refused to believe what he really was.