It's nothing against Nader at all.... it's called good coaching.
Some nights you have it and some nights you don't. I think Prohm said in his press conference after the game that it just seemed like Nader was in a funk or something. It wasn't a big deal at all.
Prohm sat McKay quite a bit a couple games before too when he just wasn't himself. That's good coaching. Fred seemed to take more of the approach to keep them out there and they will "come out of it" eventually. I didn't like that approach very much. If there aren't any consequences to your poor playing, then what is the incentive to get better?
Nader has had an amazing year so far up until last night. He'll be fine. Prohm felt he had to go with the guy making more plays and playing better last night. It ended up working. I'm sure Nader would rather have the win than to have played more and got the loss. He better anyway.
Some nights you have it and some nights you don't. I think Prohm said in his press conference after the game that it just seemed like Nader was in a funk or something. It wasn't a big deal at all.
Prohm sat McKay quite a bit a couple games before too when he just wasn't himself. That's good coaching. Fred seemed to take more of the approach to keep them out there and they will "come out of it" eventually. I didn't like that approach very much. If there aren't any consequences to your poor playing, then what is the incentive to get better?
Nader has had an amazing year so far up until last night. He'll be fine. Prohm felt he had to go with the guy making more plays and playing better last night. It ended up working. I'm sure Nader would rather have the win than to have played more and got the loss. He better anyway.