QB

[bozclone]

QB play is the difference between us and our opponents. Pretty confident that we would have beaten Iowa, Tech, and TCU if we would have just traded starting QBs for the game.

 

[isutrevman]

People on here used to complain about QB rotations messing with the player's heads during the Jantz/Barnett years and wanted Rhoads to make a decision and stick with it. Now fans are demanding it?

 

[Judoka]

People on here used to complain about QB rotations messing with the player's heads during the Jantz/Barnett years and wanted Rhoads to make a decision and stick with it. Now fans are demanding it?

Put in Tiller.

 

[State43]

QB play is the difference between us and our opponents. Pretty confident that we would have beaten Iowa, Tech, and TCU if we would have just traded starting QBs for the game.

The problem is those qbs would probably suck with our staff influencing their behavior.

 

[State43]

People on here used to complain about QB rotations messing with the player's heads during the Jantz/Barnett years and wanted Rhoads to make a decision and stick with it. Now fans are demanding it?

The problem then was they would switch qbs every game in the middle. We are just saying sticking with one guy isn't working and want to see the other guy try. What is the worst that can happen, we lose to #2Baylor?

 

[Judoka]

The problem is those qbs would probably suck with our staff influencing their behavior.

Yeah. Swap for the game, but not before the game, and don't let the staff talk to them other than giving them plays. Under those circumstances I completely agree.

 

[heitclone]

People on here used to complain about QB rotations messing with the player's heads during the Jantz/Barnett years and wanted Rhoads to make a decision and stick with it. Now fans are demanding it?

I think people are just tired of seeing the starting QB make the same mistakes for 3 years. Weird that we'd want to keep playing a guy who has done positive things every time he's been in the game. Do you think it was a good move to keep Lanning on the bench? That the plan was to use him for one big play?

 

[Clonefan94]

I think people are just tired of seeing the starting QB make the same mistakes for 3 years. Weird that we'd want to keep playing a guy who has done positive things every time he's been in the game. Do you think it was a good move to keep Lanning on the bench? That the plan was to use him for one big play?

No matter what, the fact that he wasn't in there for most of the 4th quarter says all I need to know about this staff.

 

[Wesley]

I think people are just tired of seeing the starting QB make the same mistakes for 3 years. Weird that we'd want to keep playing a guy who has done positive things every time he's been in the game. Do you think it was a good move to keep Lanning on the bench? That the plan was to use him for one big play?

With our current qb, we show little semblance that we can rally in the last quarter or overtime. We need to be ahead in the games.

 

[CycloneErik]

That answer made it pretty clear it was mangino. Which also makes it seem like his answer about not centering the kick at Toledo was protecting Mangino and not covering for a mistake by the RB. Seems like Mangino is poking holes in this sinking ship.

Or Rhoads is very adept at making sure to deflect the blame.

 

[Gunnerclone]

Or Rhoads is very adept at making sure to deflect the blame.

I want both fired so it doesn't really matter.

 

[NickTheGreat]

Is there a podcast or an online source for the Cyclone Reaction show?

I've looked before and didn't find one.