Realignment Megathread (All The Moves)

FriendlySpartan

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2021
9,627
10,118
113
38
Not as amazing as all but about 6 SEC teams who schedule nothing but patsies in the non-con and can rely on the circle jerkfest of overrating teams, overrating the teams that beat those overrated teams, and massively overrating the strength of the conference. It truly is an unbelievable phenomenon.

Nothing like getting credit for beating a trainwreck like Tamu early in the season but hey, they recruited well, right?
What would fix this would be to not release ratings until week 5/6 but that will never happen.
 

Acylum

Well-Known Member
Nov 18, 2006
14,324
15,011
113
 

BillBrasky4Cy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 10, 2013
17,481
31,793
113
Can you imagine if Yormark pulled Colorado and Arizona...and then that somehow forced in OR and Wash. then ASU and Utah had nowhere to go.....it will never happen, but that would be nuts.
In that scenario the Big 12 would absolutely take all six teams.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: jcyclonee

Jer

CF Founder, Creator
Feb 28, 2006
23,581
23,428
10,030
I wish we could rescind UCF, Houston, and Cinci, and start over with the PAC options.
Considering UCF, Houston, and Cincy have been arguably more successful than most of the Pac 12 schools - without the benefits of being in major conferences - I wouldn't change it. Houston has probably the most untapped potential of any school in the country, while UCF and Cincy have been competitive despite being in lesser conferences. While they'll take a while to adjust, they too have a decent ceiling with growing fanbases compared to the shrinking ones out West. Culturally and regionally, Houston and Cincy fit in perfectly. UCF is a bit of a stretch but they have the Florida connection.
 

TXCyclones

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 13, 2011
11,407
12,623
113
TX
Considering UCF, Houston, and Cincy have been arguably more successful than most of the Pac 12 schools - without the benefits of being in major conferences - I wouldn't change it. Houston has probably the most untapped potential of any school in the country, while UCF and Cincy have been competitive despite being in lesser conferences. While they'll take a while to adjust, they too have a decent ceiling with growing fanbases compared to the shrinking ones out West. Culturally and regionally, Houston and Cincy fit in perfectly. UCF is a bit of a stretch but they have the Florida connection.

I've been to games at Cincy and Houston. Cincy kind of feels "B12-ish", but Houston does not. I've been to UCF, but not for a game, and UCF feels like a typical directional school or massive community college.
 

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
26,822
24,928
113
Not as amazing as all but about 6 SEC teams who schedule nothing but patsies in the non-con and can rely on the circle jerkfest of overrating teams, overrating the teams that beat those overrated teams, and massively overrating the strength of the conference. It truly is an unbelievable phenomenon.

Nothing like getting credit for beating a trainwreck like Tamu early in the season but hey, they recruited well, right?

Agreed. SEC teams talk about all those great teams in the conference. But they don't get into the details of how many of those great teams you actually play.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SEIOWA CLONE

CascadeClone

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2009
10,881
13,966
113
In that scenario the Big 12 would absolutely take all six teams.
I agree that would happen, based on the brands and the overall cementing the foundation of the Big12.

But I wonder at what point you are losing marginal value? The P12 main problem with their media contract is not only "meh" brands, it's also a lack of prime timeslots- there is probably only 1 really good slot, and maybe a couple okay slots (friday night, and 9pm saturday). So the viewership (and value) of most of those games isn't great. That's the problem.

So if you grab 2 teams, you grab 1 game and can take that best timeslot. 4 teams, a 2nd game, is probably OK too. But 6 more teams is 3 more games a week, and that 3rd game might not be much value. Extend the logic, and you can see why a merger doesn't make sense for the Big12 anymore.

IDK, it's interesting.
 

HouClone

Well-Known Member
Sep 3, 2011
2,823
2,192
113
Houston
I agree that would happen, based on the brands and the overall cementing the foundation of the Big12.

But I wonder at what point you are losing marginal value? The P12 main problem with their media contract is not only "meh" brands, it's also a lack of prime timeslots- there is probably only 1 really good slot, and maybe a couple okay slots (friday night, and 9pm saturday). So the viewership (and value) of most of those games isn't great. That's the problem.

So if you grab 2 teams, you grab 1 game and can take that best timeslot. 4 teams, a 2nd game, is probably OK too. But 6 more teams is 3 more games a week, and that 3rd game might not be much value. Extend the logic, and you can see why a merger doesn't make sense for the Big12 anymore.

IDK, it's interesting.
This is the problem with huge conferences. There are only so many linear partners with available time slots. So the big conferences are going to have to be on Thursday or Friday or on streaming. Plus, with a large conference, you are going to have junk games.

Let's say 1-8 Iowa versus 3-6 Indiana. This has the Big 10 Network written all over it. Well, that is already taken with Minnesota at Wisconsin. Ohio State, Michigan, are already on the big networks. Meanwhile, the AAC has 9-0 Memphis versus 9-0 Tulsa for 1st place. They are on ESPN+ while FS1 is obligated to show a Big 10 game which happens to be this Iowa versus Indiana. The casual fan, flipping channels, ends up watching 30 seconds of a 10-3 Indiana win where the Memphis / Tulsa game is much more meaningful.
 

CYCLNST8

Well-Known Member
Jul 19, 2008
11,368
13,517
113
Urbandale
www.gimikk.com
This is the problem with huge conferences. There are only so many linear partners with available time slots. So the big conferences are going to have to be on Thursday or Friday or on streaming. Plus, with a large conference, you are going to have junk games.

Let's say 1-8 Iowa versus 3-6 Indiana. This has the Big 10 Network written all over it. Well, that is already taken with Minnesota at Wisconsin. Ohio State, Michigan, are already on the big networks. Meanwhile, the AAC has 9-0 Memphis versus 9-0 Tulsa for 1st place. They are on ESPN+ while FS1 is obligated to show a Big 10 game which happens to be this Iowa versus Indiana. The casual fan, flipping channels, ends up watching 30 seconds of a 10-3 Indiana win where the Memphis / Tulsa game is much more meaningful.

I would watch EVERY SECOND of that game.

daffy-duck.gif
 

FriendlySpartan

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2021
9,627
10,118
113
38
This is the problem with huge conferences. There are only so many linear partners with available time slots. So the big conferences are going to have to be on Thursday or Friday or on streaming. Plus, with a large conference, you are going to have junk games.

Let's say 1-8 Iowa versus 3-6 Indiana. This has the Big 10 Network written all over it. Well, that is already taken with Minnesota at Wisconsin. Ohio State, Michigan, are already on the big networks. Meanwhile, the AAC has 9-0 Memphis versus 9-0 Tulsa for 1st place. They are on ESPN+ while FS1 is obligated to show a Big 10 game which happens to be this Iowa versus Indiana. The casual fan, flipping channels, ends up watching 30 seconds of a 10-3 Indiana win where the Memphis / Tulsa game is much more meaningful.
10-3 seems like a lot of points for an Iowa Indiana game
 

Allikat

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jan 20, 2018
476
543
93
This would be creating more competition. It avoids the top team playing the bottom teams that end up in beat downs.

But again, just as long as the financial differences are minimal to avoid the lower tier falling behind.
I know my original thought was a little out there but I am a firm believer that the Big 12 can get in the neighborhood of the Big 2 but only if it is creative.

I think Yormark is on the mark with making entertainment a focus, leveraging basketball strength and expanding the fan base.

My theory on the money is predicated that he continues to expand and there might be different payouts based upon football vs. basketball or other income streams.

Specifically to the delta on the two divisions, if the second division at least equals the ACC then that still makes the entire league a destination of choice but with the CHANCE to make more money by getting into the premier division it allows for team at the top of our conference to remain competitive with the sec and big.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: 1776 and tzjung