I’m guessing they end up with Apple. Didn’t Apple make a play at the PAC?Wazzu really really has some AD financial issues. I'm fascinated what happens with them.
I’m guessing they end up with Apple. Didn’t Apple make a play at the PAC?Wazzu really really has some AD financial issues. I'm fascinated what happens with them.
I think that was supposed to be Kliavkoffs golden goose.I’m guessing they end up with Apple. Didn’t Apple make a play at the PAC?
You don't need to deal a death blow to something that is already dead. The Pac 12 as a power conference and any kind of threat to the new Big 12 is very much dead. WSU and OSU keeping the Pac brand and forming up a slightly enhanced version of the MWC doesn't change a thing.Saw an article that said Wash St and Ore St are hoping for $11 million per year in TV revenue out of the reincarnated pac 12. I kind of wish that the Big 12 had added them at a reduced share for that amount, which would have dealt a final death blow to the pac.
H
Is old George still with the PAC or who is running it?I think that was supposed to be Kliavkoffs golden goose.
Is old George still with the PAC or who is running it?
my thoughts too. makes no sense why they wouldn't be unless they think they have some outside shot at joining the leftovers from a serious ACC/B12 implosion.Maybe I missed something, but why would UNLV not be joining this new Pac-12?
The way I have read, is more from the Mt West may be invited/join, just sounded like they had only worked with the first 4, at least to this point.Maybe I missed something, but why would UNLV not be joining this new Pac-12?
Yes, I read that too. Basically they have the same BoR, and like all the schools like that, they will try to force both go together. We know those are not the end all in most of these, but they do add another hurdle that can slow those moves down a bit.Apparently there are some political hurdles to separating UNLV and Nevada-Reno that they are going to have to work through. UNLV is a lock just not immediately.
Typically the BoR lets them go. Cal fought it and ended up getting some money from UCLA, but UCLA still got to go. I also think their BoR was a little bitter because UCLA didn’t run it by them first.Yes, I read that too. Basically they have the same BoR, and like all the schools like that, they will try to force both go together. We know those are not the end all in most of these, but they do add another hurdle that can slow those moves down a bit.
My guess is UNLV is a lock but Nevada may not be, and they are working through things to decide if they want both or not and how it will work out in the end.
I think in your scenario, the ACC would still be in a power position vs the PAC. It's more likely the acc raided this new PAC and the American to stay afloat.
Even if they lose 7 or 8 schools, the ACC would still have 9 or 10 schools that are as big a brand as anyone in the new PAC. Acc would likely grab Memphis, maybe USF or Tulane and whoever they wanted from the PAC to group with their West Coast teams.
How do they stop it? It will be the schools call, same if they wanted to go to the SEC the big ten couldn’t stop it,SEC won't let the bigger brands (UNC and Virginia) get to the Big Ten if full on poaching occurs.
It would be disappointment if at the end of all of this the Big 12 got Pitt, Louisville, Duke, and Syracuse, imo.Very possible but like many things, it depends on how many schools leave and what the networks want.
I think it's possible (though unlikely) that something like this happens:
*B1G adds Virginia, UNC, Notre Dame, Miami
*SEC adds Florida State, Clemson, Virginia Tech, NC State
*Big 12 adds Pitt, Louisville, Duke, Syracuse
You are left with BC, Wake, Georgia Tech, plus SMU/Cal/Stanford in a "league" that might not have any TV deal. All six of those, but at least the last three or four, could be Pac-12 options and the ACC ends up with BC and Wake in the Wazzu/Oregon State position alone and looking for some G5s to team up with.
If I'm UNC and UVA, I'd rather be in the Big Ten than the SEC.SEC won't let the bigger brands (UNC and Virginia) get to the Big Ten if full on poaching occurs.
From what it has sounded like the B1G has had its eyes set on UVA and UNC for a while now. They'd probably have their pick between B1G and SEC and it's anyone's guess which way they'd lean. I'm sure there'd be a lot of pressure on the academic side to join the B1G and the money would probably be a little better, but geographically and competitively getting to play against those elite southeastern brands would be a serious draw.Very possible but like many things, it depends on how many schools leave and what the networks want.
I think it's possible (though unlikely) that something like this happens:
*B1G adds Virginia, UNC, Notre Dame, Miami
*SEC adds Florida State, Clemson, Virginia Tech, NC State
*Big 12 adds Pitt, Louisville, Duke, Syracuse
You are left with BC, Wake, Georgia Tech, plus SMU/Cal/Stanford in a "league" that might not have any TV deal. All six of those, but at least the last three or four, could be Pac-12 options and the ACC ends up with BC and Wake in the Wazzu/Oregon State position alone and looking for some G5s to team up with.
Why do you think that? Theyre not good enough on their own, but as a 4th wheel theyre a decent fit culturally.Also in response to another post SEC is never adding VaTech
Basketball baby.It would be disappointment if at the end of all of this the Big 12 got Pitt, Louisville, Duke, and Syracuse, imo.