***Official 2018 Transfer Thread***

Doc

This is it Morty
Aug 6, 2006
37,437
21,963
113
Denver


Looks like kind of a chucker, but I don’t mind chuckers because at least they can score. Probably a decent defender considering who he played for. His #1 comp on kenpom is Reed Timmer so that is promising.
 

heitclone

Well-Known Member
Jun 21, 2009
16,629
14,432
113
45
Way up there
Same guy who tweeted this. Nixon played HS at Bolingbrook in Illinois where this Garrison fellow coaches. He also coached Zion Griffin in AAU.



Idk how to link tweets to CF but in his goodbye tweet he mentioned talking things over with his family, AAU and high school coaches before making his decision to leave. Gotta think that gives Prohm a punchers chance.
 

MilehighClone

Well-Known Member
Sep 14, 2007
1,743
329
83
Another one of LE’s guys worth taking a look at is Nico Charvaco. Can rebound and score around the
basket. With some work, has the ability to extend his game out to the edge.
 

Messi

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 25, 2011
8,090
15,529
113
Cedar Rapids


Didn’t put up great numbers at MSU but he was recruited by ISU back when he left Louisiana Tech. Doubt ISU takes a look but the name rang a bell because he was one of the first targets prohm had when he got hired.

 

LLCoolCY

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 28, 2010
10,225
17,707
113
Minneapolis


Didn’t put up great numbers at MSU but he was recruited by ISU back when he left Louisiana Tech. Doubt ISU takes a look but the name rang a bell because he was one of the first targets prohm had when he got hired.



ISU also offered Eli Wright. Highly ranked (#80) Shooting Guard out of KY. I agree Stapleton probably isn't a target but I could see the staff making a call to Eli.

https://247sports.com/Player/Eli-Wright-48785/high-school-163577
 

CyTwins

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2010
80,179
65,792
113
Ankeny


Didn’t put up great numbers at MSU but he was recruited by ISU back when he left Louisiana Tech. Doubt ISU takes a look but the name rang a bell because he was one of the first targets prohm had when he got hired.



Didn't we recruit Eli Wright too?
 

Sigmapolis

Minister of Economy
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 10, 2011
26,972
41,715
113
Waukee
I'd argue 6 for 4 is a problem. You add a Mooney then that bumps someone who has been in the rotation. Chemistry is important to a team.
NWB and Shayok are seniors, Lindell and Lard potential all conference players and THT 35 top recruit won't be losing minutes. I doubt Young 2 year starter, Lewis and Griffin top 100 recruits, and Talley senior would be happy not seeing the floor for player they don't know brought in during the summer.

I am fine with the staff looking at all players including grad transfers but, it isn't as simple as just adding a potential shooter.

Your post makes me feel very good about the long-term health of the program. Little-by-little, Prohm is collecting quite the set of pieces and stack of talent. Yes, Hoiberg left him some good seniors and juniors, but everything we have now is his.

Team dynamics are important. But our backcourt wasn’t nearly good enough last year. Avoiding upsetting guys by depending solely on their improvement seems risky given they’ll be gone after next year anyways.

Imo it’s as simple as adding a player better than what we have. If a guy is good enough to play major minutes and not be completely redundant, you take him,

Depending on the grad transfer, we have a lot of minutes available. Less for Wigginton and NWB. Shayok was a 20 minute/gm guy at UVA. Lewis has a ways to go and THT is a freshman.

Hypothetically, we land Mooney and Wiggington stays.

That gives us a guard rotation next year (for 3.5 spots, assuming Lard starts and Young and Jacobson fight it out to play the remainder) of...

Horton-Tucker
Mooney
Shayok
Talley
Weiler-Babb

Wigginton

The bold ones would be gone after next year. Wigginton would likely be gone, as well.

That is a lot of playing time opening up. If Lewis, Griffin, Haliburton, and the like have a problem with it being behind so many talented seniors, then I hope Prohm tells them to either (1.) get better, earn your spot or (2.) stick around a year and we are going to have a line change. I want you to be ready. In the meantime, I need you to push them in practice to make them better and yourself better for when it is your turn. We would be ready for turnover.

I think that is exactly what Prohm wants and exactly what he was saying when he wanted to "stay old," have experience in the program, and promote from within.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyclone84cowboy

allfourcy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 26, 2012
6,950
2,983
113
Is it just me, or does our fan base stress out more than others do on 'who' might be offended/leave or 'what player' may not get as much playing time as they want if we try and build an even more talented, deep roster to compete with the big boys? I don't care whether Orr, Floyd, Eustachy, Holberg, Prohm, or whatever coach it is, likes to play mostly 6 or 7 guys, it just seems to me that plenty of the elite 8 teams had lots of talent on their bench and it was a 'good' problem to have. Heck, I think Loyola had more consistent perimeter scorers and a deeper rotation than we've had several seasons.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: isutrevman

FinalFourCy

Well-Known Member
Mar 5, 2017
10,449
10,166
113
41
Is it just me, or does our fan base stress out more than others do on 'who' might be offended/leave or 'what player' may not get as much playing time as they want if we try and build an even more talented, deep roster to compete with the big boys? I don't care whether Orr, Floyd, Eustachy, Holberg, Prohm, or whatever coach it is, likes to play mostly 6 or 7 guys, it just seems to me that plenty of the elite 8 teams had lots of talent on their bench and it was a 'good' problem to have. Heck, I think Loyola had more consistent perimeter scorers and a deeper rotation than we've had several seasons.
Prohm’s tried to go farther than 6 or 7, but the talent wasn’t there due to how prolonged the coaching transition was in terms of recruiting.
 

ForeverIowan

Well-Known Member
Feb 23, 2013
1,772
3,129
113
Is it just me, or does our fan base stress out more than others do on 'who' might be offended/leave or 'what player' may not get as much playing time as they want if we try and build an even more talented, deep roster to compete with the big boys? I don't care whether Orr, Floyd, Eustachy, Holberg, Prohm, or whatever coach it is, likes to play mostly 6 or 7 guys, it just seems to me that plenty of the elite 8 teams had lots of talent on their bench and it was a 'good' problem to have. Heck, I think Loyola had more consistent perimeter scorers and a deeper rotation than we've had several seasons.

I agree it's important to worry about the present and stack your roster as much as possible, however, there can be unintented consequences as well. Players like Lewis and Griffin are two giant building blocks for our future. Land a grad transfer like Mooney and they are all but removed from the rotation next year. You can't help but worry about them being POd they were recruited over and transferring out. Even if they stick with the program hard to develop riding the bench. At the end of the day you have to recruit as much talent as possible.
 

CTTB78

Well-Known Member
Apr 7, 2006
9,540
4,518
113
...... Heck, I think Loyola had more consistent perimeter scorers and a deeper rotation than we've had several seasons.

It wasn't the scoring or rotation that I envied with Loyola, but their elite defense and passing. If we can improve in those two areas next year, we'll be in great shape.
 

Sigmapolis

Minister of Economy
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 10, 2011
26,972
41,715
113
Waukee
I agree it's important to worry about the present and stack your roster as much as possible, however, there can be unintented consequences as well. Players like Lewis and Griffin are two giant building blocks for our future. Land a grad transfer like Mooney and they are all but removed from the rotation next year. You can't help but worry about them being POd they were recruited over and transferring out. Even if they stick with the program hard to develop riding the bench. At the end of the day you have to recruit as much talent as possible.

There are going to be acres of playing time open for them the year after next considering that we might lose the entirety of our back court outside of THT.

Transferring and waiting a year would slow them down, not speed them up.
 

allfourcy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 26, 2012
6,950
2,983
113
I agree it's important to worry about the present and stack your roster as much as possible, however, there can be unintented consequences as well. Players like Lewis and Griffin are two giant building blocks for our future. Land a grad transfer like Mooney and they are all but removed from the rotation next year. You can't help but worry about them being POd they were recruited over and transferring out. Even if they stick with the program hard to develop riding the bench. At the end of the day you have to recruit as much talent as possible.

I don't know. Players seem to have such big egos or should I say extreme confidence in themselves, majority of them wanting to play in the league. You wouldn't think they would look at it as "getting recruited over", but I get your point. Would hope they would compete like heck and have an all-in team mindset next season. But I know, they've invested too much to be getting less than desired minutes.
 

allfourcy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 26, 2012
6,950
2,983
113
Prohm’s tried to go farther than 6 or 7, but the talent wasn’t there due to how prolonged the coaching transition was in terms of recruiting.

I realize that. Not blaming Prohm for that, nor disagreeing with a main 6 or 7, especially if that's all you got. Just pointing out that plenty of teams fans don't worry about filling the roster with talented guys if you have a shot at them and may the best guys rise to the top!
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron