I feel bad for the mod that has to read all this stuff without the 20 or so page breaks the rest of us get.
Yeah, but they're getting paid in coupons. :twitcy:
Contributing.This thread is epic. It is the only thread that will be judged not by posts, but by number of pages.
I think we need to go for 1000 pages.
I noticed you mentioned jars.This one seemed to fit here.
Murder for a jar of red rum
t was Osborne who was the lone public voice of displeasure back in the 1990s, when the Big Eight absorbed teams from the troubled Southwest Conference during the evolution of the Big 12
Read more: Texas drove everyone away, now begging for ACC acceptance - NCAA Football - Sporting News
Yet he agreed to the model of revenue sharing that ultimately brought us to this situation. NE, OU, UT, and A&M were all laughing like mad men drilling holes into the sinkin ship as they sit on their piles of money. When NE's pile of money didn't stack up to the other's they got ****** and got a life raft to the B10.
Sick and tired of hearing how NE was this lone voice of reason. When they had a hand in building this house of cards.
And Texas wasn't even one of the programs who came up with unequal revenue sharing. Care to take a guess who those three were? NU, CU, and aTm. Texas simply did what they could with what others helped decide. You can bang on Texas all you guys want, but they did nothing outside of the rules other teams allowed them to create. When no one else could pull that off, they cried and left. I think there was a little more to it for NU, however, that little more still came down to the fact that their **** wasn't as big. Hell, OU had the infrastructure for a network of their own but they couldn't even get it. aTm was invited to a partnership with UT on their network as well. It also seems to me like Texas is working pretty ******* hard to save this thing.
UT is not without sin in this either. Their "screw you all we're awesome" attitude perpetuated a bigger divide as well.