Roku may end agreement with YouTube TV

Cyclonepride

Thought Police
Staff member
Apr 11, 2006
98,838
62,402
113
55
A pineapple under the sea
www.oldschoolradical.com
I have several Roku's but don't use YTTV. I appreciate their moral stance, but this seems like a bad business take. I don't see how it helps their sales.

Depends on how their customers feel, on balance. I've ditched most Google related things because I don't care for their misrepresentations (some would say lies) about data collection.
 

Cysmik

Member
Feb 25, 2012
82
58
18
I just realized that many people bought Roku TVs with Roku embedded into them...that would suck for those who stream YTTV that way!

I've got a fairly small / cheap Roku smart TV and use it for YTTV. It does have additional HDMI inputs though, so I'm wondering now if it's possible to use an add-on Firestick or similar?

That said, I would consider a switch to Hulu+ if this happened. I've flipped back and forth between the two over the past few years, depending what channels I'm most needing at the time. YTTV removing the regional baseball networks knocked them down a rung on the ladder of relevance for me, but the others don't carry them either. I'll say that while they are more expensive, I much-prefer YTTV's platform and limitless DVR.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyfanatic

bosco

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2008
9,843
7,730
113
Des Moines
I canceled YTTV by choice when they hiked their fee. I’m not sure why anybody would go to the expense of a new streaming device to keep YTTV when there are cheaper and, IMO, better alternatives available on Roku already.

I tried Sling, Hulu and Fubo after YTTV. I am currently subscribed to Fubo.

We mainly have YTTV for live sports and local channels. What are the other services that provide these?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Macloney

cydsho

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 10, 2006
4,374
5,830
113
Omaha, NE
We mainly have YTTV for live sports and local channels. What are the other services that provide these?
Sports wise I didn't see a huge drop off going from YTTV to Hulu but that is going to vary person to person.
And for local, unless you live far from TV broadcaster, an antenna. If it wasn't for sports, I would just use an antenna and then a combo of Netflix, Prime, or Disney+.
If you are old like me you can get dozens of channels via antenna that you can probably find something to watch.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: qwerty

CoachHines3

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 29, 2019
9,577
19,556
113
i like roku

but i like yttv better

i wouldnt like it but would make the switch to amazon fire or some other device than roku.
 

ruxCYtable

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 29, 2007
7,382
4,386
113
Colorado
Got that this morning. Between us and the kids at college we have seven Rokus. Sucks, but more feasible for me to switch providers than equipment. I had intended to check out the new chromecast but I'm not buying seven of them at once!
 

Isualum13

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 27, 2018
2,251
3,060
113
It sounds like the small companies are getting extra scratch providing something the larger carriers provide for free. Not cool, but happy it works for folks

Ass, gas, or grass. Nobody rides for free
I think the money goes to the Watch TV Everywhere people, or at least most of it. Not the local companies. Also, it's only $5 a month to add 4 account, so it's not like they are gouging people.
 

ruxCYtable

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 29, 2007
7,382
4,386
113
Colorado
Interesting that so many streamers on this site tout the ability to quickly change services as one of the biggest benefits, but then when faced with the prospect of Roku dropping YTTV most seem to be thinking they would swap hardware for every TV in the house. Why not just jump to Hulu or Sling or something while you wait for this to work out? Do people just feel the YTTV product is so far ahead of the others now that it is worth the HW cost to keep it?
I'd probably switch to Hulu with Live TV. We already have their service without the live TV. Sucks that their DVR is limited to 50 hours, but when you consider most programming is available via their on demand the next day, I can't see myself DVRing that much.
 

Tre4ISU

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 30, 2008
28,211
9,323
113
Estherville
I feel like the bosses at Directv a few months ago were like, 'whelp, close her up boys, we are done'. But now with rate increases from streaming services and crap like this, they are like, 'holy crap, these idiots are pricing us back into business'.

Yeah, I'm on year 2 of my dish contract and was just assuming I was going to end up moving to streaming. I probably still will but those streaming services weren't going to be that cheap forever. The networks were going to get theirs. By the time December comes around, I might just end up re-upping. My service cost is hardly more than the streaming services but the equipment is what rockets the price up.
 

twojman

Well-Known Member
Jun 1, 2006
7,765
3,948
113
Clive
Plus the sharing capabilities of the streaming services increase the overall value. The price point could go up to even double what it is, but you can share your account with another household and split the cost, like my wife and I do with her Dad, and still be absolutely scoring a better deal than the satellite/cable companies.
You mean like stealing?
 

Tre4ISU

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 30, 2008
28,211
9,323
113
Estherville
I also cancelled my streaming service after the NCAA Tournament. I would have kept if they offered Marquee Network, but they didn't. I see that FuboTV added Marquee Network, so maybe I will buy that later in summer.

I was excited about the prospect of streaming TV services 3-4 years ago because I viewed them as competition for cable and dish services. They were great in the beginning because they were reasonably priced at $30-$40/month. However, in a few years they have adopted the cable & dish models: consistently increasing prices (they are now $60-$70) and provide around 80 channels of which 70 I never watch.

With the advent of Netflix, Disney, Prime, YouTube, Vimeo and other streaming video providers I feel services like YouTubeTV, Hulu, Sling and Fubo will be gone within 5-10 years. Other than sporting events the idea of watching a TV program at a specific time is becoming antiquated. The On-Demand model is the future. I would much rather buy a platform like Netflix or Prime where I can then purchase add-on focused content providers like ESPN, National Geographic, HBO or Marquee Network. IMO that brings accountability to ESPN or HBO to cost effectively create their content.

My problem is the golf channel. There is no way to get that without a provider. Get me that on demand at NBC sports and let me watch live ESPN stuff through + and I'd be golden. They also know all of this.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: isucy86

Tre4ISU

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 30, 2008
28,211
9,323
113
Estherville
Plus the sharing capabilities of the streaming services increase the overall value. The price point could go up to even double what it is, but you can share your account with another household and split the cost, like my wife and I do with her Dad, and still be absolutely scoring a better deal than the satellite/cable companies.

I can't wait until they nuke peoples ability to do this.
 

aeroclone

Well-Known Member
Oct 30, 2006
10,370
7,190
113
Got that this morning. Between us and the kids at college we have seven Rokus. Sucks, but more feasible for me to switch providers than equipment. I had intended to check out the new chromecast but I'm not buying seven of them at once!

I assume this will be the more common customer response. Especially since I would expect this to be temporary. YTTV isn't going to walk away from the largest streaming platform forever.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: ruxCYtable

jdcyclone19

Well-Known Member
Apr 14, 2017
3,548
4,876
113
Iowa
Google responds playing the victim.

 
  • Informative
Reactions: Cyclonepride

KCyclone2010

Well-Known Member
May 19, 2017
705
1,508
93
YouTube TV by far has the best interface of all the streaming services, and the unlimited DVR is nice. I have all Roku's, so I really hope they come to an agreement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 06_CY and dabears32

bosco

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2008
9,843
7,730
113
Des Moines
Sports wise I didn't see a huge drop off going from YTTV to Hulu but that is going to vary person to person.
And for local, unless you live far from TV broadcaster, an antenna. If it wasn't for sports, I would just use an antenna and then a combo of Netflix, Prime, or Disney+.
If you are old like me you can get dozens of channels via antenna that you can probably find something to watch.
If it was just me this is the way I would go but gotta keep the others happy.