*****The Super, Mega, Huge Big 12 Expansion Thread*****

Status
Not open for further replies.

Incyte

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2007
4,956
931
83
Do you truly believe the Big 12 will ever be truly stabilized?

I heard a lot of the same last summer after the new TV deal, then look what happened a year later. Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice....

I have to believe the TAMU administration learned their lesson. They clearly stated yesterday that they have no intentions of being in the Big 12 next season and I clearly believe they'll be SEC bound in 2012.

Quite clearly, this conference is NOT viable in the long term. Hell, Oklahoma is talking about getting a deal done that will stabilize the conference for FIVE years. Five. That's their major aspirations for the conference - stabilize it for five years. Not 20, not 30, FIVE.

As long as UT is in this conference, there won't be any stabilizing. OU wants to stabilize the conference, but the problem is, they've now lost all of their leverage to do that. They can't play the "We're going to the PAC" card anymore. In other words, I don't see UT making ANY concessions because they no longer have to - UT can dictate terms as long as OU can't threaten to leave.

Get lost hawk. Scoreboard.
 

cycloneworld

Facebook Knows All
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 20, 2006
30,159
22,489
113
Urbandale, IA
I may be in the minority but after going through this last few weeks, I really don't want the Big 12 to take 3 Big East teams and kill it off. I know we need to look out for ourselves but there were some doomsday scenarios for ISU if the Big 12 fell apart...I wouldn't want to cause that for some of the Big East schools.
 

Clonefan32

Well-Known Member
Nov 19, 2008
23,515
25,976
113
Some day, when this is all said and done we need to give this thread a proper send-off. A funeral of sorts before it falls off the front page. Chris Williams would give a moving eulogy, I'm sure.
 

Clone83

Well-Known Member
Mar 25, 2006
5,074
1,075
113
Do you truly believe the Big 12 will ever be truly stabilized?

I heard a lot of the same last summer after the new TV deal, then look what happened a year later. Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice....

I have to believe the TAMU administration learned their lesson. They clearly stated yesterday that they have no intentions of being in the Big 12 next season and I clearly believe they'll be SEC bound in 2012.

Quite clearly, this conference is NOT viable in the long term. Hell, Oklahoma is talking about getting a deal done that will stabilize the conference for FIVE years. Five. That's their major aspirations for the conference - stabilize it for five years. Not 20, not 30, FIVE.

As long as UT is in this conference, there won't be any stabilizing. OU wants to stabilize the conference, but the problem is, they've now lost all of their leverage to do that. They can't play the "We're going to the PAC" card anymore. In other words, I don't see UT making ANY concessions because they no longer have to - UT can dictate terms as long as OU can't threaten to leave.
Take it elsewhere squateye. A year ago you were throwing out all these scenarios where it was inevitable ISU would end up MWC or MAC.
 

Clonefan32

Well-Known Member
Nov 19, 2008
23,515
25,976
113
Do you truly believe the Big 12 will ever be truly stabilized?

I heard a lot of the same last summer after the new TV deal, then look what happened a year later. Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice....

I have to believe the TAMU administration learned their lesson. They clearly stated yesterday that they have no intentions of being in the Big 12 next season and I clearly believe they'll be SEC bound in 2012.

Quite clearly, this conference is NOT viable in the long term. Hell, Oklahoma is talking about getting a deal done that will stabilize the conference for FIVE years. Five. That's their major aspirations for the conference - stabilize it for five years. Not 20, not 30, FIVE.

As long as UT is in this conference, there won't be any stabilizing. OU wants to stabilize the conference, but the problem is, they've now lost all of their leverage to do that. They can't play the "We're going to the PAC" card anymore. In other words, I don't see UT making ANY concessions because they no longer have to - UT can dictate terms as long as OU can't threaten to leave.

So OSU and TT played all their cards to the Pac and they got denied. OU will apparently have troubles moving without OSU. So all we stand to lose is Texas moving somewhere (somewhere they will lose significant amounts of money). I think we remain stable at this point, especially if we add a few more schools.
 

hawkfan

Well-Known Member
Feb 18, 2009
1,509
40
48
Scoreboard.

Definition of RELEVANCE

a : relation to the matter at hand
b : practical and especially social applicability

Also, I forgot to mention. The other thing that really hurts the Big 12 is the fact that the ACC & (presumably) SEC are going to be 14 school leagues. It may not be tomorrow, it may not be five years from now, but eventually the Big Ten & PAC will follow suit and it will likely be at the expense of either the Big East or the Big 12.....leading to further instability.

No Big 12 conference member will be able to sleep well at night or trust the other members after the last two years. That is a big deal that is often overlooked.
 

MNCyGuy

Well-Known Member
Jan 14, 2009
11,644
551
83
Des Moines
I may be in the minority but after going through this last few weeks, I really don't want the Big 12 to take 3 Big East teams and kill it off. I know we need to look out for ourselves but there were some doomsday scenarios for ISU if the Big 12 fell apart...I wouldn't want to cause that for some of the Big East schools.

I get the sentiment, but that league is the walking dead right now anyway. I find it hard to believe that the SEC won't change their mind and come calling for WVU now. That leaves UConn, Rutgers, South Florida, Cincinnatti, Louisville, and TCU (So all of ONE original football member). Who do they add? Temple? ECU? UCF? How comfortable are you in that league? I almost think we'd be doing them a favor to take three and put that league out of it's misery.
 

Clonefan32

Well-Known Member
Nov 19, 2008
23,515
25,976
113
Definition of RELEVANCE

a : relation to the matter at hand
b : practical and especially social applicability

Also, I forgot to mention. The other thing that really hurts the Big 12 is the fact that the ACC & (presumably) SEC are going to be 14 school leagues. It may not be tomorrow, it may not be five years from now, but eventually the Big Ten & PAC will follow suit and it will likely be at the expense of either the Big East or the Big 12.....leading to further instability.

No Big 12 conference member will be able to sleep well at night or trust the other members after the last two years. That is a big deal that is often overlooked.

Again, where is anyone going to go?
 

hawkfan

Well-Known Member
Feb 18, 2009
1,509
40
48
Take it elsewhere squateye. A year ago you were throwing out all these scenarios where it was inevitable ISU would end up MWC or MAC.

LOL. I've been very consistent in saying that I think ISU will end up in an AQ league.

I've never once stated that ISU would end up in the MAC. I have most consistently said that ISU would end up in a BCS "leftovers" league - a combination of the Big 12, Big East, and the best of the rest non AQs.
 

Incyte

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2007
4,956
931
83
Definition of RELEVANCE

a : relation to the matter at hand
b : practical and especially social applicability

Also, I forgot to mention. The other thing that really hurts the Big 12 is the fact that the ACC & (presumably) SEC are going to be 14 school leagues. It may not be tomorrow, it may not be five years from now, but eventually the Big Ten & PAC will follow suit and it will likely be at the expense of either the Big East or the Big 12.....leading to further instability.

No Big 12 conference member will be able to sleep well at night or trust the other members after the last two years. That is a big deal that is often overlooked.

Scoreboard. We kicked your ***. That is all.
 

Clone83

Well-Known Member
Mar 25, 2006
5,074
1,075
113
LOL. I've been very consistent in saying that I think ISU will end up in an AQ league.

I've never once stated that ISU would end up in the MAC. I have most consistently said that ISU would end up in a BCS "leftovers" league - a combination of the Big 12, Big East, and the best of the rest non AQs.
BS.
 

Clonefan32

Well-Known Member
Nov 19, 2008
23,515
25,976
113
LOL. I've been very consistent in saying that I think ISU will end up in an AQ league.

I've never once stated that ISU would end up in the MAC. I have most consistently said that ISU would end up in a BCS "leftovers" league - a combination of the Big 12, Big East, and the best of the rest non AQs.

And how is that prediction looking now?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.