Official NFL network sucks thread

cybsball20

Well-Known Member
Nov 26, 2006
12,735
438
83
Des Moines, IA
It's NFL Network's fault that cable companies won't pay the money to put them on the air? Sounds to me like if cable companies actually cared about what their customers wanted they'd get NFL Network on the air.


Its not that attractive of a product except for a couple of days a year.
 

mustangcy

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
3,918
1,021
113
Bloomfield
one of the nfl network commentators was interviewed yesterday and said that is what happened.

So the NFL network is saying they offered the rights to mediacom to show the game STATE WIDE for free but denied WOI's request to show the game outside the dsm area?

Does that sound right to you?
 

agronclone

Member
Jul 25, 2009
345
8
18
des moines
So the NFL network is saying they offered the rights to mediacom to show the game STATE WIDE for free but denied WOI's request to show the game outside the dsm area?

Does that sound right to you?

i am not sure about the 'state-wide' part of your statement. i did not hear anything on that. i would assume perhaps that they wanted mediacom to only air it in the dm market, but i could be wrong. from what nfl network was saying, they wanted people to see the game on the nfl network, free publicity for a game, but mediacom denied it. woi picked it up. i would assume that the nfl network has to incur some costs with airing the game, so they only wanted to do it in a market that was guaranteed for them to be successful.
 

jtd9046

Well-Known Member
Dec 20, 2006
2,457
39
48
Chicago
Its not that attractive of a product except for a couple of days a year.

I would argue it's a great product. Yes they have a few games every year, but their coverage of the sidelines and locker rooms makes for great shows during the week.

The NFL is a 12 month sport now, and this channel has a ton of viewers as far as cable channels go.
 

CycloneChris

Well-Known Member
Jan 28, 2009
1,645
86
48
Chicago suburbs
I think this thread should have been called "I live in a part of the country that has crappy cable service".

Heck, I don't even live in Iowa and I knew that it was only going to be available in central Iowa.

I'll enjoy watching this game from home, on a channel I don't think sucks.
 

Cycofan1

Well-Known Member
Jan 12, 2009
4,036
100
63
Does Carroll County get it. my grandpa would like to watch the game but we don't know if he gets the game.
 

maui6651

Member
Sep 2, 2008
283
14
18
Cedar Rapids
i am not sure about the 'state-wide' part of your statement. i did not hear anything on that. i would assume perhaps that they wanted mediacom to only air it in the dm market, but i could be wrong. from what nfl network was saying, they wanted people to see the game on the nfl network, free publicity for a game, but mediacom denied it. woi picked it up. i would assume that the nfl network has to incur some costs with airing the game, so they only wanted to do it in a market that was guaranteed for them to be successful.
I have a very hard time believing that NFL Network offered to let Mediacom carry their channel "no strings attached". If they won't let other stations carry the broadcast (KCRG in Cedar Rapids, for instance), I don't see them giving it away to Mediacom.

jdoggivjc said:
It's NFL Network's fault that cable companies won't pay the money to put them on the air? Sounds to me like if cable companies actually cared about what their customers wanted they'd get NFL Network on the air.
I have no desire to pay for Mediacom carrying the station. This is the first time I've had any desire to watch anything on the station, and I don't see that changing in the future. Some cable carriers may be okay with it, but I can't agree with forcing these stations on the basic package. Same way I felt with the Big Ten Network, and same way I'd feel if a Big 12 Network existed.
 

mustangcy

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
3,918
1,021
113
Bloomfield
I think this thread should have been called "I live in a part of the country that has crappy cable service".

Heck, I don't even live in Iowa and I knew that it was only going to be available in central Iowa.

WOI is carrying the game...I have WOI...makes sense to me that I would have got the game. Everyone I know down here thought they were getting the game. I will consult with you next bowl season though. :cool:
 

michaelrr1

Well-Known Member
Mar 30, 2006
8,235
1,895
113
WDM
I love the NFL network. It's great for a football fan. You need to discuss this with your crappy cable service, or get yourself a satellite.
 

michaelrr1

Well-Known Member
Mar 30, 2006
8,235
1,895
113
WDM
I have a very hard time believing that NFL Network offered to let Mediacom carry their channel "no strings attached". If they won't let other stations carry the broadcast (KCRG in Cedar Rapids, for instance), I don't see them giving it away to Mediacom.


I have no desire to pay for Mediacom carrying the station. This is the first time I've had any desire to watch anything on the station, and I don't see that changing in the future. Some cable carriers may be okay with it, but I can't agree with forcing these stations on the basic package. Same way I felt with the Big Ten Network, and same way I'd feel if a Big 12 Network existed.

On WOI news last night, the NFL network offered Mediacom a free preview of the network so the game would be available. Mediacom didn't even respond to the NFL network's offer, so the network contacted WOI to broadcast the game.
 

jtd9046

Well-Known Member
Dec 20, 2006
2,457
39
48
Chicago
The only major cable companies not providing access:

Bright House Networks
Cable One
Cablevision
Charter Communications
Mediacom Communications
Suddenlink Communications
Time Warner Cable

Pretty dang small list if you ask me.
 

maui6651

Member
Sep 2, 2008
283
14
18
Cedar Rapids
On WOI news last night, the NFL network offered Mediacom a free preview of the network so the game would be available. Mediacom didn't even respond to the NFL network's offer, so the network contacted WOI to broadcast the game.
I didn't see the story so I don't know the situation, but it makes no sense that Mediacom would flat out ignore an offer to carry a station for free. My guess would be that there were some heavy stipulations involved.

Again, I don't know the full situation, but neither does anyone but NFL Network and Mediacom.
 

michaelrr1

Well-Known Member
Mar 30, 2006
8,235
1,895
113
WDM
I didn't see the story so I don't know the situation, but it makes no sense that Mediacom would flat out ignore an offer to carry a station for free. My guess would be that there were some heavy stipulations involved.

Again, I don't know the full situation, but neither does anyone but NFL Network and Mediacom.

Good grief! Do I have to repost what the story said? NFL network offered a FREE PREVIEW. Unless one of their representatives was flat out lying on TV, it's not that hard to figure out. Plain and simple, Mediacom hates you.
 

maui6651

Member
Sep 2, 2008
283
14
18
Cedar Rapids
Good grief! Do I have to repost what the story said? NFL network offered a FREE PREVIEW. Unless one of their representatives was flat out lying on TV, it's not that hard to figure out. Plain and simple, Mediacom hates you.

Good grief! Do I have to repeat that I didn't see the story and don't have any information other than common sense? All I'm trying to say is that the NFL Network is in negotiations with Mediacom to carry their station full time, so I take something like this with a big grain of salt. Especially given the negative publicity that Mediacom has garnered because of this.

But since someone said it on TV, it must be true!