You are kidding I hope. Madeline Albright was sorriest excuse we've had for a secretary of state since Alexander Haig. Look at what happened (and did not happen) in the Mideast under her watch. she was under the delusion that we could negotiate with the thug dictators running that part of the world and they took advantage of this whenever they could.
No, I'm not even close to kidding. Those are some thick partisan views clouding your eyes. Back then we actually were operating with some sort of respect abroad, especially in Europe. Those days are long gone, sec. Rice and her don't even belong in the same breath. I do love this quote though:
"Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice argues that the democratic transformation of the Middle East is the only way to guarantee that men do not fly airplanes into buildings. Such rhetoric is overblown. Just because the denial of political freedom is bad, that doesn't mean that the exercise of freedom will always be to our liking. Democracy is a form of government; it is not a ticket to some heavenly kingdom where all evil is vanquished and everyone agrees with us." She goes on to argue for the very same democracy in very reasonable terms.
As you said, "what did or didn't happen in the Mideast".....well, we didn't under Albright's leadership enter a war costing the US alone close to 30,000 troops as of now. We operated and made decisions based on known intelligence rather than "hunches" that Saddam and al-Qaeda had strong ties. Not to mention the WMD's. We concentrated efforts hunting al-Qaeda and were rarely sidetracked. Iran posed less of a nuclear threat because the Iraqi tribes had only trivial reasons to have conflicts, now they've got plenty more targets outside of the middle east. The Israelis and Palestinians were negotiating MORE then than ever before in the thousands of years of conflicts. She stopped the genocide in Kosovo, potentially 2 million saved. By comparison, Bush has yet to make any ground in Darfur and won't be the time he's done, mainly because we've spread ourselves too thin. Oh, and she has never changed her position on Bush's mishaps, opposed the idiotic plans from day 1. We'd be in a hell of a lot better situation now with her vs. Rice.