look whose having second thoughts ...

canker2323

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2006
1,615
379
83
47
What Cheer, IA
Tom Osborne built up the Cornhusker football program in the late '80s through the mid '90s through liberal use of the NCAA's Proposition 48 eligibility rules, which were enacted in 1986. Apparently, there were legitimate ways to sign what were termed partial qualifiers, for instance, athletes who met either the SAT/ACT minimum, but did not have the grades in HS.

Here is an article from SI in January 1996, which foretold, with startling accuracy, the pending decline of Nebraska football :
Nebraska may win another national title, but the days - 01.15.96 - SI Vault

The Big 8 did not restrict partial qualifiers, but Big Red was forever changed when the Big 12 prohibited partial qualifiers. Nowadays, athletes like this, I presume, are classified as non-qualifiers and are redirected to the Iowa Western CC's of the world.

What lies ahead? Big Red may just recover over the next 10 years. Here's a summary from ESPN's Michael Rothstein from this past summer's dialogue on NCAA reform. Take note of Point 3 regarding accommodation of "at-risk" student athletes, which could provide a crack in the door for the return of Nebraska football:
Big Ten commisioner Jim Delany pitches NCAA reform plan - ESPN
And some speculation from the Husker 24/7 site regarding the same:
Sounds like delany wants to bring back Prop 48

Someone correct me if I'm wrong but ISU, while in the big 8, never allowed partial qualifiers right? Or never allowed very many?

I remember back in the late 80's/early 90's my old man ******** about that
 

weR138

Well-Known Member
Feb 20, 2008
12,187
5,138
113
My favorite part in all of this is that they left to avoid being in a conference dominated by Texas and OU. Since Nebraska left the Big 12 OU's shared title with Kstate in '12 is all those 2 have won.

Lost in a lot of the $$ blindness and giving the finger to Texas was that Nebraska was throwing away all their rivalries. Even in the years they weren't great, the entire country paid attention when they played OU. They left a conference where (even if in their own heads) they could believe they were going to slug it out annually with OU and Texas, for a conference where their direct competition has Iowa, Michigan State and Wisconsin. Nothing wrong with those teams IMO but they view themselves as above that. They got the "blueblood" treatment in the big 12, they are looking up at programs like Michigan, tOSU and Penn State in terms of prestige and it seems like the novelty has worn off, Iowa is the only team that views them as a rival now.

Exactly right. Nebraska is PSU 2.0...a nice B1G program that was formerly great.
 

mikem

Well-Known Member
Jul 27, 2010
3,454
102
63
37
Reading that board, it was interesting to see that the most d-baggy posters were hocks.

Husker fans never had anything against Iowa State, but they are already sick of eastern iowa.


That is because iowa fans think they matter like nebbie.

The delusion of that group is just shameful.

nebbie left the conference because of osborn noone else. he realized that they would never ever catch up to Texas.

So, he thought he would go to that piece of **** of a conference, and dominate. Well, the program is a shell of what it was, so they win a pathetic division, but that is like being the ferris wheel operator at the county fair.

What that move did was solidify all of their other sports, they gained in basketball, wrestling, volleyball (which was already dominant), and the rest.

But he thought he had low hanging fruit with how just ABSOLUTELY TERRIBLE that conference is. But what they didn't take in to consideration was what an outlier they really are. They are the far western school in a conference that is moving east and south. They lost out a lot on the Texas pipeline, and with the improved play in the PAC 12, they aren't getting the skill players out West anymore.

When that piece of garbage dies, there will be a special place in hell for what he did to the citizenry of Lincoln with all of the felons he inflicted on them.
 

cychhosis

Well-Known Member
May 12, 2006
1,635
330
83
68
S.E. Iowa
I doubt Nebby will ever amount to much in the B1G. They have lost their recruiting in Texas & OK and are no longer the Mecca for triple option players. Who wants to go there?
 

isuno1fan

Well-Known Member
Mar 30, 2006
23,300
4,699
113
Clive, Iowa
I think a lot of people are missing the point about UNL, which is; they parlayed football into membership to the CIC. As an alum I would be furious if ISU had such a chance and passed on it.

You guys and your CIC BS. Yes...we are missing out on a great opportunity to have access to a shared database. Whoopie!

Not being in the CIC has done nothing to hold ISU research back. The additional benefits are very limited.
 

CloneDontCare

Well-Known Member
Jul 27, 2009
1,361
114
63
Nebraska fled a controlling husband for a rich abusive @sshole.

Now she's finally realized she's not that pretty, she can't do much better, and what she had before with Mr. Big 12 wasn't all that bad.

We'll take you back, darling. Everyone makes mistakes.
 

ojoe2317

Active Member
Jan 2, 2012
874
28
28
You guys and your CIC BS. Yes...we are missing out on a great opportunity to have access to a shared database. Whoopie!

Not being in the CIC has done nothing to hold ISU research back. The additional benefits are very limited.

I agree - never heard of this and had to look it up. Seems like the other Big 10 schools just threw UChicago an academic bone when they kicked them out of athletics way back in the day.
 

MNCyGuy

Well-Known Member
Jan 14, 2009
11,644
551
83
Des Moines
I agree - never heard of this and had to look it up. Seems like the other Big 10 schools just threw UChicago an academic bone when they kicked them out of athletics way back in the day.

I'm pretty sure that University of Chicago opted to disband it's athletic department way back in the day. I seem to remember reading an article about them basically seeing the writing on the wall for how corrupt college athletics was going to become.

Also, it's been 3 years. I can't believe all the people still so bent out of shape over Nebraska leaving that they would hypothetically favor hurting Nebraska over helping the Big 12 and by extension Iowa State.
 

Bestaluckcy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 25, 2009
2,175
1,612
113
If having Nebraska back could benefit the Big 12 I would be in favor of signing them to an iron clad agreement. If their joining would not help the conference, I would much rather add a Florida State with some recruiting advantages and let Nebraska play with Iowa in a Minnesota bathroom.
 

Wesley

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
70,923
546
113
Omaha
My favorite part in all of this is that they left to avoid being in a conference dominated by Texas and OU. Since Nebraska left the Big 12 OU's shared title with Kstate in '12 is all those 2 have won.

Lost in a lot of the $$ blindness and giving the finger to Texas was that Nebraska was throwing away all their rivalries. Even in the years they weren't great, the entire country paid attention when they played OU. They left a conference where (even if in their own heads) they could believe they were going to slug it out annually with OU and Texas, for a conference where their direct competition has Iowa, Michigan State and Wisconsin. Nothing wrong with those teams IMO but they view themselves as above that. They got the "blueblood" treatment in the big 12, they are looking up at programs like Michigan, tOSU and Penn State in terms of prestige and it seems like the novelty has worn off, Iowa is the only team that views them as a rival now.

Their full BIG share kicks in 2017. They probably gave up money to switch conferences.
 

Rogue52

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 20, 2006
8,970
3,607
113
Cedar Rapids, IA
Late to the party on this one...

If the CIC was so important for academic research, inclusion would not be dictated by membership in an athletic conference.
 

Clonefan32

Well-Known Member
Nov 19, 2008
23,543
25,998
113
There is a suprising presence of insight in those posts from Nebraska finds. Weird.
 

weR138

Well-Known Member
Feb 20, 2008
12,187
5,138
113
You guys and your CIC BS. Yes...we are missing out on a great opportunity to have access to a shared database. Whoopie!

Not being in the CIC has done nothing to hold ISU research back. The additional benefits are very limited.

Late to the party on this one...

If the CIC was so important for academic research, inclusion would not be dictated by membership in an athletic conference.

I think UNL will indeed benefit greatly from CIC inclusion. I never stated we're missing out or that ISU research was being held back but I do think that it's significant enough that if offered inclusion ISU should take it. I think ISU would be better off with it than without it. It's not simply a database and if it can increase research funding for us while creating advantageous partnerships I'm all for it.

Regarding Rutgers and Maryland I think their B1G/CIC inclusion went hand in hand since they fit the profile of the other CIC institutions while adding population centers to the B1G.
 

tonyfil

Member
Aug 25, 2013
48
0
6
Des Moines
Big Ten membership = CIC membership. Pretty clear on their website. The real irony is Neb's loss of their AAU membership the same summer as their admittance into the Big Ten. Which we, btw, are a member of. U of Chicago left athletics after a new college president decided to stop comprising UC admissions for football athletes in 1939.

Surprisingly, I don't miss NU. I'd take Missouri if I had the choice. I was a fan of the Big Ten but their most recent expansion still confounds me. Yes, they are large schools with football and in time perhaps they will grow into the league, but the Big Ten brand I grew up with is no where now what it was. Catch a Purdue game on TV this fall? no? it's ok - they didn't watch either. At least they'll have Maryland to keep them company - pulling in about 38,000 for home games.

To think, too, that OU and Texas could have gone anywhere they choose - and they picked to remain in the Big 12.
 

Die4Cy

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2010
14,972
15,857
113
Delaney wants to break the NCAA. The CIC and the university presidents are the only thing in his way, although that's a significant blockade. Don't be surprised if one day in the distant future if the entire Big 12 is combined with the B1G in some way, and perhaps some others.
 

jdoggivjc

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2006
61,631
23,890
113
Macomb, MI
Delaney wants to break the NCAA. The CIC and the university presidents are the only thing in his way, although that's a significant blockade. Don't be surprised if one day in the distant future if the entire Big 12 is combined with the B1G in some way, and perhaps some others.

As long as that combining includes Iowa State, I don't have a problem with this.
 

surly

Well-Known Member
May 16, 2013
9,690
4,088
113
reservation lake, mn
As long as that combining includes Iowa State, I don't have a problem with this.

if the break ever occurs it will probably include some sort of rationalization of the current conference madness. i could see a midwest league that's essentially the big10 including isu. a great plains league, the old big12, including the nubs and missouri. a northeast league, the old big east with penn state. and so on ...