So can someone tell me if we are completely out of the woods yet? Are there any scenarios left out there that leave us out of an AQ conference?
if OU/UT cant work **** out but i dont see that being a problem
So can someone tell me if we are completely out of the woods yet? Are there any scenarios left out there that leave us out of an AQ conference?
Do you truly believe the Big 12 will ever be truly stabilized?
I heard a lot of the same last summer after the new TV deal, then look what happened a year later. Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice....
I have to believe the TAMU administration learned their lesson. They clearly stated yesterday that they have no intentions of being in the Big 12 next season and I clearly believe they'll be SEC bound in 2012.
Quite clearly, this conference is NOT viable in the long term. Hell, Oklahoma is talking about getting a deal done that will stabilize the conference for FIVE years. Five. That's their major aspirations for the conference - stabilize it for five years. Not 20, not 30, FIVE.
As long as UT is in this conference, there won't be any stabilizing. OU wants to stabilize the conference, but the problem is, they've now lost all of their leverage to do that. They can't play the "We're going to the PAC" card anymore. In other words, I don't see UT making ANY concessions because they no longer have to - UT can dictate terms as long as OU can't threaten to leave.
if OU/UT cant work **** out but i dont see that being a problem
Take it elsewhere squateye. A year ago you were throwing out all these scenarios where it was inevitable ISU would end up MWC or MAC.Do you truly believe the Big 12 will ever be truly stabilized?
I heard a lot of the same last summer after the new TV deal, then look what happened a year later. Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice....
I have to believe the TAMU administration learned their lesson. They clearly stated yesterday that they have no intentions of being in the Big 12 next season and I clearly believe they'll be SEC bound in 2012.
Quite clearly, this conference is NOT viable in the long term. Hell, Oklahoma is talking about getting a deal done that will stabilize the conference for FIVE years. Five. That's their major aspirations for the conference - stabilize it for five years. Not 20, not 30, FIVE.
As long as UT is in this conference, there won't be any stabilizing. OU wants to stabilize the conference, but the problem is, they've now lost all of their leverage to do that. They can't play the "We're going to the PAC" card anymore. In other words, I don't see UT making ANY concessions because they no longer have to - UT can dictate terms as long as OU can't threaten to leave.
They're gone.
Some day, when this is all said and done we need to give this thread a proper send-off. A funeral of sorts before it falls off the front page. Chris Williams would give a moving eulogy, I'm sure.
Do you truly believe the Big 12 will ever be truly stabilized?
I heard a lot of the same last summer after the new TV deal, then look what happened a year later. Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice....
I have to believe the TAMU administration learned their lesson. They clearly stated yesterday that they have no intentions of being in the Big 12 next season and I clearly believe they'll be SEC bound in 2012.
Quite clearly, this conference is NOT viable in the long term. Hell, Oklahoma is talking about getting a deal done that will stabilize the conference for FIVE years. Five. That's their major aspirations for the conference - stabilize it for five years. Not 20, not 30, FIVE.
As long as UT is in this conference, there won't be any stabilizing. OU wants to stabilize the conference, but the problem is, they've now lost all of their leverage to do that. They can't play the "We're going to the PAC" card anymore. In other words, I don't see UT making ANY concessions because they no longer have to - UT can dictate terms as long as OU can't threaten to leave.
Scoreboard.
Even if they can't, ISU will still be in an AQ league.
I may be in the minority but after going through this last few weeks, I really don't want the Big 12 to take 3 Big East teams and kill it off. I know we need to look out for ourselves but there were some doomsday scenarios for ISU if the Big 12 fell apart...I wouldn't want to cause that for some of the Big East schools.
Definition of RELEVANCE
a : relation to the matter at hand
b : practical and especially social applicability
Also, I forgot to mention. The other thing that really hurts the Big 12 is the fact that the ACC & (presumably) SEC are going to be 14 school leagues. It may not be tomorrow, it may not be five years from now, but eventually the Big Ten & PAC will follow suit and it will likely be at the expense of either the Big East or the Big 12.....leading to further instability.
No Big 12 conference member will be able to sleep well at night or trust the other members after the last two years. That is a big deal that is often overlooked.
Take it elsewhere squateye. A year ago you were throwing out all these scenarios where it was inevitable ISU would end up MWC or MAC.
The biggest thing I take from this whole thing is that Chip Brown is full of ****.
Definition of RELEVANCE
a : relation to the matter at hand
b : practical and especially social applicability
Also, I forgot to mention. The other thing that really hurts the Big 12 is the fact that the ACC & (presumably) SEC are going to be 14 school leagues. It may not be tomorrow, it may not be five years from now, but eventually the Big Ten & PAC will follow suit and it will likely be at the expense of either the Big East or the Big 12.....leading to further instability.
No Big 12 conference member will be able to sleep well at night or trust the other members after the last two years. That is a big deal that is often overlooked.
BS.LOL. I've been very consistent in saying that I think ISU will end up in an AQ league.
I've never once stated that ISU would end up in the MAC. I have most consistently said that ISU would end up in a BCS "leftovers" league - a combination of the Big 12, Big East, and the best of the rest non AQs.
LOL. I've been very consistent in saying that I think ISU will end up in an AQ league.
I've never once stated that ISU would end up in the MAC. I have most consistently said that ISU would end up in a BCS "leftovers" league - a combination of the Big 12, Big East, and the best of the rest non AQs.