*****The Super, Mega, Huge Big 12 Expansion Thread*****

Status
Not open for further replies.
C

CyBer

Guest
I don't understand the obsession with BYU and I don't agree that they are the biggest financial get out there. Not at all. Unless you are Mormon or stuck in Utah, or both, then BYU is not all that great IMO. And the baggage they bring in by insisting that there be NO Sunday games is very troubling for Basketball. I say NO to BYU.
No games on sundays for them, so what? That's not all that difficult to schedule around.
 

cyman05

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 7, 2010
2,138
328
83
I don't understand the obsession with BYU and I don't agree that they are the biggest financial get out there. Not at all. Unless you are Mormon or stuck in Utah, or both, then BYU is not all that great IMO. And the baggage they bring in by insisting that there be NO Sunday games is very troubling for Basketball. I say NO to BYU.

Financially, there is not a bigger school that is potentially available than BYU. They have the most eyeballs and they have the biggest national draw of any non-Big10/PAC/SEC/ACC school (other than ND).
 

KneeGusto

Well-Known Member
May 13, 2006
964
385
63
S̶q̶u̶a̶w̶ Ioway Creek
An article with a bunch more BYU-Big12 details of their limited discussions. I apologize if this has already been posted.

ksl.com - Cougar Tracks: BYU AD Holmoe on Big East: "There were some uncertainties"


Thank you for the link. You can read exactly what they say and determine the underlying "what they mean."

AD Tom Holmoe sounds like BYU isn't a lock to do anything and their options are more wide open than previously thought. The writer of the article didn't slant it so it will probably bring more speculation of what BYU will do.
 

simply1

Rec Center HOF
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jun 10, 2009
45,975
34,703
113
Pdx
The feeling I get here is that everyone wants BYU in the Big XII, with a tough read on the AD. They like the national exposure on ESPN that their deal brings for mormons outside of the state, however they really may have a problem going forward scheduling meaningful games after October. The Utah game was moved up, and they are pretty much irrelevant right now in the chumps they're playing.
 

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,988
66,497
113
LA LA Land
BYU is never happening. Its not byu balking at the big east, its the big east balking at the conditions BYU is trying to put on any conference it joins, the same conditions that caused discussions with the big 12 not to go very far.

If BYU wants to come in with no conditions and be an equal member, sure, bring them in. Otherwise they can gtfo.

Why on Earth would BYU act the same toward the Big 12 as the revamped Big East including East Carolina and Navy? There's 5-10x the money to be had as a Big 12 member.

Applying BYU's balking at the radically revamped Big East to what they'd agree upon in the Big 12 makes no sense at all. The Big 12 was already more lucrative than the old 8 team Big East and it's going to be light years more lucrative than the new watered down version going forward (if that conference even exists).

It's all about what's important. If TV deals and overall revenue are important, BYU is target #1 by far (unless Notre Dame is interested). If geographic fit and logistics for the student athlete are more important they probably aren't, although it's not like there are a ton of great fit options outside of Louisville.
 

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
59,627
74,500
113
Ankeny
Why on Earth would BYU act the same toward the Big 12 as the revamped Big East including East Carolina and Navy? There's 5-10x the money to be had as a Big 12 member.

Applying BYU's balking at the radically revamped Big East to what they'd agree upon in the Big 12 makes no sense at all. The Big 12 was already more lucrative than the old 8 team Big East and it's going to be light years more lucrative than the new watered down version going forward (if that conference even exists).

It's all about what's important. If TV deals and overall revenue are important, BYU is target #1 by far (unless Notre Dame is interested). If geographic fit and logistics for the student athlete are more important they probably aren't, although it's not like there are a ton of great fit options outside of Louisville.

It may not make sense, but that's what's been reported over the past 2 months. It sounds like theyve got the arrogance of Notre Dame\Texas without the pedigree to go with it. If something was going to happen with BYU and the Big 12 it wouldve happened a long time ago, as they were one of the initial targets for expansion.
 

Stormin

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
45,510
14,388
113
Financially, there is not a bigger school that is potentially available than BYU. They have the most eyeballs and they have the biggest national draw of any non-Big10/PAC/SEC/ACC school (other than ND).

I would disagree. Big 12 does not need BYU. BYU is becoming largely irrelevant as they struggle with their mediocre schedule. WHO wants to watch the BYU network? Really. IMO, it would be stupid to cave in to the demands of BYU. WHY should the Big 12 have to concede anything to BYU? We do not need them. They couldn't elevate the status of the conferences they were playing in to AQ status. BYU is overrated.
 

cyman05

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 7, 2010
2,138
328
83
I would disagree. Big 12 does not need BYU. BYU is becoming largely irrelevant as they struggle with their mediocre schedule. WHO wants to watch the BYU network? Really. IMO, it would be stupid to cave in to the demands of BYU. WHY should the Big 12 have to concede anything to BYU? We do not need them. They couldn't elevate the status of the conferences they were playing in to AQ status. BYU is overrated.


I never said the B12 needed BYU or that they could elevate the status of the B12. They don't need to concede anything at all to them. I just said they're the biggest get available right now from a financial standpoint.

And I think we've learned with Notre Dame that tradition and national following is far more important than current mediocre success with a mediocre schedule.
 

Wesley

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
70,923
546
113
Omaha
I still am not sure what the sticking points on BYU negotiations are. Is it they need more content for BYU network than the BIG 12 can accommodate. I mean, they can have most of it from what i can tell. We do not want to play on Sunday anyway. Just what concessions are needed?
 
Last edited:

Stormin

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
45,510
14,388
113
I still am not sure what the sticking points on BYU negotiations are. Is it they need more content for BYU network than the BIG 12 can accommodate. I mean, they can have most of it from what i can tell. We do not want to play on Sunday anyway. Just what concessions are needed?

For the Conference Basketball Tournament we definitely want to play on Sunday. NO concessions. And NO partial conference members. We are the Big 12. They are just BYU. BYU was a member of a non-AQ conference and could not even come close to elevating that conference to be considered for AQ status. The clout of BYU is greatly over rated. They have a cult following from a religious sect. That is it. NO to BYU.
 

Die4Cy

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2010
14,972
15,857
113
I'm going to jump out there and be the very first person to suggest to the Big East that a football conference including San Diego State and Boise might be a little unsustainable.

At what point does the Big East step back and take a look at what they are doing and say, "You know, we probably CAN go that route, but it really makes no sense just to keep this flagging league limping along."
 

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
59,627
74,500
113
Ankeny
They just might want to look at changing their conference name. Just maybe.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.