Alabama is an example that playing the actual games doesn’t matter.
If Bama had our schedule and our results they'd easily be top 10.
Alabama is an example that playing the actual games doesn’t matter.
No, but the winner will probably have to face the loser of the B10 game as an away game. Clearly not fair, either.Big 12 Champion will not be left out.
If Bama had our schedule and our results they'd easily be top 10.
Is there a legit site that has SOS type of rankings?
I don't trust anything ESPN puts out for example.
That would not be fair, but it is also an opportunity to shine.No, but the winner will probably have to face the loser of the B10 game as an away game. Clearly not fair, either.
In my opinion no, because all all them have a bias towards the SEC.Is there a legit site that has SOS type of rankings?
I don't trust anything ESPN puts out for example.
I don’t understand why people think reducing the number of conference games improve ISUs rankings, program TV money, fan enjoyment, or the football program in general in any way.I say we go to 7 conf games and say 5 creampuffs are a "good will" gesture to fund FCS and mid major programs. Only half kidding......
I said it because of previous post. I’d assume b12 champion is guaranteed a spot in the playoff and was surprised to hear differently. Sounds like unless unlv pulls and upset we’ll be playing on the road first round?Why does this keep being said/posted?
I say we go to 7 conf games and say 5 creampuffs are a "good will" gesture to fund FCS and mid major programs. Only half kidding......
This only works for SEC/B10, not us. As you saw from this week, we defeated a top 25 team and went up ONE place. ONE. If we had beat a directional doormat, instead, we probably had dropped position.
Oh I was totally tongue in cheek. The major conferences should play at least 10 conf games. If we are going to have 16 team conferences teams need to play way more than just half their conf teams. 10 games would be enough to judge the best teams in the conference. There should never be 5 teams from one conference in the CFP.I don’t understand why people think reducing the number of conference games improve ISUs rankings, program TV money, fan enjoyment, or the football program in general in any way.
I’m often wrong. But I’m going to vainly bump this as a pat on my backAgree with this except I’ll say for posterity, I think SMU is in win or lose. Bama needs SMU to win to keep ACC a 1-bid league. Like bubble teams in the basketball tourney want mid-major locks to win their conference tourneys.