iowa is changing. theyve completely turned over their staff and i suspect that it took his own flesh and blood to finally get through to him in terms of game plan and recruiting.
Every Hawk fan that I've heard criticize the great Captain Kirk has said the same thing. In the end they know Kirk likely wont change and you can't get rid of him because he's the main reason they have/develop all of the NFL caliber talent.
If Kirk would let his OC open it up they could be scary good some years but no matter who the OC is, they usually bend to what KF wants.
It's hard to argue against their recruiting, development, and defensive consistency though.
Please keep this a football thread and don't turn it into a basketball thread. Tks
Every Hawk fan that I've heard criticize the great Captain Kirk has said the same thing. In the end they know Kirk likely wont change and you can't get rid of him because he's the main reason they have/develop all of the NFL caliber talent.
If Kirk would let his OC open it up they could be scary good some years but no matter who the OC is, they usually bend to what KF wants.
iowa is changing. theyve completely turned over their staff and i suspect that it took his own flesh and blood to finally get through to him in terms of game plan and recruiting.
I do get a kick out of ISU fans flipping fb threads to bball, and iowa fans flipping bball threads to football. Its almost a sure thing.
I guess to wrap that thought up, I'll say this. Yes I know last years LBers were arguably the best group Iowa has had in a long time, at least since Hodge and Greenway. But I think Iowa has some talent there. They say Alston is a sponge and know the defense inside and out, and Spearman is a freak. Add in the fact they get to play behind that defensive line and I don't think we will see much of a drop in production out of that group.
The secondary, on the other hand, we don't talk about the secondary.
did you forget 2009's linebacking corps or do you think last years was better?
Anyway, I'm not concerned about the starting linebackers, it's the backups that I wonder about similar to 2010. Injuries happen and Iowa doesn't have a lot of depth there right now which happens when you graduate 3 multi-year starters.
I actually debated with myself to include them or not in that post. I think Angerer really made that group shine. And I would give him the edge over Morris. But man, Hitchens and Kirksey were studs. I think they were definitely better than Edds and Hunter.
Completely disagree. Edds was the best coverage LB Iowa has had as well as one of the most unappreciated.
Ill give you that he was a little better in coverage than Hitch or Kirksey. But it's a lot closer than you may think. He had 2 more interceptions than Kirksey and 6 more PBU. And he bested Hitch by a few more than that in each category. But all the other stats lean pretty heavily in Kirksey/Hitch favor.
Bingo. I think BF is a big reason we are seeing the subtle changes in the way Iowa plays. I think they limped thru that 4-8 year because everything was different, last year we saw it get a little better. Now this year, schedule aside, I think we will see an even better team and better results. I think we are gonna see more that a few opposing teams front lines, on offense and defense, struggle to keep up with how physical Iowa is going to be this year.
Gene Chizik could coach this Iowa team to 8 wins with that schedule.
That really has no relationship with Moneyball at all. They used advanced stats to do things where Iowa is saying things like "kids in the midwest respond different." Stupid comparison.
That really has no relationship with Moneyball at all. They used advanced stats to do things where Iowa is saying things like "kids in the midwest respond different." Stupid comparison.
Whoa, whoa, pump the brakes there pal.