Good grief...can we just let this thread die already? I mean, the discussion here has circled around on itself so many times it's ridiculous.
There's three feet of floor there. Part of it just has a media table sitting on it... It doesn't say "three unobstructed feet".
Um, no. That is not a violation. If Mason had been in control of the ball prior to going out of bounds then it would be. Otherwise, it is not.
RULE 9
Section 4. Player Out of Bounds
Art. 1. A player who steps out of bounds under his own volition and then becomesthe first player to touch the ball after returning to the playing court has committeda violation.
No one is requiring you to read it.Good grief...can we just let this thread die already? I mean, the discussion here has circled around on itself so many times it's ridiculous.
If they reestablish themselves with two feet inbounds then they can be the first to touch the ball.That was the rule when I was playing. Didn't know if it was changed.
Good grief...can we just let this thread die already? I mean, the discussion here has circled around on itself so many times it's ridiculous.
If they reestablish themselves with two feet inbounds then they can be the first to touch the ball.
Every time Kansas cheats to win I think it can be discussed as long as people want to on here
Good grief...can we just let this thread die already? I mean, the discussion here has circled around on itself so many times it's ridiculous.
There's three feet of floor there. Part of it just has a media table sitting on it... It doesn't say "three unobstructed feet".
Are you ******* kidding me?
True. Ya'll have fun repeating yourselves, ad infinitum!No one is requiring you to read it.
If they reestablish themselves with two feet inbounds then they can be the first to touch the ball.
So this will become the KU season thread similar to the Iowa-Augustana thread.
If they reestablish themselves with two feet inbounds then they can be the first to touch the ball.