How many times do you need to see the same **** over and over again to realize CPR is not getting the job done?[/QUOT
I have seen enough........Rhoads must gooooooooooooo!
How many times do you need to see the same **** over and over again to realize CPR is not getting the job done?[/QUOT
I have seen enough........Rhoads must gooooooooooooo!
I agree I sure don't see 4 wins....I see a win over KU and that's it for this year........aka another Dismal Paul Rhoads Football Season
Because of a ******* loss in a rivalry game? Some of you are amazing.
Because of a ******* loss in a rivalry game? Some of you are amazing.
Because of a ******* loss in a rivalry game? Some of you are amazing.
It is very stupid to think this is based on one game. Did you not watch the previous 2.5 years (and there were red flags from almost as soon as he was hired)? At this point CPR teams will be incompetent until proven otherwise. So far 0-2.
Until we can run the ball at all, we won't win any game outside of KU, thats the truth. Teams will just rush 4 and drop 7. You cant win at any level of football without a running game and there is no arguing that.
You are correct. They should pay the coaches more while they are coaching instead of paying them a lot once they are fired.
I would like to know what you have watched over the course of the last 26 games that suggests any other than missing a bowl game with 1-4 wins total. I'm not trying to pick at you, just curious as to what gives you such optimism.
If we don't win 6 games Rhoads needs to be fired but I'm not going to throw a fit like a child when we lose one game to a rival like everyone else wants to. That game has never been an accurate representation of either teams seasons so I"m going to wait and watch the next 1-3 games. Pretty much, if we lose either of the next two, Rhoads is gone. I happen to think all three are winnable and if that happens things will quiet down significantly.
I'm not saying we're a good team it all. We may be awful. I'm just not going to use the Iowa game as any sort of indicator.
Texas Tech did it for a long time.
If we don't win 6 games Rhoads needs to be fired but I'm not going to throw a fit like a child when we lose one game to a rival like everyone else wants to. That game has never been an accurate representation of either teams seasons so I"m going to wait and watch the next 1-3 games. Pretty much, if we lose either of the next two, Rhoads is gone. I happen to think all three are winnable and if that happens things will quiet down significantly.
I'm not saying we're a good team it all. We may be awful. I'm just not going to use the Iowa game as any sort of indicator.
Oh, so why are we re-hashing all of the same **** after this loss?
Because the same **** that has been a factor in the losses over the last 2.5 years was a factor in this loss? IMO, the fact that the same nagging problems never get corrected is a legitimate point of discussion regarding the current head coach.
I have always thought Rhoads and the staff he has put together are a good group of coaches, organizationally and in teaching the game. They have never recruited the kind of speed or depth that they need to make ISU a consistent winner, but I disagree these are bad coaches.