The Big 10 may not be the greatest conference, but we would love to be in it. And I'd take Nebby back into the Big 12 in a heartbeat, along with CU or CSU.
Speak for yourself on all accounts.
The Big 10 may not be the greatest conference, but we would love to be in it. And I'd take Nebby back into the Big 12 in a heartbeat, along with CU or CSU.
Tom Osborne built up the Cornhusker football program in the late '80s through the mid '90s through liberal use of the NCAA's Proposition 48 eligibility rules, which were enacted in 1986. Apparently, there were legitimate ways to sign what were termed partial qualifiers, for instance, athletes who met either the SAT/ACT minimum, but did not have the grades in HS.
Here is an article from SI in January 1996, which foretold, with startling accuracy, the pending decline of Nebraska football :
Nebraska may win another national title, but the days - 01.15.96 - SI Vault
The Big 8 did not restrict partial qualifiers, but Big Red was forever changed when the Big 12 prohibited partial qualifiers. Nowadays, athletes like this, I presume, are classified as non-qualifiers and are redirected to the Iowa Western CC's of the world.
What lies ahead? Big Red may just recover over the next 10 years. Here's a summary from ESPN's Michael Rothstein from this past summer's dialogue on NCAA reform. Take note of Point 3 regarding accommodation of "at-risk" student athletes, which could provide a crack in the door for the return of Nebraska football:
Big Ten commisioner Jim Delany pitches NCAA reform plan - ESPN
And some speculation from the Husker 24/7 site regarding the same:
Sounds like delany wants to bring back Prop 48
My favorite part in all of this is that they left to avoid being in a conference dominated by Texas and OU. Since Nebraska left the Big 12 OU's shared title with Kstate in '12 is all those 2 have won.
Lost in a lot of the $$ blindness and giving the finger to Texas was that Nebraska was throwing away all their rivalries. Even in the years they weren't great, the entire country paid attention when they played OU. They left a conference where (even if in their own heads) they could believe they were going to slug it out annually with OU and Texas, for a conference where their direct competition has Iowa, Michigan State and Wisconsin. Nothing wrong with those teams IMO but they view themselves as above that. They got the "blueblood" treatment in the big 12, they are looking up at programs like Michigan, tOSU and Penn State in terms of prestige and it seems like the novelty has worn off, Iowa is the only team that views them as a rival now.
Reading that board, it was interesting to see that the most d-baggy posters were hocks.
Husker fans never had anything against Iowa State, but they are already sick of eastern iowa.
I think a lot of people are missing the point about UNL, which is; they parlayed football into membership to the CIC. As an alum I would be furious if ISU had such a chance and passed on it.
You guys and your CIC BS. Yes...we are missing out on a great opportunity to have access to a shared database. Whoopie!
Not being in the CIC has done nothing to hold ISU research back. The additional benefits are very limited.
I agree - never heard of this and had to look it up. Seems like the other Big 10 schools just threw UChicago an academic bone when they kicked them out of athletics way back in the day.
My favorite part in all of this is that they left to avoid being in a conference dominated by Texas and OU. Since Nebraska left the Big 12 OU's shared title with Kstate in '12 is all those 2 have won.
Lost in a lot of the $$ blindness and giving the finger to Texas was that Nebraska was throwing away all their rivalries. Even in the years they weren't great, the entire country paid attention when they played OU. They left a conference where (even if in their own heads) they could believe they were going to slug it out annually with OU and Texas, for a conference where their direct competition has Iowa, Michigan State and Wisconsin. Nothing wrong with those teams IMO but they view themselves as above that. They got the "blueblood" treatment in the big 12, they are looking up at programs like Michigan, tOSU and Penn State in terms of prestige and it seems like the novelty has worn off, Iowa is the only team that views them as a rival now.
You guys and your CIC BS. Yes...we are missing out on a great opportunity to have access to a shared database. Whoopie!
Not being in the CIC has done nothing to hold ISU research back. The additional benefits are very limited.
Late to the party on this one...
If the CIC was so important for academic research, inclusion would not be dictated by membership in an athletic conference.
Delaney wants to break the NCAA. The CIC and the university presidents are the only thing in his way, although that's a significant blockade. Don't be surprised if one day in the distant future if the entire Big 12 is combined with the B1G in some way, and perhaps some others.
As long as that combining includes Iowa State, I don't have a problem with this.