RECRUITING: Jeremiah Williams and Hason Ward to visit this weekend

cyclonehomer

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 2, 2019
3,497
5,679
113
30
1.) We do need shot blocking, he's not saying that. He's implying a singular shot-blocker isn't what it used to be in this regard.
2.) Ward isn't handling a traditional post offensive threat without a double. He's more a 4 that has no offense, so he plays 5. I like his defense, but more for guarding ball-screens, 4s, and help defense.
Agree with this. The traditional 5 is rare nowadays but I don't think you'd put Ward on an island against like, Lampkin at TCU.
 

bawbie

Moderator
Staff member
Mar 17, 2006
54,376
47,086
113
Cedar Rapids, IA
Agree with this. The traditional 5 is rare nowadays but I don't think you'd put Ward on an island against like, Lampkin at TCU.
Our defense isn't putting anyone on an island - it's predicated on running help at anyone who dares bring the ball into the lane

I think what this signifies to me is that TJ isn't as concerned/focused on offensive upgrades this offseason as many of us would like - but that he's continuing to focus on defense and attitude when bringing in parts
 

cyclonehomer

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 2, 2019
3,497
5,679
113
30
Our defense isn't putting anyone on an island - it's predicated on running help at anyone who dares bring the ball into the lane

I think what this signifies to me is that TJ isn't as concerned/focused on offensive upgrades this offseason as many of us would like - but that he's continuing to focus on defense and attitude when bringing in parts
This would be an enormous mistake and should worry every single fan if the staff doesn't think it was a problem that should be addressed. Especially after losing Brockington. The defense was top 5? in adjusted efficiency already and didn't finish top half in the conference. I would imagine that's a realistic goal we'd all like to see the team achieve in year 2.

I would be stunned if they take Williams/Ward and don't fill the other spot(s) with a difference maker on offense. Easier said than done, but I have to believe there's a plan in place beyond like just hoping it works out after losing your best offensive player (by a wide margin) from a team with a bad offense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: isutrevman

Halincandenza

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2018
9,434
10,262
113
Seems like an ok get at the 5. Athletic and long that could help on defense and can dunk some lobs from Hunter. Seems like a likely bench guy and if so then that is a good bench get.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: cyclonehomer

WhoISthis

Well-Known Member
Oct 6, 2010
5,620
3,569
113
Our defense isn't putting anyone on an island - it's predicated on running help at anyone who dares bring the ball into the lane

I think what this signifies to me is that TJ isn't as concerned/focused on offensive upgrades this offseason as many of us would like - but that he's continuing to focus on defense and attitude when bringing in parts
The thought cyclonehomer was responding to was he would be able to take traditional posts without a double. I don't know if that's true, even with our defense- there is also a difference between running help to cause havoc, and not being able to defend well without it.

Ward is in theory a competent Big 12 post defender as an experienced player with his length, but I think you're saying his real defensive value is in our system. He is the ideal help man. He is very mobile and can cover a lot of ground. He can help the 4 and recover. He can drop off his man and challenge someone driving to the rim. He can defend ball screens. He can run. In terms of defense, if you have 2-3 of these types on the floor, the court becomes very small for the offense. Judging by adding Jeremiah Williams and interest in Eric Williams/Dennis, plus Tre King and Watson, we're making the court small on that end. It will be fun to watch.

I think it shows TJ wants to maintain, if not slightly improve the defense. It wasn't just the quickest path to rebuilding.

Could it also mean they feel good about AJ? To be elite on defense you need a roster that is good on defense. To improve on last year's offense, we likely need just one more piece. Two with IB gone. Hunter improving could be one. AJ another. Basile would be a third, and pair well with Ward. Incrementally, Williams, King, and Watson all give us things we did not have a year ago on offense, even if not likely to be step-change guys individually.
 

Gibbon

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2013
460
784
93
Ames
With as many fouls as Conditt and Jones racked up last season, having another competent defender down low is crucial to how this team plays defense. Yes, he may be a minimal upgrade compared to Conditt/Jones but he would be a solid role player who would let this defense continue playing how they want to.
 

WhoISthis

Well-Known Member
Oct 6, 2010
5,620
3,569
113
We haven't had an athletic 5 like Ward since McKay (well, maybe Lard). He would be a nice upgrade to the 5 position.
I was just going to bump the discussion about whether TJ would prefer the McKay over others.

Give me a McKay (or a Lard) on all Cyclone teams. if Ward is similar on defense, rebounding, and transition, you can see why we only had one of Jones and Conditt return.

I think both McKay and Lard were more offensively talented then we thought contemporary speaking, since they were in the era in which we played guys like Georges, Ejim, White, Burton, Nader etc in the frontcourt, so if Ward is like that, we're getting a lot better.

Like McKay playing next to Georges, I think Ward would be very complementary next to a guy like Basile or even Kunc. I don't have a good feel for King's game.
 

BACyclone

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 27, 2011
2,318
2,993
113
Reinbeck, IA
I think it's critical for a legit contending roster to have at least one, if not more than one dudes just like Ward on the roster to help fill a JYD role with an athlete. He's going to rebound, defend, cleanup on put-backs... an unheralded role, but I think he'd be at MINIMUM a Conditt replacement with a higher upside potential.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CycloneVet

CloneGuy8

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2017
11,856
23,228
113
40
I was just going to bump the discussion about whether TJ would prefer the McKay over others.

Give me a McKay (or a Lard) on all Cyclone teams. if Ward is similar on defense, rebounding, and transition, you can see why we only had one of Jones and Conditt return.

I think both McKay and Lard were more offensively talented then we thought contemporary speaking, since they were in the era in which we played guys like Georges, Ejim, White, Burton, Nader etc in the frontcourt, so if Ward is like that, we're getting a lot better.

Like McKay playing next to Georges, I think Ward would be very complementary next to a guy like Basile or even Kunc. I don't have a good feel for King's game.
This guy reminds me of a 5 Oklahoma State would have. Probably not a lot of scoring, but has a ton of length that makes it hard to score in the paint.
 

WhoISthis

Well-Known Member
Oct 6, 2010
5,620
3,569
113
I think it's critical for a legit contending roster to have at least one, if not more than one dudes just like Ward on the roster to help fill a JYD role with an athlete. He's going to rebound, defend, cleanup on put-backs... an unheralded role, but I think he'd be at MINIMUM a Conditt replacement with a higher upside potential.
Fwiw, Ward hasn't preformed quite to the level of Lard or McKay, and sophomore Conditt actually had better rebounding and block %s in 16 min/gm (compared to Ward's 20 min/gm).. Where do you get the higher upside potential? He's a senior, so I think what we see is likely what we get.
 

heitclone

Well-Known Member
Jun 21, 2009
16,631
14,436
113
45
Way up there
I'd be content with a gc level of player, especially if the plan is still to add another big. I think it's a upgrade though. It's similar to the Williams signing, he is a safe way to hedge our bets that we can be a similar team to last year. It's just as much about not letting the floor drop as it is raising the ceiling.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cygrads

cyclonehomer

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 2, 2019
3,497
5,679
113
30
I think it's critical for a legit contending roster to have at least one, if not more than one dudes just like Ward on the roster to help fill a JYD role with an athlete. He's going to rebound, defend, cleanup on put-backs... an unheralded role, but I think he'd be at MINIMUM a Conditt replacement with a higher upside potential.
Conditt was a better player offensively this year in the B12 than Ward was at VCU, George shot the ball better, had a better offensive rebounding rate, and generated far more assists. Both guys turned it over a lot, too. Not gonna try to quantify defense through analytics and think Ward will be good in that regard.

Maybe Ward does improve in a new role on a new team, and if he comes to Iowa State I hope he does. I just don't think you can say he'd be at minimum an improvement over George, especially on offense.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: isutrevman

BACyclone

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 27, 2011
2,318
2,993
113
Reinbeck, IA
Conditt was a better player offensively this year in the B12 than Ward was at VCU, George shot the ball better, had a better offensive rebounding rate, and generated far more assists. Both guys turned it over a lot, too. Not gonna try to quantify defense through analytics and think Ward will be good in that regard.

Maybe Ward does improve in a new role on a new team, and if he comes to Iowa State I hope he does. I just don't think you can say he'd be at minimum an improvement over George, especially on offense.

I said he'd be a replacement for Conditt, in other words that Ward would be an equivalent player to him.

My projection for a higher upside is that Ward appears he could actually dribble the ball, more athletic of a body type than Conditt. Conditt was mostly limited to passing out of the post. I just think Ward would fit into what we saw out of the offense a little bit better than did either of our bigs last year -- Ward looks like he would be pretty effective in a high post or P&R action, moving without the ball.

Even if Ward doesn't project "more than" Conditt, I think he could be a great addition and would be a fun guy to watch in a JYD role for the frontcourt rotation. He wouldn't be a starter here, hopefully, whereas we needed Conditt to start normally.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyclonehomer

isucy86

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2006
9,215
7,785
113
Dubuque
1.) We do need shot blocking, he's not saying that. He's implying a singular shot-blocker isn't what it used to be in this regard. Cato used to be able to live in the paint.
2.) Ward isn't handling a traditional post offensive threat without a double. Stockard did a lot of that for VCU. He's more a 4 that has limited offense, so he plays 5.

I really like his defense, but more for guarding ball-screens, the numerous two-4 lineups we see, and for help defense (challenging at the rim the opposing guards and wings). On offense, Conditt and Jones were not really finishers either, so he could help there. I doubt he can distribute at the high post like Conditt, but I think that could be a good thing, if it means we change the offense

If TJ & Staff are recruiting Ward they have a significant role in mind for him. If Ward can guard in space great.

But modern defenses are designed to be pretty flexible. If Ward can guard in space, then that helps by adding another guy who can switch on perimeter screens. But TJ can also design the defense where our post hedges, but then drops back as the post defender.

I agree we might not see our high post offense run through our 5, it could just as easily run through Tre King or Jaz Kunc. Then keep the 5 in the low-post. Based on the guys TJ is recruiting, I think our pace of play will pick-up considerably next year.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron