And the fact that the corner, #5 who is extremely quick, had an angle on him and he outran him. The announcers were just astonished from that play on, with the speed and agility of ARob.
It was a great run, great play. But I think a few of you are letting the "iowa" usernames get the better of you and throwing the logic out the window.
Nobody is "holding the run against him". It was a great play and they need to have that threat throughout the year. But, by the same token, it seemed like the rest of the night, that ISU is not going to be able to rely on Arob to
consistently move the chains on the ground. That's all.
The consistency just wasn't there, and I don't think anyone can deny that. Now, it was the first game, and the great thing about first games are, that's typically when you're at your worst.
And consistency was the main thing that stuck out to me watching the game last night. I think for the most part the OP's points were generally on target and taking away what I saw from the game
as a whole is that I think ISU is on target about where they have been targeted (5-7 wins).
But I also saw flashes in segments of the game where if they can put it all together consistently and play 4 quarters, I think they could surprise people and go 8 wins...maybe 9 with all the bounces and then some? Depth may be what ultimately keeps things a little more consistent from what I saw though.