***Official 2024 NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament Thread***

Cyrealist

Well-Known Member
Sep 25, 2013
2,781
-2,075
63
69
I think soccer fans get this better than anyone else. A PL team losing to a Championship club in the FA Cup doesn’t validate the strength of the Championship.
A single game has little statistical significance, but if one conference has three of the Elite 8 or half the final 4, most people would take that as an indication that that conference is strong, at least at the top. Likewise if 7 of our 8 teams lost in the first round, people could justifiably claim the Big XII was over-rated. The final test of a conference's strength is how they do against teams from other conferences, esp. on neutral courts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SolterraCyclone

AuH2O

Well-Known Member
Sep 7, 2013
13,022
21,006
113
This is why I think it’s funny when fans get so mad at “late whistles”. A late whistle tells me the ref was watching the play, then processing what actually happened, then blowing the whistle.
100% - I get so tired of fans complaining about late whistles. It is a great thing that refs are blowing the whistle late to avoid anticipation fouls. I'm not sure if it has been a point of emphasis to officiate this way, because it should be, and I'm glad we're seeing more of it in college.

Officiating is still pretty bad in general in CBB, but that's one small step to avoid a few terrible calls.

I also can live with missed fouls. But I hate phantom fouls. Whether it's calling penalties in football or fouls in basketball, I've always been in the camp of "if you call a foul or penalty, you better be damn well sure you saw it."
 

ClonerJams

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 26, 2022
7,163
16,232
113
I know Michigan State hasn't been good all year and they probably shouldn't have been in the tournament, but I'd be real nervous if I was a North Carolina fan.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: cdface and Lexclone

AuH2O

Well-Known Member
Sep 7, 2013
13,022
21,006
113
A single game has little statistical significance, but if one conference has three of the Elite 8 or half the final 4, most people would take that as an indication that that conference is strong, at least at the top. Likewise if 7 of our 8 teams lost in the first round, people could justifiably claim the Big XII was over-rated. The final test of a conference's strength is how they do against teams from other conferences, esp. on neutral courts.
Reality in college sports is that non-con games are the only metric we have prior to the tournament and playoff. It's what, maybe 35% of the total games. Then in all cases a good portion of those non-con games are pretty meaningless blowouts against bad competition. So when you get down to it, before the tournament, there are only a small handful of actual meaningful non-con games that tell us about relative strength of conferences.

So it's highly possible that conference strength projections can be a little off. Now, the Big 12 has clearly been the best league over a decade. There's too much data suggesting this overwhelmingly. But in a given year is it possible that it's overrated? Sure.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: BigCyFan

isufbcurt

Well-Known Member
Apr 21, 2006
27,540
44,507
113
46
Newton
This is why I think it’s funny when fans get so mad at “late whistles”. A late whistle tells me the ref was watching the play, then processing what actually happened, then blowing the whistle.

It tells me the ref was watching the play and if it's a miss they will call a foul and if it is made they won't, which is ******* stupid.
 

keepngoal

OKA: keepingoal
Staff member
Bookie
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jun 20, 2006
39,426
24,746
113
This is why I think it’s funny when fans get so mad at “late whistles”. A late whistle tells me the ref was watching the play, then processing what actually happened, then blowing the whistle.
It's how refs let them play. I have seen it all over the place, it isn't a conspiracy against the Clones.
 
  • Like
Reactions: drmwevr08

herbicide

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 23, 2006
11,305
2,832
113
Ankeny, IA
100% - I get so tired of fans complaining about late whistles. It is a great thing that refs are blowing the whistle late to avoid anticipation fouls. I'm not sure if it has been a point of emphasis to officiate this way, because it should be, and I'm glad we're seeing more of it in college.

Officiating is still pretty bad in general in CBB, but that's one small step to avoid a few terrible calls.

I also can live with missed fouls. But I hate phantom fouls. Whether it's calling penalties in football or fouls in basketball, I've always been in the camp of "if you call a foul or penalty, you better be damn well sure you saw it."
I do think a lot of those 'anticipation' fouls are for things/practices the officials may have warned the offending player not to do anymore. But of course a lot of them are for things like last night too.
 

herbicide

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 23, 2006
11,305
2,832
113
Ankeny, IA
It tells me the ref was watching the play and if it's a miss they will call a foul and if it is made they won't, which is ******* stupid.
Sometimes yes, sometimes no. For instance a borderline call/no call on the floor that would take away a made shot, I am perfectly fine with the ref swallowing the whistle. Generally I don't think a 'foul' should ever directly reward the offending team.
 

cyclones500

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2010
38,858
26,899
113
Michigan
basslakebeacon.com
I hadn't seen the Samford phantom foul live, just watched the replay. Awful. If Timberlake hadn't gone down, I wonder if ref would have called it - sucks because he went down only because of momentum + hand got caught on the rim attempting to dunk.
 

JP4CY

Lord, beer me strength.
Staff member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 19, 2008
74,679
95,761
113
Testifying
Listening to some Greeny this AM on ESPN radio and had a guest on and they said UK is probably ready to move on from Cal. Said he's not very portal friendly.
First name: Oats but said buyout is $18 mil.
Second name: Otz but said buyout is $17 mil.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DSMCy and awd4cy

1UNI2ISU

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2013
9,094
12,217
113
Waterloo
I hadn't seen the Samford phantom foul live, just watched the replay. Awful. If Timberlake hadn't gone down, I wonder if ref would have called it - sucks because he went down only because of momentum + hand got caught on the rim attempting to dunk.
The ref is also way behind the play. No excuse not to be down at the baseline and he hadn't even gotten to the free throw line.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: mharder

AuH2O

Well-Known Member
Sep 7, 2013
13,022
21,006
113
It tells me the ref was watching the play and if it's a miss they will call a foul and if it is made they won't, which is ******* stupid.
That certainly does happen, and it is pretty dumb. But that's not all the late whistles, and not what I'm referring to. The intent is a guy is going up in traffic and refs anticipate a foul and call it right away before they actually see it (or when it turns out to be clean).

There are lots of late whistles that are outside of that situation, and it's a good thing to reduce the number of fouls that are due to anticipating a foul rather than actually seeing it.
 

CoachHines3

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 29, 2019
9,578
19,556
113
Listening to some Greeny this AM on ESPN radio and had a guest on and they said UK is probably ready to move on from Cal. Said he's not very portal friendly.
First name: Oats but said buyout is $18 mil.
Second name: Otz but said buyout is $17 mil.
so theyre gonna pay Cal 33 million to get rid of him and then pay 17 or 18 mil to hire another coach?