I understand it that I don't necessarily want to go on the cheap. Since I heard so many good things about LasikPlus, I thought it was good to look into.This is your eyes. Not something to bargain shop around for.
I understand it that I don't necessarily want to go on the cheap. Since I heard so many good things about LasikPlus, I thought it was good to look into.This is your eyes. Not something to bargain shop around for.
Me too. My eyes are -9.5 and -11.5 and I’ve been told there’s no way I can have it. I can’t even wear soft contacts. I use rigid gas perms.
Scheduled to get mine done at Lasik Plus here in KC at the end of the month. I have a few coworkers that had their done at the Lasik Plus in DSM, they agreed that it was well worth it. Not sure what Wolfe is charging, but I was quoted $3,800 for their lifetime plan. And they have a referral program.
i had my lasik done at a mall kiosk back in 2007 for $19.95. Haven't seen **** since
I went to Lasik Plus back in 2012. Got 3 more years to go.I understand it that I don't necessarily want to go on the cheap. Since I heard so many good things about LasikPlus, I thought it was good to look into.
On another note, my sister’s corneas were too thin for Lasik and she had PRK done (they don’t create a flap and laser behind the flap, they laser the outer layer of the cornea). I wouldn’t ever suggest it. She was off work for a week but because her eyes had to heal from what feels like a really bad corneal abrasion and she couldn’t see well enough to work and it took 6 months or longer for her vision to correct itself.
If you use Wolfe, definitely ask them if they have anything that qualifies you for a discount. Hope this is helpful!
I've heard PRK is way better long term for your eyes but the recovery kind of sucks
Modern version of PRK is ASA (Advanced Surface Ablation)...similar to PRK for recovery, but works for those who were told their cornea's are too thin for LASIK or have moderate to severe nearsightedness. For those in their late 40's and up, most are now recommending Refractive Lens Replacement where they remove the native lens and replace with a new lens capable of both near and far vision. They also filter the fluid in the eye, which removes the floaters that everyone has.I don't know if "better" is quite it, but PRK is essentially the only option for certain professions where the potential for eye trama is high. Professional athletes and fighter pilots are two examples I've always been told, and the reason is that PRK doesn't involve the creation of a flap that can potentially become detached. But for most people LASIK is fine and recovery is MUCH easier.
EDIT: just had LASIK myself about 4 weeks ago and it's great (20/10 right now), but my brother-in-law is a pilot and successfully had PRK a couple years back. Sis-in-law is an ophthalmologist, and we discussed it pretty extensively.
If you had Lasik to replace readers you would most likely need to wear glasses the rest of the time. The need for reading glasses as you age is different. It has to do with the lens losing flexibility so it has trouble focusing up close.I'm new to glasses now that I'm well into my 40s... a week away from 49.
I had perfect vision my whole life, so I'm thankful for that. But I can't believe I'm going to have to wear glasses for my driver's license the next go around.
My question is whether to do this now or to wait until age has "stopped" changing my eyes. Maybe that never happens. I can live with the distance vision, but not being able to do anything within 2 feet of my face is ********. I was under my sink replacing my garbage disposal last night and was unable to identify which screwdriver was needed without grabbing readers.
I got tired of contacts. It was always such a relief to take them out at the end of the day. There were also times when I would forget my glasses when I traveled so at the end of the night when I took out my contacts I wouldn't be able to see.Am I the only person that doesn’t mind contacts? I’m -3.25 and -2.50, so not terrible. I just have no desire for lasik. However, if family history holds, in a few years I’ll need reading glasses so maybe I’ll chsnge my mind.
I've never had them, but my poor wife has hard contacts and if we are anywhere the slight bit dusty she is miserable. My son doesn't have any issues, but he's more tolerable and wears soft contacts. Now that I realize how bad glasses are when it's raining, or cold outside, or messing up the hair over my ears, I may ask if I can do contacts the next go around. But I have a slight astigmatism in one eye so not sure how that works. Currently I wear the progressive bifocals so I have +1.25 or 1.50 for reading, but that is quickly not enough... So wearing contacts and readers when I need I think would be the better route.Am I the only person that doesn’t mind contacts? I’m -3.25 and -2.50, so not terrible. I just have no desire for lasik. However, if family history holds, in a few years I’ll need reading glasses so maybe I’ll change my mind.
I remember struggling to put contacts in my eyes at first. After a while it became second nature. You could practically slide them under your three quarter shut hungover eyelids.I have had glasses for 25 years. I tried contacts twice and had too hard of a time getting them in. The last time I tried them, I spent almost an hour and couldn't even get one in. My eyes hurt so bad after that I was miserable. I had a hard time keeping my eyes open enough to get the contact in because I was so touchy about things touching my eye. I didn't mind them when they were in (the people at the eye doctor did it for me), but gave up on my own. Being stuck with glasses makes me want to do Lasik so bad. If I could do contacts, I wouldn't mind it as much.
How long was your recovery after PRK?
Full recovery took about 6 months to get to 20/15 vision, I was near 20/20 the day after. I basically kept my eyes closed for 2 days and didn’t work for 4 days. I didn’t consider it painful, just found my eyes to be ‘gritty’. Then again I find most people are wimps when it comes to pain. Best thing I’ve ever done!
I've never had them, but my poor wife has hard contacts and if we are anywhere the slight bit dusty she is miserable. My son doesn't have any issues, but he's more tolerable and wears soft contacts. Now that I realize how bad glasses are when it's raining, or cold outside, or messing up the hair over my ears, I may ask if I can do contacts the next go around. But I have a slight astigmatism in one eye so not sure how that works. Currently I wear the progressive bifocals so I have +1.25 or 1.50 for reading, but that is quickly not enough... So wearing contacts and readers when I need I think would be the better route.
I have had glasses for 25 years. I tried contacts twice and had too hard of a time getting them in. The last time I tried them, I spent almost an hour and couldn't even get one in. My eyes hurt so bad after that I was miserable. I had a hard time keeping my eyes open enough to get the contact in because I was so touchy about things touching my eye. I didn't mind them when they were in (the people at the eye doctor did it for me), but gave up on my own. Being stuck with glasses makes me want to do Lasik so bad. If I could do contacts, I wouldn't mind it as much.
Lay a towel over the sink to catch them all the times you failIt probably took me an hour and a half at the eye doctor to get my contacts in. A person with more pride would have given up. I’ve heard more stories than you’d think about people (usually men) who can’t figure it out right away and give up in contacts entirely.
I dont go off those numbers but my eyesight was 20/400 in one and 20/300 in the other eye when I had my lasik done back in 2012What were some of your correction strengths before you got Lasik? I would love to get it done but my correction is only -2.5 so it's not terrible. I feel like if I was -4.0 or worse it would definitely be worth the money.