Scotty vs Allen & Babb to start next year

Rapplegt

Member
Apr 7, 2006
88
23
8
Help me out. Nearly every post about next year's team shows Scotty not starting and usually Babb & Allen both starting. Often this is stated as a given. I am a big Scotty fan! I probably saw Babb & Allen play, but have no recollection of either. So, looking at the stats that are available, plus my own bias, it seems to me Scotty has a very good shot at starting, even if he does not improve. (I'm confident he will continue to improve.) Here are the figures:

Scotty: 35.2 min/gm; Shooting - 132-300 44% 3-pt-75-166 45.2% FT-29-36 80.6%; 3.1 rb/gm; 57 asst/41 TO; 18 steals; 14.2 pt/gm; 40 consecutive games with a 3-pt made.
Allen 2009/10 @Mich St - Started 27 games and averaged 8.2 points to help the Spartans reach their second consecutive Final Four...led the team in 3-pointers made with 53, connecting on 39.8 percent of his shots from downtown...averaged 2.8 rebounds and was third on the team in assists with 73...scored a career-high 22 points vs. Valparaiso and had 21 points vs. Purdue...had 15 double-digit scoring efforts...tallied six games with four 3-pointers...ended his Michigan State career with the 10th-most 3-pointers made in Spartan history with 141.
Babb 2009/10 @PS - averaging 9.3 points and 3.2 rebounds...was third on the team in assists (69) and steals (22)...made the second-most 3-pointers on the team, hitting 69-of-185 (37.3 percent) from beyond the arc...led the team at the free-throw line, making 81.6 percent of his foul shots (40-49 FT)...finished strong, making 48.8 percent from 3-point range (21-43 3FG) in his last seven games...had nine games with four or more treys...averaged 10.2 points while starting all 18 Big Ten games...posted a career-high 20 points in an 81-70 win at Northwestern.

Scotty continues to score 5-6 points higher than either Allen or Babb did. He is targeted by the opposing coach every game and has someone chasing him throughout. He gets little rest, so he may not have fresh legs, yet is hitting a higher % of his 3s while shooting more this year than the other 2 did combined. He should end the year with @as many assists as Allen had. His defense is faulted. There aren't many stats, but he should end the year with as many, if not more, steals than Babb had last year. (BTW we already have 4 players with 22+ steals so far this year. 22 for the year is not an impressive indicator of defensive skill.)

My bottom line is, I like his chances of starting. He's tough, a hell of a competitor and a terrific 3-point shooter. Babb and/or Allen may end up starting over Scotty, but it's certainly not a given, unless one's playing point. If they do, that's a good thing. It will show we have improved our talent greatly over this year, since we really have no one competing for playing time with Scotty this year.
 

Cyforce

Well-Known Member
Nov 24, 2009
17,220
13,064
113
Des Moines
I think we'll scorewith any number of lineups. How they play D will determine who starts. I look at it this way Scottie off the bench would give us the kind of 6th man that few programs have.
 

Rhoadhoused

Well-Known Member
Apr 27, 2010
11,211
245
63
34
Ames, IA
Allen will start. Fact. Scotty and babb I don't know didn't lutz say that allen was the best guard he had ever coached or something like that?
 

isuno1fan

Well-Known Member
Mar 30, 2006
23,300
4,699
113
Clive, Iowa
Allen shouldn't be in this conversation because 110% he starts.

I happen to think SC starts and if he doesn't I see Ejim filling that spot. I think Babb comes off the bench and so does Booker.

TM
CA
SC/ME
RW
CG

There are probably about 10 different options though.
 

jsb

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 7, 2008
33,329
39,363
113
Allen will start. I would bet that Scotty will start as well. That's nothing against Babb, but Scott has more experience right now. I would suspect that the number of minutes per game will be pretty close between the two of them.
 

gocubs2118

Well-Known Member
Mar 31, 2006
18,599
2,829
113
37
Illinois
Just because Scotty doesn't start doesn't mean he won't play starter minutes. I just happen to think Babb starts because he's a much bigger guard.
 

SCNCY

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 11, 2009
10,689
8,502
113
37
La Fox, IL
If both Scotty and Babb are pretty much equal, give the start to Scotty. Babb has 2-3 years to play at Iowa State, so he will get his chance.
 

bosco

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2008
9,843
7,730
113
Des Moines
Scotty or Ejim or Babb. Don't know who starts but all 3 will play. Its a problem but sounds like a good problem.
 

cy4prez7

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 18, 2010
2,955
365
83
Des Moines
Scott is averaging more points a game but you also need to look at minutes played because Michigan St. and Penn St. both probably had a 8-10 player rotation (although I may be wrong). I would see scott and babb splitting time. We're gonna have a major guard rotation next year. Plus with CG and Royce down low we will get much better looks and I would think many more with some better offensive rebounding.
 

ppclone

Active Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 11, 2006
319
146
43
Scott is averaging more points a game but you also need to look at minutes played because Michigan St. and Penn St. both probably had a 8-10 player rotation (although I may be wrong). I would see scott and babb splitting time. We're gonna have a major guard rotation next year. Plus with CG and Royce down low we will get much better looks and I would think many more with some better offensive rebounding.

Goodness. We'll be 9 deep, legit. Mix and match all you want....but we'll have:
- Frontcourt: Royce, Booker, Edge, Calvin, Railey
- Backcourt: McGee, Scotty, Babb, Allen

Think of the things we'll be able to do next year vs. this year. Press, run, aggressive defense w/o the fear of foul trouble leading to us playing an emergency swimmer-turned-bball walkon having to take the court.

I think it will be less about WHO STARTS and more about how we can spread the minutes around, go all-out, and go with the hot hand(s).

Add to that the culture Freddy's creating....the big and little things....there's no quit in the kids this year despite the situation, discipline even if its your best 2 players being late for a meeting....

Exciting, really.

Wonder if we'll redshirt anyone....McKnight (will he be around?), Bubu? Anyone else?
 

Cydog04

Member
Jan 18, 2011
68
1
8
I still think we play a 3 gaurd lineup next year. Allen will start and I thought SC would be a starter because of his 3 point shooting ability and hes improved as a scorer all around. If he continues to improve then that 3 point shooting would be huge on next years team when theres more options and possibly teams having to double team someone on our team. But I dont know what Babbs is really like or if Ejim could start over him in a bigger lineup next year with a SF. But SC is typically the type of player you want coming off the bench and hitting some 3s to give you some bench productions but hes proven himself as a starter to so I dont know what will happen. Any way you look at it with the tallent on our bench next year we will spread out the minutes way more than this year. I could see bench guys coming in and seeing more minutes than starters depending on whos playing better that game so I dont know that the starting lineup matters.
 

cy4prez7

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 18, 2010
2,955
365
83
Des Moines
I still think we play a 3 gaurd lineup next year. Allen will start and I thought SC would be a starter because of his 3 point shooting ability and hes improved as a scorer all around. If he continues to improve then that 3 point shooting would be huge on next years team when theres more options and possibly teams having to double team someone on our team. But I dont know what Babbs is really like or if Ejim could start over him in a bigger lineup next year with a SF. But SC is typically the type of player you want coming off the bench and hitting some 3s to give you some bench productions but hes proven himself as a starter to so I dont know what will happen. Any way you look at it with the tallent on our bench next year we will spread out the minutes way more than this year. I could see bench guys coming in and seeing more minutes than starters depending on whos playing better that game so I dont know that the starting lineup matters.

Ejim is only one inch taller than Babb. I don't think that'll change the size too much. I do see Ejim playing more of a 3 than a 4 though.
 

SvrWxCy

Well-Known Member
Aug 6, 2010
2,854
102
63
Kansas
www.recruitlists.com
Like a few others have said, I don't think it matters who starts between any number of players. Why? All of them will see significant playing time and will all be important in the team being successful next year. In reality, we could start a dozen different line-ups if we wanted too and that in itself is the concept to be excited about!!
 

snowcraig2.0

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 2, 2007
12,545
10,349
113
47
Cedar Rapids, IA
Like a few others have said, I don't think it matters who starts between any number of players. Why? All of them will see significant playing time and will all be important in the team being successful next year. In reality, we could start a dozen different line-ups if we wanted too and that in itself is the concept to be excited about!!


It does matter who starts. Why do you think teams put their best 5 players on the floor at the start of games?

I get your point, but debating the starting lineup is a worthwhile topic.
 

SvrWxCy

Well-Known Member
Aug 6, 2010
2,854
102
63
Kansas
www.recruitlists.com
It does matter who starts. Why do you think teams put their best 5 players on the floor at the start of games?

I get your point, but debating the starting lineup is a worthwhile topic.

Alright, I will agree that it is A worthwhile topic. Meaning, we only need one topic on starters for next season; rather than multiple topics between different positions, etc...

I guess the bright-side to everything is at least we can have this sort of conversation!! :cool:
 

kingcy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 16, 2006
22,803
3,686
113
Menlo, Iowa
Scott is going to be in the top 5 of 3s made in a season by the time this season is over. He will also be in the top 5 of all time made 3s. Right now he is 70 made 3s out of 2nd place all time. He will also be Sr and the only player on the team to play in every conference arena. Is he a perfect player, no but he does bring more to the table than some give him credit for.
 

Rhoadhoused

Well-Known Member
Apr 27, 2010
11,211
245
63
34
Ames, IA
Scott is going to be in the top 5 of 3s made in a season by the time this season is over. He will also be in the top 5 of all time made 3s. Right now he is 70 made 3s out of 2nd place all time. He will also be Sr and the only player on the team to play in every conference arena. Is he a perfect player, no but he does bring more to the table than some give him credit for.

You realize your statement only gives him credit for 3pt shooting and I guess starting two seasons in a row? How do you factor in the talent on the teams he started for compared to next year's team?
 

cyclonewino

Active Member
Apr 11, 2006
338
137
43
It depends on who shows up at the team meetings :). I think the starting lineup will change from game to game.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron