Posting history can reveal quite a bit about a person, and does lead to impressions about that individual.
If you want my brutally honest opinion, I dont see a program getting some guys with help from a shoe company as any different than speeding. If you dont do those things, you will be passed by by those you share the road with. If you get caught, you pay the fine and get back on the road.
Asking me to be morally outraged over such a nothing burger is to me the same as if I freaked out over hearing you got a speeding ticket, screaming "you could have killed someone".
It's a breaking of a rule that I believe is based in stupidity. Players should be able to get whatever money they can just like every other college student can. .
Since when was the goal of sports PARITY?!? Lack of parity is killing college sports? Just 6 players have won the last 40 men's tennis major tourneys. Parity in the NBA? PLEASE. Hello Lakers/Celtics/Bulls/Warriors. The NFL? Please. Hello Cowboys/Steelers/49ers/Patriots. MLB? How many titles between the Yankees, Cardinals and Red Sox, 47?Mr 44; I emphatically disagree because the cheating and payments are ruining parity at the college level. P5 schools are so stratified and concentrated at the top that it threatens the game. We probably are getting another 'Bama-Georgia vs Clemson Title game....again. The Final 4 will be the same-ole-same-ole (Kansas won't make it because Self can't seem to live up to his seeding). Paying players aint gonna level the field; if anything it's gonna stratify & concentrate the BlueBloods even more. When is this sheit gonna end; Kansas has been cheating before Self was even born:
Wilt Chamberlain Says Boosters Paid Him to Play Basketball for Kansas in the 1950s
Since when was the goal of sports PARITY?!? Lack of parity is killing college sports? Just 6 players have won the last 40 men's tennis major tourneys. Parity in the NBA? PLEASE. Hello Lakers/Celtics/Bulls/Warriors. The NFL? Please. Hello Cowboys/Steelers/49ers/Patriots. MLB? How many titles between the Yankees, Cardinals and Red Sox, 47?
The only people who want parity are fans of teams that never win. The rest of us want to see the best players play and beat the best players.
Sure, doesn't bother me at all. College football is a vastly inferior football product to the NFL that I rarely watch but a Clemson vs. Bama game might be executed at a high enough level to draw my interest. I'd watch more of it than a Wisconsin vs. Boise State game.Tell me you're excited for another SEC vs Clemson matchup?
Allowing the players to get money is in my opinion the right thing to do. If as a result, KU isnt as dominant at basketball then so be it. It's how the sport needs to progress given the current arrangement.Here is a question based on your above response that you might find amusing. Say there are 5 schools willing to take part in the shoe pay for play business model. There are only 5 because they are the only ones willing to speed due to the potential for speeding tickets. The other 295+ schools play by the rules. Now, the rules change and players can now be special perks and bonuses. You have 300+ schools doing the same thing, paying for players, because, honestly, $100,000 per player isn't much to a P5 program, especially if supplemented by deep pocket donors.
Does KU stay at/near the top of the Big 12 if this becomes the norm...where schools like Texas and Oklahoma, which have double (or more) of the KU budget now can flip $100K, $150K, or more at 5 star basketball recruits?
Bonus question...Can KU stay at or near the top of the Big 12 if they stop getting 4 and 5 star players due to being outbid?
Be careful what you wish for...
Self and I haven't had any conversations so I dont have anything to base an opinion off of.Sam Mellinger wrote this week that he sees Self's window either way at 2 years. What are your thoughts?
Parity is athletic socialism.Tell me you're excited for another SEC vs Clemson matchup?
I'm not so sure media enablers will focus much on Ku's malfeasance this season. It's in their interests - Jay Bilas, Seth Greenberg, Dickie V, ESPN generally - that Ku comes out of this without significantly harming their asset value.
Saw Snoop in concert once. The main thing I remember is at one point he rapped "Show me your titties, sh-sh-sh-show me your titties" and without hesitation like 20 girls showed him their titties.
I would expect someone who has Kansas football as their barometer to say this.Sure, doesn't bother me at all. College football is a vastly inferior football product to the NFL that I rarely watch but a Clemson vs. Bama game might be executed at a high enough level to draw my interest. I'd watch more of it than a Wisconsin vs. Boise State game.
I have lived in Missouri, Michigan, Colorado, Maryland, Delaware, Ohio, Indiana and now Nebraska and have had the opportunity to watch good college programs from all over. From a pure play-of-the-game product, it is vastly inferior to the NFL. Which is to be expected. Too many penalties, too wide a disparity in talent between tiers of teams, too little talent from a coaching and play standpoint. My weekend time is valuable to me. I try to watch CFB games and they are typically just too poorly played to keep my interest.I would expect someone who has Kansas football as their barometer to say this.
![]()
I’m trying to figure out which statement is the most moronic...The justification of KU indiscretions, parity is socialism, or college football is a bad product. You can justify KU’s cheating all you want, but you have broken the rules and now you’re crying about the rules. You’re the thief that got caught robbing the liquor store and instead of owning up to your mistakes, you blame society and it’s laws. As far as your precious NFL, it’s popularity is derived from parity and gambling. So you want parity in the NFL, but it’s not OK in college football? I wonder where the NFL would be without the most popular minor league system in the US called college football?I have lived in Missouri, Michigan, Colorado, Maryland, Delaware, Ohio, Indiana and now Nebraska and have had the opportunity to watch good college programs from all over. From a pure play-of-the-game product, it is vastly inferior to the NFL. Which is to be expected. Too many penalties, too wide a disparity in talent between tiers of teams, too little talent from a coaching and play standpoint. My weekend time is valuable to me. I try to watch CFB games and they are typically just too poorly played to keep my interest.
Saturdays turn into good days to take the bike out or do yardwork so I can watch good football on Sunday. But that's just me. To each their own.
1) It's a dumb rule. A majority of the fans polled on the topic (even those who are not fans of teams currently facing punishment for breaking them) agree with me that college players in at least the revenue generating sports should receive some form of monetary compensation.I’m trying to figure out which statement is the most moronic...The justification of KU indiscretions, parity is socialism, or college football is a bad product. You can justify KU’s cheating all you want, but you have broken the rules and now you’re crying about the rules. You’re the thief that got caught robbing the liquor store and instead of owning up to your mistakes, you blame society and it’s laws. As far as your precious NFL, it’s popularity is derived from parity and gambling. So you want parity in the NFL, but it’s not OK in college football? I wonder where the NFL would be without the most popular minor league system in the US called college football?