*** Official 2025 Chicago Cubs Thread***

cyfanatic13

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 19, 2008
11,533
10,721
113
My issue with that: There is zero ******* chance that ump saw his hand “come off the bag”. He clearly beat the throw so should’ve been called safe on the field. Then they get to use the “not enough to overturn” excuse and you’re just dealt with a stupid call that has a major impact on the game.

But yet again the story of the game is 7-8-9 getting 5 hits and 1-5 going 2-15
 

Pharmacy99

Well-Known Member
Feb 7, 2013
1,995
1,953
113
My issue with that: There is zero ******* chance that ump saw his hand “come off the bag”. He clearly beat the throw so should’ve been called safe on the field. Then they get to use the “not enough to overturn” excuse and you’re just dealt with a stupid call that has a major impact on the game.

But yet again the story of the game is 7-8-9 getting 5 hits and 1-5 going 2-15
I still don’t get all thses hypes about Tucker
 

Clonefan32

Well-Known Member
Nov 19, 2008
23,558
26,010
113
What’s really too bad is that they damn near got me to football season. But now I’m stuck with two weeks of nothing to watch.

I hate the ownership. I hate the FO. But Wrigley stays full so nothing will ever change age.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Ankency

Clonefan32

Well-Known Member
Nov 19, 2008
23,558
26,010
113
It would be a tougher call if PCA wasn't hitting under .100 the past month.
I really don’t care. Just with his speed alone he gives you an infinitely better chance to score a run. Maybe he draws a walk. Maybe he gets an infield single. In either case you can almost guarantee him then getting to second. But instead we get to watch Turners ancient *** pop out to Cf.
 

ClonesTwenty1

Well-Known Member
May 23, 2018
17,930
21,891
113
What’s really too bad is that they damn near got me to football season. But now I’m stuck with two weeks of nothing to watch.

I hate the ownership. I hate the FO. But Wrigley stays full so nothing will ever change age.
they know they have the best fan base in baseball. And they are taking advantage of them in every way.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Ankency

GoHawks

Well-Known Member
Jul 12, 2009
3,842
2,262
113
My issue with that: There is zero ******* chance that ump saw his hand “come off the bag”. He clearly beat the throw so should’ve been called safe on the field. Then they get to use the “not enough to overturn” excuse and you’re just dealt with a stupid call that has a major impact on the game.

But yet again the story of the game is 7-8-9 getting 5 hits and 1-5 going 2-15
You shouldn't be able to say call stands in a play like that. It's either a confirmed out albeit for another reason or overturned. The ump was obviously incorrect in what they saw so why are we just defering to initial call in that scenario? It's 3-3 if that calls overturned.
 

cyfanatic13

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 19, 2008
11,533
10,721
113
You shouldn't be able to say call stands in a play like that. It's either a confirmed out albeit for another reason or overturned. The ump was obviously incorrect in what they saw so why are we just defering to initial call in that scenario? It's 3-3 if that calls overturned.
If I was in charge of any pro sport, I would immediately fix replay by putting three former officials in a replay center, and whatever the majority thinks is the correct call is what is ruled.

I’ve long thought that “play stands” is the biggest cop out in officiating. I’ve umped plenty of baseball and getting into HS football this fall and a large amount of officiating is an educated guess for lack of better words. The amount of 50/50 calls that the ref/ump clearly guessed on but then after review say “not enough evidence to overturn” is just moronic to me.
 

Cyched

CF Influencer
May 8, 2009
38,591
66,691
113
Colorado
If I was in charge of any pro sport, I would immediately fix replay by putting three former officials in a replay center, and whatever the majority thinks is the correct call is what is ruled.

I’ve long thought that “play stands” is the biggest cop out in officiating. I’ve umped plenty of baseball and getting into HS football this fall and a large amount of officiating is an educated guess for lack of better words. The amount of 50/50 calls that the ref/ump clearly guessed on but then after review say “not enough evidence to overturn” is just moronic to me.

I’m torn on this. The “indisputable evidence” is clearly a good faith effort to have some sort of standard of proof. Unfortunately it’s never going to be perfect.

I agree that “play stands” is a cop out, but I’m not sure adding more human bias and subjectivity is the right answer either.
 

chuckd4735

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 29, 2006
29,623
12,059
113
42
Lee's Summit, MO
I really don’t care. Just with his speed alone he gives you an infinitely better chance to score a run. Maybe he draws a walk. Maybe he gets an infield single. In either case you can almost guarantee him then getting to second. But instead we get to watch Turners ancient *** pop out to Cf.
Yeah, his 3 hits, zero walks and and 13 strikeouts in the 33 AB he has had in the month of August earned him a leadoff spot in the 9th inning down a run.
 

ISUCubswin

Well-Known Member
Mar 3, 2011
24,341
7,207
113
My Playhouse
This offense is dead. It’s time for Caissie or MoBaller. Show a little urgency. PCA is absolutely worthless right now and his body language is worse. Happs “hot streak” has been limited to mostly singles and a dong. Tucker needs to breath.