Realignment Megathread (All The Moves)

jdoggivjc

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2006
61,625
23,880
113
Macomb, MI
But don’t you think if four teams leave the PAC just absorbs the MWC and the exit fees go away? Although that 4 teams leaving scenario would highly likely include Oregon anyway.

Why would the MWC agree to be absorbed by the PAC when the media deal that the MWC has for the future is better than what the PAC currently has (nothing)? Like I said - you're asking smaller schools to take gigantic risks giving up certainties for complete unknowns. And if the one reward is the PAC's guaranteed playoff spot... how long do you think they're going to hold onto that one in the future? The PAC isn't a power conference anymore.
 

Cyghhh

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jul 18, 2022
380
720
93
Solely because they could force a **** load of people into paying for their conference network.

If the Big 12 had a network (like Weiberg tried to do 16+ years ago), then yes, adding schools only because they're in large TV markets would be a good idea.
I've got to think BY is moving in that direction with the LHN moving out, I could see ESPN replacing it with the Big 12 network
 

Scruff

Well-Known Member
Mar 11, 2008
1,022
1,426
113
Coralville, IA
  • Informative
Reactions: Acylum

GTO

Well-Known Member
Mar 25, 2014
29,320
39,904
113
North DFW, TX
mr-bean-waiting.gif
 

jcyclonee

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
23,262
26,176
113
Minneapolis
So far the biggest losers in realignment I can remember...

Idaho and New Mexico State - lost FBS football entirely
USF - briefly in BCS conference, now in group of five
Uconn - briefly in BCS conference, now group of five, chance of coming back. Winning basketball national championships constantly means they probably didn't actually feel any bad effect

Feeling it right now:
Wash St and Ore St - almost certain to dislike new fate
Cal/Stanford - do they even care?

Next round of jeopardy:
Wake Forest and BC - very likely
NC State, Syracuse, Louisville - will a game of musical chairs be unkind to one of them?
I don’t know if they go to 20. The conferences seem really happy at 16. Clemson seems like the obv pick, not sure about FSU.

NCST and VaTech are barely relevant in their own states they add nothing to the media deals of the SEC/Bigten. They don’t just expand to expand
I think you might be surprised if you look at NCSt's football attendance. VT too. In fact VT is probably more popular in Virginia than UVA. Both VT and NCSt have consistently good football attendance. They are both top-75 in academics. NC State probably wouldn't get an invite to either the BIG or SEC but VT probably could get one.
 

Acylum

Well-Known Member
Nov 18, 2006
14,324
15,011
113
Why would the MWC agree to be absorbed by the PAC when the media deal that the MWC has for the future is better than what the PAC currently has (nothing)? Like I said - you're asking smaller schools to take gigantic risks giving up certainties for complete unknowns. And if the one reward is the PAC's guaranteed playoff spot... how long do you think they're going to hold onto that one in the future? The PAC isn't a power conference anymore.
You’re correct that I’m assuming the remaining 6 from the PAC combined with 10 MWC teams would outdo the current $7M/ team (I think)per the MWC media deal. I’m not sure whether that’s a good assumption or not.
 

clonedude

Well-Known Member
Apr 16, 2006
33,035
29,273
113
IMO... UConn will lose out completely if/when AZ agrees to come to the Big 12 because if that happens the PAC is as good as dead.... and so Oregon and WA will be the last 2.

That's what I want to happen anyway! But I think it does make sense.

I'm not sure that BY really even wants UConn (it would only be to please ESPN)... he's just using them to put pressure on AZ to commit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: isufbcurt

NorthCyd

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 22, 2011
21,165
35,732
113
Wilner still has the PAC as a 2.5 favorite for survival rather than extinction. I think his definition of survival and mine are different.


Yeah, I mean what does survival mean? Just like the Big East is still around, the PAC will carry on in some form.
 

Acylum

Well-Known Member
Nov 18, 2006
14,324
15,011
113
The PAC is going to exist. There's no doubt about that but the membership is going to look a lot like a supped up Mountain West.
Agree. There will be something called the PAC. The question is whether they’ll have an AQ spot in the CFP.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1UNI2ISU

exCyDing

Well-Known Member
Nov 29, 2017
5,612
10,107
113
IMO... UConn will lose out completely if/when AZ agrees to come to the Big 12 because if that happens the PAC is as good as dead.... and so Oregon and WA will be the last 2.

That's what I want to happen anyway! But I think it does make sense.

I'm not sure that BY really even wants UConn (it would only be to please ESPN)... he's just using them to put pressure on AZ to commit.
I don't see the logic behind taking UConn right now. Assuming the real stop point is 16 and the B12 has 3 spots and 6 prospects, I think they're probably no better than the 4th best option.
 

Scruff

Well-Known Member
Mar 11, 2008
1,022
1,426
113
Coralville, IA
Right on time, chart boy with a chart: No more losses or 1 more loss is the Pac Surviving... at least another 3-5 years. Significant loss or nuclear option to me is Pac extinction. Most likely to me is the reverse of how he has it.

Sorry if he already blocked you and you can't see this tweet. ;)

 
Last edited:

MugNight

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jul 27, 2021
2,233
4,083
113
The Big East is still around due to their basketball-only schools keeping the league.
BY wants to take Basketball to market separately. Is adding UCONN a way to kneecap the Big East from doing the same thing? Is there a future when a broken ACC has teams like Syracuse and Duke join the Big East? That’s a damn good basketball conference.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron