Open up the check book, Mr. Pollard

VeloClone

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2010
48,460
39,263
113
Brooklyn Park, MN
At least we can agree we never had Gable as our head coach to lose as we did Sanderson. IF the tape story is true, it's sad, but I suspect it's just more of a good story and Gable more likely left because he was promised he could become the head coach much sooner at Iowa as Nichols wasn't considering retirement anytime soon at ISU. And Cael probably did think he had a better chance to win national titles at Penn State with their great facilities and strong commitment to wrestling, why wouldn't he. He was also watching losing coaches like GMac and Chiz getting extensions and bigger raises than his whole salary while they ran their programs into the ground, why wouldn't he feel slighted? And if comments by you and Veloclone are indicative of what the administration thinks about wrestling, no wonder he left. Again I know the company spin, just not buying all of it. And I see in the register that Fred's salary is #8 out of 10 Big 12 coaches, and that has to change drastically. Keep telling yourself that Fred loves Ames (which he no doubt does) and the money isn't that big a deal to him, but he's got a heart condition and a young family to think of and you need to use whatever influence you have in administration to make sure we don't lose another one of our legends.

What did I say negative about the wrestling program? All I said was that it was shortsighted to cannibalize track & field/cross country to try to throw money at the wrestling program. I think more of ISU Wrestling than you will ever know.
 

Stormin

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
45,474
14,346
113
What Penn state offered we couldn't match. But when your AD (boss) shows a genuine lack of interest in the job you're doing, and when advise an offer received and they say good luck, you don't feel wanted. Cael did advise Pollard of the offer, and Jamie didn't offer any counter proposal. Cael left because of an offer he couldn't refuse, but Pollard did nothing to show him he was wanted, just like Kindig the gymnastics coach.

And seriously posting sanitized articles written years after the facts, and not understanding compensation packages, doesn't really bolster your argument.

In defense of Pollard, he met with Cael and asked what he wanted IIRC. Sounds like Cael had made up his mind. Not sure we were even given the chance to negotiate and get Cael back.

According to this link, Cael cites the abundance of talent within driving distance of Penn State. And talent that had a desire to wrestle closer to home. Cael had lost out on recruits for that very reason. And being at Penn State makes it an easy sell. Cael can pick and choose from immense talent who he wants. It is a slam dunk. With 4 straight national titles, it is hard to argue with.

http://www.pennstatewrestlingclub.org/content/read_news.php?id=372
 

Stormin

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
45,474
14,346
113
Sorry, I was not referring to you with that. There has been one poster who has been linking newspaper articles.

Please accept my apologies for not clarifying that.

I have been posting articles backing up what I have claimed. You have posted NOTHING. You have just made allegations against Pollard that are NOT supported by anything. Just your own beliefs.
 

AuH2O

Well-Known Member
Sep 7, 2013
12,999
20,962
113
Agree, completely, Fred played in the NBA for a decade and was compensated fairly well. I dont think money is the be all end all for Fred. Another big thing is NBA head coach isn't the most coveted job, those spots are a revolving door. If Fred were to leave, it'd be for a GM job or a head coaching job with total control. Fred knows the NBA landscape far too well to get caught up in the coaching meat grinder. With that said, he will get a raise at ISU. Pry several over the next few years.

NBA coaching is one of the worst jobs in all of sports. All the blame when the team loses and little credit when you win. The way the cap and max contracts are set up less desirable markets like Minn are at a real disadvantage, so jumping to the MBA for a job with a team like the wolves would be bad. Offering the same max contract vs a big market where opportunity for marketability is perceived to be much better is a challenge. There is also enough room on the cap that rose top teams can afford multiple franchise players while the rest are left to overpay. The NBA has been both subtly and not so subtly rigged for big market teams to have advantages.
 

rochclone

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jan 28, 2009
5,292
5,592
113
As others have indicated Iowa State will never be able to match the money that the NBA will be willing to offer. All we can do is control our end of the equation. Personally, Fred should be making between 2.5 and 2.75 per year. That would place him 3rd to 4th in conference behind Bill Self and Rick Barnes. People have said it isn't all about the money with Fred. I doubt it is entirely about the money but I can also tell you that as a competitor it will not sit well with a person when they are the 7th highest paid coach in a conference that they consistently finish in the top 4. It just comes down to fairly compensating people for their performance.
 

buf87

Well-Known Member
Dec 15, 2010
12,073
12,425
113
Iowa
I heard Cael went to Penn State and put his name in the hat and it was not Penn State that reached out to Cael
 

im4cyclones

Well-Known Member
Jun 14, 2010
3,937
671
113
Ames, IA
I honestly think that lawsuit is the most overblown thing by the media in recent years. Its going nowhere. Players have the opportunity to play elsewhere if they want (like the d league) and if their services are worthy enough. They just might not offer the benefits that an NCAA program provides, which itself justifies that the payment level is more than adequate.

And it clears hurdle #1...
http://www.cbssports.com/collegefoo...thletes-players-association-wins-case-at-nlrb
 

roundball

Well-Known Member
Dec 8, 2013
5,038
88
48
Iowa City area
All of this talk about wrestling brings up something that I've been worried about, which is that college basketball will eventually be relegated to the same "niche" status as wrestling. I've seen some surveys and articles indicating that the rise in popularity of the NFL and college football has come at the expense of other sports (mostly baseball, but also college basketball).

Basketball is already a few rungs down the ladder compared to football in terms of revenue, emphasis, and popularity for most universities, and I worry that the gulf will just continue to grow with conference realignment, massive TV contracts, increasing capital expenditures, and so on.
 

swarthmoreCY

Well-Known Member
Aug 9, 2008
16,374
736
83
Here nor there

im4cyclones

Well-Known Member
Jun 14, 2010
3,937
671
113
Ames, IA
All of this talk about wrestling brings up something that I've been worried about, which is that college basketball will eventually be relegated to the same "niche" status as wrestling. I've seen some surveys and articles indicating that the rise in popularity of the NFL and college football has come at the expense of other sports (mostly baseball, but also college basketball).

Basketball is already a few rungs down the ladder compared to football in terms of revenue, emphasis, and popularity for most universities, and I worry that the gulf will just continue to grow with conference realignment, massive TV contracts, increasing capital expenditures, and so on.

Basketball will never become a niche sport, in my opinion. Wrestling is (and always has been) for several reasons. It completes with major sports for exposure, athletes, etc. Far more kids have played basketball than wrestling so it suffers from a small number of people with experience/understanding of it. It largely negates the entire female base. Basketball can be done on a playground in parks across the country.

An advantage basketball has over baseball (a sport that has decreased in popularity) is the constant stream of action. In addition, MLB has recognized the struggle with baseball's acceptance in large metropolitan areas because of the lack of diamonds and play areas. They require more space and upkeep than a basketball hoop.

Now, it may not rival football for popularity any time soon. But I don't think it will be regulated to niche sport status.
 

Stormin

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
45,474
14,346
113
I heard Cael went to Penn State and put his name in the hat and it was not Penn State that reached out to Cael

I have no idea on that. I do know that Cael's last contract extension signed a year ago or so pays him an annual salary of $175,000 for this year. Cael was making $137,000 when he left ISU. And supposedly got a small increase above that. IMO, the biggest impact on him leaving was the location of Penn State in fertile wrestling territory and the new $4 million Lorenzo Wrestling Complex that was built in 2006. i.e. Easier to win a National Championship.
 

im4cyclones

Well-Known Member
Jun 14, 2010
3,937
671
113
Ames, IA
Welcome to the first floor of the Willis Tower.

It is not something to consider in offering a contract to Fred. First, it is not going to win, and second, even if it did, the difference between paying your basketball coach $3 million vs $2 million would not matter.

I agree that it isn't going to be a consideration in paying Fred. However this affects ISU, it will also affect every other school. I simply posted the link in response to him saying it was overblown. To say this isn't a big development is a bit short-sighted.
 

roundball

Well-Known Member
Dec 8, 2013
5,038
88
48
Iowa City area
Basketball will never become a niche sport, in my opinion. Wrestling is (and always has been) for several reasons. It completes with major sports for exposure, athletes, etc. Far more kids have played basketball than wrestling so it suffers from a small number of people with experience/understanding of it. It largely negates the entire female base. Basketball can be done on a playground in parks across the country.

An advantage basketball has over baseball (a sport that has decreased in popularity) is the constant stream of action. In addition, MLB has recognized the struggle with baseball's acceptance in large metropolitan areas because of the lack of diamonds and play areas. They require more space and upkeep than a basketball hoop.

Now, it may not rival football for popularity any time soon. But I don't think it will be regulated to niche sport status.

Thanks, I need the optimism sometimes. Two other things that basketball has going for it are that it's played in winter when the opportunity cost of sitting inside and watching sports all day is lower than any other time of year, and that it has probably the most exciting, engaging postseason of any sport. I also wonder if people will start suffering from "football fatigue" in the next decade or two, now that the NFL is spreading their games out over more days of the week, the concussion debate continues, and conference realignment continues to kill rivalries.

It's also interesting that baseball is apparently struggling to gain acceptance in large metropolitan areas since it began as an urban game, played by kids in the streets with makeshift balls and wooden sticks.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron