Kendall Wright: Baylor had no playbook

PabloDiablo

Well-Known Member
Feb 10, 2011
2,862
182
63
42
Omaha, NE
I agree, 6 is not out of the question for Baylor. However, I don't see Baylor winning any more than that. As someone else said, ISU hung 41 on Tech last year with a offence that ranked 90th in the nation for scoring. ISU actually had a wider margin of victory against Tech than Baylor did.

I said that 6 isn't out of the question, but neither is 4 wins. Baylor's problem this year is that they have no defense and the offense took a big hit. ISU scored more against Baylor in regulation than anyone else last year except Texas Tech.

If you figure that Baylor's personal losses on offense will result in even 10 points per game decrease. That is still very respectable average. At that rate, Baylor would have only won 5 games last year. Hell, if Baylor had scored 4 points lower Baylor would have only won 6 games in the regular season.

I wouldn't be surprised to see Baylor miss out on another Bowl this season. I'm not saying that Briles isn't going to keep Baylor on the right track, but this is obviously a rebuilding year.

I agree with your 4-6 range. Their home-away schedule really doesn't favor them much and Tech is on a neutral field in Arlington. They should be able to sneak out of non-con with 3 wins (toughest game should be SMU), but then they have tough going through the Big 12 with their toss-up games on the road similar to our schedule last year. Kansas at home may be their closest to a sure thing win but who knows.
 

djcubby

Well-Known Member
Nov 24, 2006
3,399
173
63
Bondurant
They still have a good o-line, & other athletes & most importantly, Briles. I'd put the over/under on wins for them at 7.5.
Ok, so they have a good O line, a couple of serviceable receivers and a question mark at RB. I don't care if the kid was a 5* recruit, he didn't see the field at Oregon for whatever reason so no one really knows what he can do.

I'd feel comfortable taking the under on that one...
 

CLONECONES

Well-Known Member
Mar 15, 2012
7,614
480
83
RVA
Ok, so they have a good O line, a couple of serviceable receivers and a question mark at RB. I don't care if the kid was a 5* recruit, he didn't see the field at Oregon for whatever reason so no one really knows what he can do.

I'd feel extremely comfortable taking the under on that one...

FIFY
 

BallSoHard4Cy

Well-Known Member
Apr 20, 2012
7,265
1,246
113
Ames
I haven't seen many plays with a lead blocking QB, maybe they didn't have a playbook, but they had to have had PLAYS
 

Sloup

Well-Known Member
Nov 14, 2009
1,188
60
48
35
Ames, IA
I wonder how that affects Baylor players heading to the NFL. I can't imagine learning a new method of learning plays is easy. I guess we'll find out when RGIII starts this year.
 

BallSoHard4Cy

Well-Known Member
Apr 20, 2012
7,265
1,246
113
Ames
I wonder how that affects Baylor players heading to the NFL. I can't imagine learning a new method of learning plays is easy. I guess we'll find out when RGIII starts this year.

He's in the same system, he'll be fine
 

FootballFan2

Member
Apr 19, 2012
40
1
8
Chicago
Baylor is on the move up. As long as Briles is the head coach. Baylor will surprise a lot of people this year. Not sure why since they have great players.
 

acgclone

Well-Known Member
Feb 21, 2007
12,037
3,769
113
Many teams do not have an actual playbill for fear that it would fall into the wrong hands. These offenses are rollout over the course of the entire season. You start with a base offense and add variations throught the year. 300 plays sounds like a lot. It you have about 20 base plays with many variations
 
Last edited:

baylrballa

Well-Known Member
Feb 3, 2007
2,399
146
63
League City
A shot from a baylor practice last fall.

005312_27.jpg
 

nhclone

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 20, 2008
3,625
1,595
113
losing the heismann trophy winner and a first round receiver is going to hurt the program? Great analysis.

...and we have a whole thread about Ubben "not taking chances with his predictions." OP should be working for ESPN, I guess. :)
 

woodie

Well-Known Member
Apr 10, 2006
2,640
86
48
...and we have a whole thread about Ubben "not taking chances with his predictions." OP should be working for ESPN, I guess. :)

briles can step out of his back door and recruit good players. iowa state does not enjoy that luxury-we have to recruit texas,florida, and california to recruit a team of good players..
 

iowa_wildcat

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2008
2,344
819
113
76
Ames
Art Briles has been underrated as a coach for his entire career. He continues to make fools of his detractors. A win is a win regardless if it is by 50 points or by 1 point. His teams tend to do whatever it takes to put a W on the board. Only Vegas and bettors care about the spread.
 

LegendofRodA

Active Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 15, 2011
988
54
28
Des Moines
...and we have a whole thread about Ubben "not taking chances with his predictions." OP should be working for ESPN, I guess. :)

I would gladly accept that position...but to elaborate, my point was that Baylor fans might have us believe that Briles is the reason for success their offense had this past year and while he is a good coach, the talant drop off will be evident next year. Baylor will be lucky to get to a bowl IMO.
 

baylrballa

Well-Known Member
Feb 3, 2007
2,399
146
63
League City
I would gladly accept that position...but to elaborate, my point was that Baylor fans might have us believe that Briles is the reason for success their offense had this past year and while he is a good coach, the talant drop off will be evident next year. Baylor will be lucky to get to a bowl IMO.

outside of one position we are probably more talented everywhere.

granted that is the most important position, but Briles has a decent track record there. Before Griffin. Case Keenum. before that Kevin Kolb.
 

Al_4_State

Moderator
Staff member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 27, 2006
32,445
28,798
113
40
Driftless Region
Visit site
I'm suspending judgment on Briles. If he wins at Baylor w/out RGIII, then he's a damn good coach. His one year w/out Griffin was a trainwreck, and it looks like that team had a similar level of talent to what he fields this year. I suspect that Baylor falls off, but if they don't I think it writes the book on Briles.
 

baylrballa

Well-Known Member
Feb 3, 2007
2,399
146
63
League City
I'm suspending judgment on Briles. If he wins at Baylor w/out RGIII, then he's a damn good coach. His one year w/out Griffin was a trainwreck, and it looks like that team had a similar level of talent to what he fields this year. I suspect that Baylor falls off, but if they don't I think it writes the book on Briles.

our talent when Briles got here was not good at all. I would think that almost goes without saying. We had literally only a handful of big12 level athletes, but it's improved every year and the depth is closer to other big12 teams now.

Next years team is much, much more talented than 3 years ago. Doesn't automatically lead to wins though (I'm looking at you Texas)
 

isukendall

Well-Known Member
Nov 30, 2006
2,446
581
113
Fort Collins, CO
I think people are out of their minds for not jumping off this bandwagon. Why do people think they win 6+ games season? They return a god awful defense, Lose every good playmaker on offense, one being the top player in the nation. I honestly don't see them winning a conference game next season except for maybe KU.

Does CyBookie allow one on one bets?
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron