Realignment Megathread (All The Moves)

Kinch

Well-Known Member
Sep 19, 2021
5,762
5,859
113
You're not kidding, that's a lot of manual typing.

We have an OCR reader in our pdf software; I will see if I print, scan to pdf, and then OCR, if that will turn it into a spreadsheet.
Interesting if you look at that and compare Iowa with Big 12 schools and extrapolate that to conference championships. Iowa vs. Michigan (conference championship) drew 11 million, Iowa vs. Illinois drew 600,000, Indiana vs. Michigan drew 2.6 million. That means the 11 million that watched the Big 10 champiolnship, were concerned only about Michigan, not Iowa. Compare that to Baylor vs. OSU, over 8 million. Be interesting if the big 10 didn't have either MU or OSU in the championship what that would do for their ratings. Another amazing thing is what BYU adds to the ratings and that there are several combination of games that the Big 12 offers besides OU and Tex that would beat several Big 10 combinations involving Michigan.
 
  • Creative
Reactions: 1776

Daserop

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2011
5,876
2,211
113
The Bebop
This talking point isn’t terribly accurate.

Washington was 4-8 last year. They averaged >62k at home last year.

They closed out the season in the Apple Cup against a 6-5 Wazzu in front of >68k.

Oregon mostly filled Autzen last year. They played Utah in the Pac-12 title game in front of a healthy 56k in Las Vegas. For comparison, OU vs. Oregon in the Alamo Bowl was 59k.
I see someone is cherry picking.
 

1UNI2ISU

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2013
9,037
12,150
113
Waterloo
Interesting if you look at that and compare Iowa with Big 12 schools and extrapolate that to conference championships. Iowa vs. Michigan (conference championship) drew 11 million, Iowa vs. Illinois drew 600,000, Indiana vs. Michigan drew 2.6 million. That means the 11 million that watched the Big 10 champiolnship, were concerned only about Michigan, not Iowa. Compare that to Baylor vs. OSU, over 8 million. Be interesting if the big 10 didn't have either MU or OSU in the championship what that would do for their ratings. Another amazing thing is what BYU adds to the ratings and that there are several combination of games that the Big 12 offers besides OU and Tex that would beat several Big 10 combinations involving Michigan.
You can't make any of those assumptions based off those numbers and examples.

It's nothing more than a lazy dig at Iowa.
 

Daserop

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2011
5,876
2,211
113
The Bebop
This talking point isn’t terribly accurate.

Washington was 4-8 last year. They averaged >62k at home last year.

They closed out the season in the Apple Cup against a 6-5 Wazzu in front of >68k.

Oregon mostly filled Autzen last year. They played Utah in the Pac-12 title game in front of a healthy 56k in Las Vegas. For comparison, OU vs. Oregon in the Alamo Bowl was 59k.

Cool. I can do that too.

Average attendance at Autzen in 2021: 49,468 @ 91.6% stadium capacity. Overall records 10-4
Average attendance at Jack Trice in 2021: 60,704 @ 98.7%. Overall record. 7-6

Sources:
 
  • Winner
Reactions: 2speedy1 and Kinch

psychlone99

Well-Known Member
Apr 6, 2006
2,001
1,328
113
psychlone99.wordpress.com
The thing that cracks me up with this whole "debate" is who are they trying to convince??? This is all a bunch of wasted breath. The only opinions that matter in this are the TV execs, and nobody is going to pull the wool over there eyes when it comes to numbers that matter. The offers will reflect the value of the product, no matter how many media blowhards are deployed to fight the PR battle. Period.
 

BryceC

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 23, 2006
26,462
19,624
113
Looks like they all shared their homework assignment this weekend. Sorry, you're going to have to do it again because you all copied from each other.



They are really pumping right now. You wouldn't trade our troubles for theirs? Their only two marketable schools left are demanding unequal revenue. It's absurd.
 

Gunnerclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2010
75,623
79,906
113
DSM
The thing that cracks me up with this whole "debate" is who are they trying to convince??? This is all a bunch of wasted breath. The only opinions that matter in this are the TV execs, and nobody is going to pull the wool over there eyes when it comes to numbers that matter. The offers will reflect the value of the product, no matter how many media blowhards are deployed to fight the PR battle. Period.

They get the clicks out of it.
 

isucy86

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2006
9,134
7,734
113
Dubuque
If the p12 goes all in on the 1030 est kickoffs, that means Oregon, Washington and Utah will be playing at that time most weeks. It helps those teams but the other teams will get pushed to less attractive time slots, losing the current bump they get from having no power conference to compete with. If the purpose of the league is going to be to try to prop up the best 3 or 4 programs at the expense of the other schools TV numbers, why would the others be interested at all? Their numbers will drop to keep the schools with one foot out the door relevant to the b1g.

If the Pac12 thinks 10:30est is the glory hole, they are crazy. Been smoking too much of the wacky weed!!

For the Pac12 to grow interest, their primary game times need to be something like:
  • 1p CT / 11a PT
  • 4p CT/ 2p PT
  • 7p CT/ 5p PT
  • 10p CT/ 8p PT
And the 10p CT game is never going to be the time slot that's going to draw significant ET/CT interest. Most sane fans aren't staying up til 1:30a to watch a Pac12 game. 10p is great time for having a captive PT audience, but that isn't gong to grow the Pac12.

I would love to see the next Big12 TV contract include a weekly Friday night game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bikeryde

cyatheart

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 18, 2008
9,436
6,944
113
49
They are really pumping right now. You wouldn't trade our troubles for theirs? Their only two marketable schools left are demanding unequal revenue. It's absurd.
Man these guys are really in a different world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WhoISthis

isucy86

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2006
9,134
7,734
113
Dubuque
One thing that is clear is getting a game on ABC, Fox and ESPN certainly boosts ratings.

So on one hand, it is true that playing a late night kickoff is not favorable, all things being equal. However, all things aren't otherwise equal. The Pacific time zone allows for games to be on late on better networks than they would be otherwise.

The question is do the 4 corner schools along with BYU broadcasting on later time slots do better with a conference that in the last year or two watches a lot more football, but reside in Central and Eastern Time zone?

I guess all this arguing about value doesn't really matter. The networks will ultimately make that decision. I'm guessing PAC $ probably have a fair amount of Oregon uncertainty baked in.

I would add CBS & NBC to that list.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron